09-07-2021Quote:
Human behavior matters, and there's absolutely a psychology aspect to human behavior. Messaging to the public matters when your good-intentioned orders under the auspices of helping the public also harms them, and YES, what our 'betters' do vs. tell us we should do does in fact have an impact on how their requests, pleas, and orders are viewed and complied with...especially after 3/4 of a year.
One might consider that the viewpoint of a 'hoaxer'...but its really the viewpoint of a UCSF infectious disease expert.
Besides, the San Francisco Chronicle isn't exactly a paragon of anti-science, anti-vax, "hoaxer" perspective.
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
Just because you disagree with that POV doesn't mean it isn't credible.Human behavior matters, and there's absolutely a psychology aspect to human behavior. Messaging to the public matters when your good-intentioned orders under the auspices of helping the public also harms them, and YES, what our 'betters' do vs. tell us we should do does in fact have an impact on how their requests, pleas, and orders are viewed and complied with...especially after 3/4 of a year.
One might consider that the viewpoint of a 'hoaxer'...but its really the viewpoint of a UCSF infectious disease expert.
Besides, the San Francisco Chronicle isn't exactly a paragon of anti-science, anti-vax, "hoaxer" perspective.
That’s fine, except that the article offers zero solutions to the problems. That’s called being a hoaxer article. Obviously the solution is not to do nothing either as if everything’s fine. At this point though it’s probably too late to do anything other than just nurse things along until the majority get vaccinated. The time for doing something about it was at the beginning.
