Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Need your support: Oppose NPRM cargo cutout >

Need your support: Oppose NPRM cargo cutout

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Need your support: Oppose NPRM cargo cutout

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-21-2011, 11:43 AM
  #51  
Line Holder
 
TpaPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: B747-4, G200, BE400A, IA-JET
Posts: 42
Default

Originally Posted by 7four7 View Post
I'm just here trying to get a recommendation for UPS or FEDEX job...not here to make any friends.
I bet they're just pouring in now.


Now back to your previously scheduled thread.

Last edited by TpaPilot; 12-21-2011 at 12:13 PM.
TpaPilot is offline  
Old 12-22-2011, 07:20 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
742drvr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 744 Captain
Posts: 167
Default

I think an immediate discriminating lawsuit is in order!!!!!!
742drvr is offline  
Old 12-22-2011, 07:44 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: airplane
Posts: 115
Default

Originally Posted by 742drvr View Post
I think an immediate discriminating lawsuit is in order!!!!!!
surely a lawsuit is in order.... I would like to think the various unions can come together and get this litigated up to the supreme court if they have to.

It's utterly ridiculous that they can make two totally different regs and claim cost... especially when UPS/FEDEX make more money than the entire passenger sector combined!
FailOperational is offline  
Old 12-22-2011, 07:55 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 160
Default

Originally Posted by FailOperational View Post
LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT..

Congress passed this rule with the cargo and supplemental ops intact..
Actually, it was the FAA, not Congress. That said, it might be possible to get Congress to pass a bill that forces the FAA to remove the cargo cutout. That's likely the next push.
Baja is offline  
Old 12-22-2011, 08:49 AM
  #55  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: On Food Stamps
Posts: 937
Default

The unions are all worthless and until we ban together and say we have had enough, nothing will change.
Shaggy1970 is offline  
Old 12-23-2011, 03:28 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WingOffLight's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: 1st class
Posts: 250
Default

Originally Posted by PilotFrog View Post
I think if this was in the hey day of big unions you would strike immediately against the two levels of safety.
Actually, a stand down for safety is "not" considered a job action. An industry wide stand down, albeit da*n near impossible, would be 100% legal. The term "stand down" is widely misused today for a day of training etc. However, it originally referred to an act of standing down from a labor activity in hazardous situations.

The next question would be "Well, why haven’t you ever done it in the past". The answer is simple. In the past we have never had a comprehensive study dealing with fatigue. Now we do and they are industry specific. Furthermore, for reasons which are purely financial, our safety is and well-being is being put in jeopardy over those in similar practiced trade.

Take the above statement to any Lawyer.. Even one for the Ol’mighty ALPA and have them try to argue against it. Actually just take the above statement and go to a case law database. Also, dont get over involved with the United States being the named Defendant. Its done all the time over BS laws and practices.........
WingOffLight is offline  
Old 12-23-2011, 05:55 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: airplane
Posts: 115
Default

Originally Posted by Shaggy1970 View Post
The unions are all worthless and until we ban together and say we have had enough, nothing will change.
I fully agree... they need to get of their butts and put some of those dues to work doing something seriously productive..

There should be a national campaign and work action/slow down or what ever you want to call it. ALL pilots who feel remotely tired due to long days, odd hours or haphazard schedules should immediately call in fatigued.

I mean of all the operations that NEEDED this rule, international cargo ops was by far the most critical.. multiple time zones, 16+ hour days extendable to 20+ .. and they think we don't need it? seriously?
FailOperational is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Freighter Captain
Major
24
02-03-2008 08:59 PM
daytonaflyer
Cargo
1
06-09-2006 11:32 AM
Freight Dog
Cargo
1
05-21-2006 09:27 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
09-14-2005 10:35 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-09-2005 09:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices