Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
UPS Accident - BHM >

UPS Accident - BHM

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

UPS Accident - BHM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2013, 06:00 AM
  #301  
Gets Weekends Off
 
lbfowlerjrmd's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: faa sr. medical examiner (HIMS)
Posts: 216
Default

on NP approaches i was always taught to add 2 to 300' to 1st attempt
lbfowlerjrmd is offline  
Old 08-19-2013, 06:10 AM
  #302  
Working weekends
 
satpak77's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 2,384
Default

in laymans non-airbus pilot terms what is the current hypothesis on what happened. sorry for the stupid question but between PAPI angles and V/S mode and everything else, my brain lost focus
satpak77 is offline  
Old 08-19-2013, 06:27 AM
  #303  
Gets Weekends Off
 
lbfowlerjrmd's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: faa sr. medical examiner (HIMS)
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by satpak77 View Post
in laymans non-airbus pilot terms what is the current hypothesis on what happened. sorry for the stupid question but between PAPI angles and V/S mode and everything else, my brain lost focus
imho ... too low too soon.
lbfowlerjrmd is offline  
Old 08-19-2013, 06:37 AM
  #304  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by BRUCE FANZ View Post
I found FAA Advisory Circular AC 120-108 to be a great resource. The AC provides guidance on using continuous decent final approach CDFA or path over VS dive to MDA/DDA. Talks about CFIT too.

While not required,it does say operators should have a CDFA training program. The AC breaks it down into 11 training items. How many of us are getting that training? Here is the link.

http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/m...%20120-108.pdf

We're trained and supposed to use it on all but a few special-case NPA's. It works if ATC allows you to be stable and configured PRIOR to the FAF...otherwise best to just do it the old-fashioned way.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 08-19-2013, 06:44 AM
  #305  
Gets Weekends Off
 
lbfowlerjrmd's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: faa sr. medical examiner (HIMS)
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
We're trained and supposed to use it on all but a few special-case NPA's. It works if ATC allows you to be stable and configured PRIOR to the FAF...otherwise best to just do it the old-fashioned way.
nice refresher ... i keyed in on: Operators should instruct their pilots to initiate the go-around at an altitude above the MDA
lbfowlerjrmd is offline  
Old 08-19-2013, 07:12 AM
  #306  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,096
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
It certainly sounds like there are versions of tailored plates out there for different users.
Looking at the gov't plates - you will see the aforementioned 'When VGSI inop, procedure NA at night.' This is due to 20:1 penetrators (also a reason why no VDA is published)
Looking at the Jepp and NACO versions of the LOC 18 approach chart, a VDA is published (3.28 with a TCH of 40').
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 08-19-2013, 07:24 AM
  #307  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by lbfowlerjrmd View Post
nice refresher ... i keyed in on: Operators should instruct their pilots to initiate the go-around at an altitude above the MDA
On a constant descent, we add 50' to the published MDA and use that as a sort of "DA". Initiating go-around at MDA+50 should keep an RJ (or brasilia) from descending below MDA. I suspect larger aircraft might need a larger buffer due to momentum?
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 08-19-2013, 07:31 AM
  #308  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,096
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
On a constant descent, we add 50' to the published MDA and use that as a sort of "DA". Initiating go-around at MDA+50 should keep an RJ (or brasilia) from descending below MDA. I suspect larger aircraft might need a larger buffer due to momentum?
I don't think so. I did height loss testing on a go-around for KC-10s ... way back when. haha

I believe modern aircraft are certified to lose no more than 50' once the TOGA button is pressed. But I have no source documentation on that so I could be talking crap.

Last edited by KC10 FATboy; 08-19-2013 at 07:49 AM.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 08-19-2013, 07:50 AM
  #309  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy View Post
Looking at the Jepp and NACO versions of the LOC 18 approach chart, a VDA is published (3.28 with a TCH of 40').
Sorry - that was a mistype. It was suppose to be no VDP published.
Yes - the ADVISORY angle is published - note previously mentioned cautions when using.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 08-19-2013, 08:00 AM
  #310  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,672
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
On a constant descent, we add 50' to the published MDA and use that as a sort of "DA". Initiating go-around at MDA+50 should keep an RJ (or brasilia) from descending below MDA. I suspect larger aircraft might need a larger buffer due to momentum?
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy View Post
I don't think so. I did height loss testing on a go-around for KC-10s ... way back when. haha

I believe modern aircraft are certified to lose no more than 50' once the TOGA button is pressed. But I have no source documentation on that so I could be talking crap.
No idea myself. But one aircraft I flew used 75' as the coupled GA loss buffer/addition factor. I thought I was JS'ing on another carrier once and heard the addition of 65' for the type they were on.
John Carr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MD90PIC
Cargo
196
05-24-2021 06:56 AM
Ernst
Cargo
148
07-08-2010 06:04 PM
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Cargo
16
02-18-2009 03:34 PM
jungle
Cargo
0
12-10-2008 06:55 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
23
07-10-2006 06:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices