Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Asiana 777 Crash at SFO >

Asiana 777 Crash at SFO

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Asiana 777 Crash at SFO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2014, 12:35 PM
  #941  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
"Bus" usually means 320-series, including 18/19/21.
And in this case, my post pertains to all airbuses except the 300 and 310.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 06-26-2014, 12:41 PM
  #942  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by cencal83406 View Post
Sounds very subjective, as in technique. Do autothrottles really cause this much consternation automation-wise? We fly a forced "mixed mode" in the CRJ-200... No A/T whatsoever.
That is a different case with A/T not installed. You lose the protections that come from having A/T, but you also aren't tempted in using it as a crutch as well.

One of the highest threats you can have is hand flying with the A/T on in an approach... you have to make sure you're in the desired mode and understand the implications.

Asiana was a text book example of using it as a crutch and thinking it will always be there to help.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 06-26-2014, 01:39 PM
  #943  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Default

IMHO, automation has saved more lives in the vast scheme of aviation and we should be careful trying to solve a perceived problem by degrading the aircraft automation. Ultimately the issue falls back on the pilots, but the manufactures and training is where it starts.
iceman49 is offline  
Old 06-26-2014, 02:00 PM
  #944  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49 View Post
IMHO, automation has saved more lives in the vast scheme of aviation and we should be careful trying to solve a perceived problem by degrading the aircraft automation. Ultimately the issue falls back on the pilots, but the manufactures and training is where it starts.
Very good points.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 06-26-2014, 02:29 PM
  #945  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
"Bus" usually means 320-series, including 18/19/21.
So is the 330/340 the "big bus," and the 380 "le grande bus?"
iceman49 is offline  
Old 06-26-2014, 03:21 PM
  #946  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post

"Bus" usually means 320-series, including 18/19/21.

Perhaps that's true where you work. Where I work, there are only A300-600s and A310s.

It's like saying the Chevy does this, or the Puegot does that. Many variations, so calling out the model adds clarity.






.
TonyC is offline  
Old 06-26-2014, 03:50 PM
  #947  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Window Seat
Posts: 1,430
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49 View Post
IMHO, automation has saved more lives in the vast scheme of aviation and we should be careful trying to solve a perceived problem by degrading the aircraft automation. Ultimately the issue falls back on the pilots, but the manufactures and training is where it starts.
Sure, it's a great tool to reduce workload (not eliminate it), though many overuse/misuse it. It is not helped by training and policies which encourage that behavior.
aviatorhi is offline  
Old 06-26-2014, 05:40 PM
  #948  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49 View Post
So is the 330/340 the "big bus," and the 380 "le grande bus?"
short/little bus, big bus, and megapoodle?

And "also a bus but not like the others" for the 300/310 for TonyC.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 06-26-2014, 07:43 PM
  #949  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,724
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
short/little bus, big bus, and megapoodle?

And "also a bus but not like the others" for the 300/310 for TonyC.
Any more wing cracks or engine kerfluffles and it will be the blunderbuss. (380)
badflaps is offline  
Old 06-27-2014, 06:01 AM
  #950  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,724
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
That is a different case with A/T not installed. You lose the protections that come from having A/T, but you also aren't tempted in using it as a crutch as well.

One of the highest threats you can have is hand flying with the A/T on in an approach... you have to make sure you're in the desired mode and understand the implications.

Asiana was a text book example of using it as a crutch and thinking it will always be there to help.
When I first checked out on the 767 I loved A/T till the day I flared and put both hands on the yoke and the throttles went right back up to bug. Only happened once.....
badflaps is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ToiletDuck
Safety
5
08-08-2012 09:04 PM
vagabond
Technical
4
12-31-2008 04:13 PM
Piloto Noche
Cargo
46
12-02-2007 10:16 PM
vagabond
Technical
3
09-06-2007 02:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices