Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
UPS Accident - BHM >

UPS Accident - BHM

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

UPS Accident - BHM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2013, 03:25 PM
  #561  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Position: A320 family
Posts: 44
Default

Is their any scuttlebutt around UPS about what may have happened? My airline as far as i know have heard nothing from Airbus about it.
A306pilot is offline  
Old 12-20-2013, 05:06 PM
  #562  
Gets Weekends Off
 
savall's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: French American
Posts: 417
Default

Originally Posted by A306pilot View Post
Is their any scuttlebutt around UPS about what may have happened? My airline as far as i know have heard nothing from Airbus about it.
Just going on what has been said around here and a few other places, it doesn't seem like it was anything directly related to an Airbus problem... May end up being the fd mode they were in. Surprised there hasn't been some kind of memo about which way to operate on final though.
savall is offline  
Old 01-24-2014, 07:11 AM
  #563  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 332
Default

Hearing on UPS accident on 2/20
aflouisville is offline  
Old 01-24-2014, 10:02 AM
  #564  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 332
Default UPS BHM Accident

The Investigative Hearing will be 0n 2/20/14
aflouisville is offline  
Old 01-24-2014, 12:10 PM
  #565  
Stuck Mic
 
Firsttimeflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,059
Default

After seeing the data at how close you come to that hill even while on glide slope, it would have only taken a little bit low to be a real problem. Tragic loss that should have never happened.
Firsttimeflyer is offline  
Old 01-24-2014, 02:43 PM
  #566  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,418
Default

My definition of a little bit low must be different than yours.

But I agree, barring further info, this mishap should have never happened.

I think they were more tired than they realized and missed the step down fix. I also wonder if the boss was uncomfortable using VNAV descent guidance or just wanted to practice an old school V/S approach.

As there are in many mishaps, I think the final report is going to have a few if only's in it.
kronan is offline  
Old 01-24-2014, 02:49 PM
  #567  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by kronan View Post
My definition of a little bit low must be different than yours.

But I agree, barring further info, this mishap should have never happened.

I think they were more tired than they realized and missed the step down fix. I also wonder if the boss was uncomfortable using VNAV descent guidance or just wanted to practice an old school V/S approach.

As there are in many mishaps, I think the final report is going to have a few if only's in it.
You seem to be following this fairly closely, have their been any changes to the VNAV guidance or minimums on this published approach?
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 01-24-2014, 03:59 PM
  #568  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 1559
Posts: 1,533
Default

Originally Posted by kronan View Post
I also wonder if the boss was uncomfortable using VNAV descent guidance or just wanted to practice an old school V/S approach.
I read earlier that UPS training has been much slower to adopt VNAV guidance and hadn't trained it to the same extent that FDX had. I remember when they rented one of our sims 4 or 5 years ago, they weren't using VNAV guidance whereas it was FDX's standard for a non-precison.
MX727 is offline  
Old 01-24-2014, 04:07 PM
  #569  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 404
Default

Originally Posted by MX727 View Post
I read earlier that UPS training has been much slower to adopt VNAV guidance and hadn't trained it to the same extent that FDX had. I remember when they rented one of our sims 4 or 5 years ago, they weren't using VNAV guidance whereas it was FDX's standard for a non-precison.

But they don't have issues with Flaps 15/0 takeoffs in the Bus!
MEMbrain is offline  
Old 01-24-2014, 05:11 PM
  #570  
Gets Weekends Off
 
L'il J.Seinfeld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Brown
Posts: 1,126
Default

Originally Posted by MX727 View Post
I read earlier that UPS training has been much slower to adopt VNAV guidance and hadn't trained it to the same extent that FDX had. I remember when they rented one of our sims 4 or 5 years ago, they weren't using VNAV guidance whereas it was FDX's standard for a non-precison.

Not true.

A300 FO at UPS.
L'il J.Seinfeld is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MD90PIC
Cargo
196
05-24-2021 06:56 AM
Ernst
Cargo
148
07-08-2010 06:04 PM
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Cargo
16
02-18-2009 03:34 PM
jungle
Cargo
0
12-10-2008 06:55 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
23
07-10-2006 06:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices