UPS Accident - BHM
#562
Just going on what has been said around here and a few other places, it doesn't seem like it was anything directly related to an Airbus problem... May end up being the fd mode they were in. Surprised there hasn't been some kind of memo about which way to operate on final though.
#566
My definition of a little bit low must be different than yours.
But I agree, barring further info, this mishap should have never happened.
I think they were more tired than they realized and missed the step down fix. I also wonder if the boss was uncomfortable using VNAV descent guidance or just wanted to practice an old school V/S approach.
As there are in many mishaps, I think the final report is going to have a few if only's in it.
But I agree, barring further info, this mishap should have never happened.
I think they were more tired than they realized and missed the step down fix. I also wonder if the boss was uncomfortable using VNAV descent guidance or just wanted to practice an old school V/S approach.
As there are in many mishaps, I think the final report is going to have a few if only's in it.
#567
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
My definition of a little bit low must be different than yours.
But I agree, barring further info, this mishap should have never happened.
I think they were more tired than they realized and missed the step down fix. I also wonder if the boss was uncomfortable using VNAV descent guidance or just wanted to practice an old school V/S approach.
As there are in many mishaps, I think the final report is going to have a few if only's in it.
But I agree, barring further info, this mishap should have never happened.
I think they were more tired than they realized and missed the step down fix. I also wonder if the boss was uncomfortable using VNAV descent guidance or just wanted to practice an old school V/S approach.
As there are in many mishaps, I think the final report is going to have a few if only's in it.
#568
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 1559
Posts: 1,533
I read earlier that UPS training has been much slower to adopt VNAV guidance and hadn't trained it to the same extent that FDX had. I remember when they rented one of our sims 4 or 5 years ago, they weren't using VNAV guidance whereas it was FDX's standard for a non-precison.
#569
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 404
I read earlier that UPS training has been much slower to adopt VNAV guidance and hadn't trained it to the same extent that FDX had. I remember when they rented one of our sims 4 or 5 years ago, they weren't using VNAV guidance whereas it was FDX's standard for a non-precison.
But they don't have issues with Flaps 15/0 takeoffs in the Bus!
#570
I read earlier that UPS training has been much slower to adopt VNAV guidance and hadn't trained it to the same extent that FDX had. I remember when they rented one of our sims 4 or 5 years ago, they weren't using VNAV guidance whereas it was FDX's standard for a non-precison.
Not true.
A300 FO at UPS.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post