At least we agree on something. I know my first post came off half cocked, and for that, I do deserve a slap on the wrist.

Hmmmm. So it sounds like the pilot went from a tank he knew had fuel, to one that was suspect, because when he switched to a tank he knew had fuel, things started getting worse. Then when tested the airplane, it sounds as if they were able to get it to run with the fuel on board. And they found the selector valve in-between 2 settings. Some one smell an AD coming (as should have already been done due to experience from A&P's fighting this issue). But why were the investigators able to get in running w/out adding any fuel?

Still looking for some guidance on weather I should run for the hills or stand my ground. It sounds like the pilot did everything he should, but was it done properly? The investigators were able to get it running.

Your persistence makes up for your lack of tactfulness. You sound like you're headhunting, go work for the feds.
We can read the preliminary without your Monday morning quarterbacking.

I am not head hunting. I am asking a serious question. I have no knowledge of the way the selector valves work in this airplane and am asking the serious question if it was the fuel valves or the pilot. It sounds like he tried his best to restore engine power, to no avail. So, should I be running for the hills with my tail between my legs? Why else would the fuel valves be taken by the investigators. Mabey I wasn't clear with my post. But it sounds like, and I hate to say it because of my first post, we should all be praising the pilot? Am I wrong? I am simply asking because I don't understand how the fuel system in the airplane works. PM me if you feel it necessary.

If the report is accurate, the left fuel selector was pointed to draw from the left tank (tank-to-engine), but wasn't engaged into the detent. This means that it was still in the crossfeed position, with the left engine running off of the right tank. When the pilot moved the right fuel selector to the left tank (full of fuel), the right engine quit as well.

I believe, and please someone correct me if I'm wrong, but you can't have two engines in crossfeed at one time. With the left engine already in crossfeed (with the pilot unaware), the right engine wouldn't accept a crossfeed to the left tank. I can't tell you why the engines started on the ground with the fuel in the tank, but these engines are very finicky. Perhaps they'd run while on a level ramp, but in the air in a nose-down pitch attitude they wouldn't. Nothing conclusive can be drawn from this yet.

Thank you for the clarification. Not quite time to run yet. But my gut tells me it's comming soon.

Yup you are correct, when the left side was xfeeding from the right tank it cuts off supply from the left tank at the selector where the right xfeed line draws its fuel from. As far as starting on the ground who knows what they were able to do diffently.

Which A&P's are you referring to?

They were able to get the engines running because there was nothing wrong with the engines.

You really are beginning to sound like an ambulance chaser.

Lawyers make me nervous. Just the thought of a lawyer can make me break out in a cold sweat! I think I have PTSD!!! I AM GOING TO SUE!

ARRGGGGHHHHH. I give up. unsubscribing. Never mind that I was here to gain some knowledge.