UPS 747 Dubai Final Report
07-26-2013, 12:37 PM
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: FAA ATSI VSRP ERC
Posts: 218
Originally Posted by Ludicrous Speed
I am not implying anything, but could someone elaborate on this?
>80 mg/dL (>17.4 mmol/L) is considered positive for driving under the influence in most states.
07-26-2013, 12:39 PM
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: Pitot heat, what's to eat?
Posts: 392
Originally Posted by Ludicrous Speed
I am not implying anything, but could someone elaborate on this?
About a quarter of the FAA limit (.04%) and a level that would be impossible to detect any impairment. Depending upon when the sample was taken, could also correspond to natural decomposition within the body after death.
07-26-2013, 12:46 PM
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: FAA ATSI VSRP ERC
Posts: 218
Originally Posted by BrownClown
Hahahaha! That's funny! Unless that policy changed yesterday, we carry them everyday.
UPS/ICAO Battery Shipment Regs
Thanks for the correction. I guess I should have done a little more research.
07-26-2013, 02:19 PM
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 747
Posts: 1,290
Originally Posted by BrownClown
Hahahaha! That's funny! Unless that policy changed yesterday, we carry them everyday.
07-26-2013, 02:27 PM
#45
With The Resistance
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Originally Posted by ackattacker
.011% B.A.C.
About a quarter of the FAA limit (.04%) and a level that would be impossible to detect any impairment. Depending upon when the sample was taken, could also correspond to natural decomposition within the body after death.
About a quarter of the FAA limit (.04%) and a level that would be impossible to detect any impairment. Depending upon when the sample was taken, could also correspond to natural decomposition within the body after death.
Several accident investigations have made this clear.
07-26-2013, 02:56 PM
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Seat: Vegan friendly faux leather
Posts: 984
Originally Posted by ackattacker
.011% B.A.C.
About a quarter of the FAA limit (.04%) and a level that would be impossible to detect any impairment. Depending upon when the sample was taken, could also correspond to natural decomposition within the body after death.
About a quarter of the FAA limit (.04%) and a level that would be impossible to detect any impairment. Depending upon when the sample was taken, could also correspond to natural decomposition within the body after death.
If the level was 5 or 6 times that observed amount and sample obtained correctly... well, that would be a different story. Not sure if this article is free outside of university paywall:
Interpretation of postmortem alcohol concen... [Forensic Sci Int. 2005] - PubMed - NCBI
07-26-2013, 05:52 PM
#47
With The Resistance
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Originally Posted by cardiomd
Exactly. That level is immaterial; on autopsy even some pediatric patients have low levels BAC that obviously were not drinking. Decomposition and production by microbes could get to this level, and I would read nothing into it.
If the level was 5 or 6 times that observed amount and sample obtained correctly... well, that would be a different story. Not sure if this article is free outside of university paywall:
Interpretation of postmortem alcohol concen... [Forensic Sci Int. 2005] - PubMed - NCBI
If the level was 5 or 6 times that observed amount and sample obtained correctly... well, that would be a different story. Not sure if this article is free outside of university paywall:
Interpretation of postmortem alcohol concen... [Forensic Sci Int. 2005] - PubMed - NCBI
07-27-2013, 02:52 AM
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: Brown ones
Posts: 216
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Again, for FO low time in type and/or low to the ground, a CA takeover is appropriate (as was the US Airways Hudson case).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
