Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

CZAR 52 Accident

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2010, 08:46 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,192
Default

Originally Posted by Whistlin' Dan View Post
Why it happened cannot be determined ....
Because he was a hot dogging cowboy asshat that thought he was flying a fighter. The revolt of any crew to fly with him should have been a huge eye opener. Personally if he'd called me a ***** after protesting about clearing a ridgeline at 3' I'd probably beat him senseless and let the chips fall from there.
Grumble is offline  
Old 10-08-2010, 02:20 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 276
Default

"Why it happened cannot be determined..."

Originally Posted by Grumble View Post
Because he was a hot dogging cowboy asshat...
Agreed. But he was also in charge of the Wing's Standardization and Evaluation branch, which means that somebody up the chain-of-command was favorably impressed with his flying, and had charged him with impressing upon those in his organization his distorted sense of values and standards. That opens up a whole new chain of responsibility for the accident.

I think the OP was asking about the "why" from an aerodynamic perspective. How much altitude does it take to recover a B-52 from a 90 degree bank at minimum airspeed? How much from a stall in that condition? I doubt many B-52 pilots know, but I would guess at least 10,000' would be as good a place as any to start.
Whistlin' Dan is offline  
Old 10-08-2010, 03:04 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Default

Big airplanes are not fighters. Sometimes its better just to park them on the ramp and let the airplane speak for itself.
Fishfreighter is offline  
Old 10-09-2010, 05:21 AM
  #14  
Super Moderator
 
crewdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,549
Default

Originally Posted by Whistlin' Dan View Post
"Why it happened cannot be determined..."

Agreed. But he was also in charge of the Wing's Standardization and Evaluation branch, which means that somebody up the chain-of-command was favorably impressed with his flying, and had charged him with impressing upon those in his organization his distorted sense of values and standards. That opens up a whole new chain of responsibility for the accident.
Nepotism...

He should have lost his wings after almost hit a ridge line, trying to show off for the camera!

Last edited by crewdawg; 10-09-2010 at 05:31 AM.
crewdawg is offline  
Old 10-10-2010, 10:11 AM
  #15  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,253
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg View Post
Nepotism...

He should have lost his wings after almost hit a ridge line, trying to show off for the camera!
Nepotism? Was he related to a someone up the chain?
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Whacker77
Aviation Law
1
12-19-2008 11:15 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
stinsonjr
Hangar Talk
8
12-09-2007 02:29 PM
cl65
Major
0
03-02-2006 08:31 PM
AlohaFlyer
Hiring News
7
09-02-2005 06:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices