Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Landing in Narita >

Landing in Narita

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Landing in Narita

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2010, 12:06 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,096
Default

Originally Posted by Runner View Post
First of all, please don't misconstrue this post as a criticism or commentary of any type on FDX 80.

I do feel like this video of a KAL 777 fighting strong winds / windshear might help one (that may or may not have flown into Narita before) more clearly understand what one is up against when landing at this airport with these extreme conditions.

YouTube - Boeing777 Good Landing?
If you didn't want someone to misconstrue, then why did you post a video of a passenger jet in the Cargo Forum? As other's have said, there was little to no wind during this landing (watch the windsock). Additionally, the smoke off the tires doesn't blow away ... it lingers. I wouldn't exactly call this extreme conditions. More so, this is Pilot Induced Oscillations (PIO).
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 06-02-2010, 01:07 PM
  #22  
pants on the ground
 
mmaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: back seat
Posts: 1,358
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy View Post
If you didn't want someone to misconstrue, then why did you post a video of a passenger jet in the Cargo Forum? As other's have said, there was little to no wind during this landing (watch the windsock). Additionally, the smoke off the tires doesn't blow away ... it lingers. I wouldn't exactly call this extreme conditions. More so, this is Pilot Induced Oscillations (PIO).

What KC10 said. If I have to change my pants just watching this, wonder how those pilots are doing?
mmaviator is offline  
Old 06-02-2010, 04:55 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Good thing that wasn't built in Long Beach. Gear would've collapsed and a wing would've broken off.
Busboy is offline  
Old 06-02-2010, 05:20 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Polarfr8dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 335
Default

Hmm . . . what landed before that one? Light quartering tailwind keeps the vortex on the runway the previous bird? Bueller? Bueller?
Polarfr8dog is offline  
Old 06-03-2010, 07:28 AM
  #25  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 6
Default

I was looking and trying to figure exactly how far down the runway the actual touchdown was, at least at the end of the touchdown zone. However, from the response of the aircraft, a sinking/rolling motion, I agree that it was probably a case of wake turbulence that caused this touchdown.
md11av8or is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FLowpayFO
Regional
26
05-26-2010 08:11 PM
jsjohnson2
Major
369
10-22-2009 02:57 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
2
06-17-2009 06:51 AM
MX727
Cargo
16
02-24-2009 09:30 PM
robbreid
Corporate
18
01-17-2009 02:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices