Quote:
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
What 752 do we have running 199 seats? I hope I am never on that thing.
Put a 752 on a short route and it burns closer to 8400 lbs an hour. Put a 717 on it and it burns 5700 per hour. Divide it out by the seats and the 752 wins by a 10% margin. 10%? Put a 757 on a typical 717 market and you've just dumped 70 seats into that flight, poof goes that margin to save on one metric of block fuel asm.
The Song 752's held 199, but it was all coach seating.
I was on the jumpseat of one of our brand new 737-900's yesterday, ATL-MCO. FOB for pushback was 14,000. Flight planned block time was 1:03 with a fuel burn of 7,200. 180 passengers (20/160, plus two jumpseaters, me and a F/A in back).
A 752 holds what, about 184? (24/160?)
So, on the same one hour flight, burning 8,400, the company loses 4 F/C seats, but saves 1,200lbs. fuel burn, by replacing the 752 with the 739, which is what they are doing. They still run a lot of 753's on that route at mid day, when the loads are heavier.