Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Please sign the petition to keep TOWERS >

Please sign the petition to keep TOWERS

Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Please sign the petition to keep TOWERS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2013 | 03:04 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: In the TRACON
Default

Originally Posted by FlyJSH
The solution to waiting for the other guy to cancel is to politely remind him after he reports clearing the runway.... at least that always worked for me.
In a lot of cases that isn't possible because the pilot is on the CTAF frequency, not the approach frequency. I routinely make calls to FBOs looking for aircraft that never canceled as it is. Some of these guys have been flying into these airports for years and have never had to worry about cancelling, and someone will forget.
Reply
Old 03-24-2013 | 05:41 PM
  #22  
FlyJSH's Avatar
Day puke
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 0
From: Out.
Default

Originally Posted by jmcmanna
In a lot of cases that isn't possible because the pilot is on the CTAF frequency, not the approach frequency. I routinely make calls to FBOs looking for aircraft that never canceled as it is. Some of these guys have been flying into these airports for years and have never had to worry about cancelling, and someone will forget.
Two radios: one on ATC and the other on CTAF.
Reply
Old 03-24-2013 | 11:07 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Beaver Hunter
Nope from me. Tax payer rip off. Most of these towers handle few moments at night. We have to stop the flow of my tax money at some point.
I am tired of the kingdom getting larger each day. No more tax takers.

You are way out of reality brother, if you really believe in what you said......

You don't cut the essential services to save money......
What do you suggest to cut next.... The Border patrol, the police, Fire dept, Ambulance, the US Army, Air defence.......

To save what, just $50 mil, won't even make a dent in the FAA's budget, leave alone the national revenue or debt.

If those places had a tower, there was a reason for it. If some of the places don't need a tower, then FAA needs to re-evaluate, not cut them blindly just because of lack of funds.....

The world will laugh indeed...... That AMERICA can't afford to keep it's towers running & shut 173 towers just to save $50 million a year........

If one GA accident happens, that blood will be whose hands ????

Why...... just so someone making over 250K per year doesn't have to pay what he used to pay in taxes........

Think again.....
Reply
Old 03-25-2013 | 06:44 AM
  #24  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Press Release – FAA Makes Tower Closing Decision

Looks like they reconsidered 24 of the towers.
Check the links at the bottom of the article for the newest lists - to include the cost-sharing towers.
Reply
Old 03-25-2013 | 08:05 AM
  #25  
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,196
Likes: 51
From: Legacy FO
Default Please sign the petition to keep TOWERS

Nope. Not gonna do it. Our government needs some trimming and my FOM has procedures for flying into uncontrolled fields. I think I'll be just fine.
Reply
Old 03-25-2013 | 08:24 AM
  #26  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,882
Likes: 680
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Hopefully the ones reconsidered all have 121 service.
Reply
Old 03-25-2013 | 08:27 AM
  #27  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,882
Likes: 680
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by bcpilot
You are way out of reality brother, if you really believe in what you said......

You don't cut the essential services to save money......
What do you suggest to cut next.... The Border patrol, the police, Fire dept, Ambulance, the US Army, Air defence.......

To save what, just $50 mil, won't even make a dent in the FAA's budget, leave alone the national revenue or debt.

If those places had a tower, there was a reason for it. If some of the places don't need a tower, then FAA needs to re-evaluate, not cut them blindly just because of lack of funds.....

The world will laugh indeed...... That AMERICA can't afford to keep it's towers running & shut 173 towers just to save $50 million a year........

If one GA accident happens, that blood will be whose hands ????

Why...... just so someone making over 250K per year doesn't have to pay what he used to pay in taxes........

Think again.....
This is a publicity stunt...if they really wanted to they could have absorbed the cuts elsewhere.

Most notable...these contract towers are not staffed by GS employees. So no government union members are impacted.
Reply
Old 03-25-2013 | 11:04 AM
  #28  
hypoxia's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Default

My town has a "contract tower" for the past couple years that's on the chopping block. They have done more damage to general aviation by treating every aviator like a child, I say good riddance!
Reply
Old 03-26-2013 | 03:44 PM
  #29  
cardiomd's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
From: Seat: Vegan friendly faux leather
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Hopefully the ones reconsidered all have 121 service.
Alas, there are quite a few that are still slated to close that do have 121, with LCC (e.g. Spirit Airlines, Frontier IIRC), which pledge to continue service. I think budget could have been pulled from elsewhere.

I hope it doesn't occur, but can you imagine the headlines if there is a midair shortly after one of the closures? Our government at work.
Reply
Old 03-27-2013 | 05:44 AM
  #30  
UnderOveur's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: Holding over Macho Grande
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
This is a publicity stunt...if they really wanted to they could have absorbed the cuts elsewhere.

Most notable...these contract towers are not staffed by GS employees. So no government union members are impacted.

Yep.

Did you know...??

All of the specified towers were operational in 2009, when the FAA received less funding than it will under sequestration. Since 2000, the FAA’s operations budget has increased more than 50 percent, while domestic air traffic has declined 27 percent during the same period. Under sequestration, the FAA is required to cut $637 million, or roughly just 5 percent, from its $12.5 billion budget.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlyAstarJets
Major
24
01-12-2012 06:01 AM
jedinein
Cargo
26
01-11-2012 07:17 PM
Freight Dog
Cargo
28
03-23-2008 09:00 PM
hyperone
Cargo
14
10-27-2007 05:28 AM
RedBaron007
Hangar Talk
1
03-14-2007 06:30 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices