Asiana 777 Crash at SFO
#961
"Note: When the pitch mode is FLCH or TOGA, or the airplane is below 400 feet above the airport on takeoff, or below 100 feet radio altitude on approach, the autothrottle will not automatically activate."
#962
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 854
Take a look at the speed plot from the DFDR. They went below bug speed just above 500' AGL. By 100' RA they were so slow that recovery was no longer possible. In fact, they applied full power at about 100' above the water.
#963
....and that is quite a poor design.
#964
Banned
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: A330
Posts: 1,043
I have never tried FLCH inside the FAF though.
I was told by an American instructor in Korea that they know their procedures cold. It is amazing that they did not set the derived decision altitude and that they tried to use FLCH and not V/S or VNAV.
I say this because I shot a VNAV (similar to a V/S) approach the other day when the ILS was OTS for the first time in 6 years on the airplane. It was a non-event. In fact, when we saw the ILS OTS on the atis, the other FO and I said, cool, we get to practice a VNAV for real.
#965
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 854
They didn't really "try" to use FLCH. They briefed and began the approach as a V/S approach. The IOE student got confused while trying to correct for being too high (at a little above 1000' AFL) and hit FLCH. When FLCH caused the airplane to start climbing toward the MCP altitude (3,000') he disconnected the A/P inadvertently put the A/T into HOLD by pulling the thrust levers back to idle manually. The IOE instructor either didn't notice or failed to correct the errors.
#967
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 854
Seems like a LOC-VNAV approach would have been a better plan but that wasn't even brought up during their approach brief. Don't know why.
An IOE student getting crossed up with the automation is a pretty regular occurrence. It's the check airman's job to get him out of it. This guy stayed pretty quiet the whole time. Don't know what he was thinking. By the time the third pilot spoke up it was too late too recover.
#969
Are we there yet??!!
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
#970
Runs with scissors
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,722
A friend of mine also on the 777 said he did turn off the A/T's once for a visual landing. He said it was the hardest landing of his career!
After he told me that (about 5 years ago), I really started paying attention to exactly what the A/T's were doing in the flare, both on hand flown landings and auto-lands. They almost always come fwd about an inch for a little extra thrust as you round out at about 20'.
I'm pretty sure they are tied into the radio altimeter and VVI, as well as the airspeed, but I'm no Boeing engineer so I'm not sure exactly what they are looking at in the last 100'. It does do some of the smoothest auto-lands I've ever seen though, so it's doing something right!
One thing that will ruin a nice smooth hand flown landing though, is the sudden pop-up of the auto-speed brakes, before all 12 main tires are on the pavement, so on my landings, I usually hold the speed brake handle and let it come back slowly, at about half speed, vs. let it pop up and drop us the last 3'.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post