Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

CZAR 52 Accident

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2010 | 08:46 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 109
Default

Originally Posted by Whistlin' Dan
Why it happened cannot be determined ....
Because he was a hot dogging cowboy asshat that thought he was flying a fighter. The revolt of any crew to fly with him should have been a huge eye opener. Personally if he'd called me a ***** after protesting about clearing a ridgeline at 3' I'd probably beat him senseless and let the chips fall from there.
Reply
Old 10-08-2010 | 02:20 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Default

"Why it happened cannot be determined..."

Originally Posted by Grumble
Because he was a hot dogging cowboy asshat...
Agreed. But he was also in charge of the Wing's Standardization and Evaluation branch, which means that somebody up the chain-of-command was favorably impressed with his flying, and had charged him with impressing upon those in his organization his distorted sense of values and standards. That opens up a whole new chain of responsibility for the accident.

I think the OP was asking about the "why" from an aerodynamic perspective. How much altitude does it take to recover a B-52 from a 90 degree bank at minimum airspeed? How much from a stall in that condition? I doubt many B-52 pilots know, but I would guess at least 10,000' would be as good a place as any to start.
Reply
Old 10-08-2010 | 03:04 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
Default

Big airplanes are not fighters. Sometimes its better just to park them on the ramp and let the airplane speak for itself.
Reply
Old 10-09-2010 | 05:21 AM
  #14  
crewdawg's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,431
Likes: 434
Default

Originally Posted by Whistlin' Dan
"Why it happened cannot be determined..."

Agreed. But he was also in charge of the Wing's Standardization and Evaluation branch, which means that somebody up the chain-of-command was favorably impressed with his flying, and had charged him with impressing upon those in his organization his distorted sense of values and standards. That opens up a whole new chain of responsibility for the accident.
Nepotism...

He should have lost his wings after almost hit a ridge line, trying to show off for the camera!

Last edited by crewdawg; 10-09-2010 at 05:31 AM.
Reply
Old 10-10-2010 | 10:11 AM
  #15  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,895
Likes: 690
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg
Nepotism...

He should have lost his wings after almost hit a ridge line, trying to show off for the camera!
Nepotism? Was he related to a someone up the chain?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Whacker77
Aviation Law
1
12-19-2008 11:15 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
stinsonjr
Hangar Talk
8
12-09-2007 02:29 PM
cl65
Major
0
03-02-2006 08:31 PM
AlohaFlyer
Hiring News
7
09-02-2005 06:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices