Cape Air glides into Naples
#21
The media reads these and occasionally they even quote them.
Statements like "I'm raising a huge BS flag. Sorry Cape Air I just don't buy it" are not theorizing or inquiring: they are inflammatory.
By the way according to the report, when it landed, the plane had about 350 lbs (275 lbs plus the 12 gallons) not just 275 lbs.
And thanks, I had a great day
Statements like "I'm raising a huge BS flag. Sorry Cape Air I just don't buy it" are not theorizing or inquiring: they are inflammatory.
By the way according to the report, when it landed, the plane had about 350 lbs (275 lbs plus the 12 gallons) not just 275 lbs.
And thanks, I had a great day
I'm with 172driver, I'd probably fall out of my seat to see any respectable news organization "Quote EWFFLYER off the Airlinepilotcentral forums stated that XXXX". They could say there's plenty of "buzz" on the blogs, but other than that what can they really do that anyone would take seriously???
And now for the bonus round. Even if this plane had only 275lbs(45gallons+ 12), that should've been plenty. What was the reason that the aircraft wasn't able to get that fuel to at least One of the engines?
I understand crossfeeding if there's a slight imbalance etc..., but wouldn't one engine still be able to draw off the tank? If not, and it's pretty obvious that it wasn't, would you have still taken off?
I have many questions, because honestly I'm still having a hard time feeling this one out. I've experience weird fuel problems with the C310's(well just one specific airplane), where when you went to AUX, it didn't do the typical use half, pump the other half out to the main. It never transfered any fuel to the main tank(still in kahoots on this one). Does it make sense....no, did it fly safely....yes......did you really have to pay attention to your fuel loading, definately. I'm just trying to figure out if any of this related to the C402.
And quick question while I have some C402 drivers here. Does the fuel system have only MAIN/Crossfeed/OFF, or is there MAIN/AUX/X-feed/OFF??? Didn't know if it's like the C310 or not. Thanks again.
#22
Anyway no one died! Good job on the pilots part!
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 737FO
Posts: 177
Without having insider knowledge of who the pilot actually was. . .my assumption could be considered a valid point. With your "kind" assistance, I now know my assumption is wrong.
Furthermore. . .I'm stating that despite one's experience level(Cape Air pilot or not), the ability to make snap decisions in a limited amount of time is possible.
What I'm really "knocking" is the media. Obviously you didn't pick up on that.
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 737FO
Posts: 177
Again, I know there is a wide gamut of experience at Cape Air. I didn't read the article.
#26
I haven't flown 402C's in fifteen years! But if I remember correctly each engine had a valve on the floor for left, right and off. Also there was a pull up cross feed shutoff that I don't recall ever using. On the 402C there are just two integral main tanks (wet wings) holding 600 pounds each. It had an extremely accurate capacitance type fuel quantity system.
Anyway no one died! Good job on the pilots part!
Anyway no one died! Good job on the pilots part!
#27
Also some non-pilot types, the kind that wouldn't know an APU from an NG, start threads like this:
http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/ma...-thoughts.html
So if we, "the real experts", start casting doubt on another pilot, the nut cases will come out the woodwork and say "pilots are incompetent, drunken, womanizers." I know that isn't true, almost all of us are competent
#29
Unfortunately, they have quoted or at least paraphrased what has been said on this forum. They do it just like they find a friend's cousin's buddy who has a Tomahawk to be an "expert" on the ditching properties of an Airbus.
Also some non-pilot types, the kind that wouldn't know an APU from an FNG, start threads like this:
http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/ma...-thoughts.html
So if we, "the real experts", start casting doubt on another pilot, the nut cases will come out the woodwork and say "pilots are incompetent, drunken, womanizers." I know that isn't true, almost all of us are competent
Also some non-pilot types, the kind that wouldn't know an APU from an FNG, start threads like this:
http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/ma...-thoughts.html
So if we, "the real experts", start casting doubt on another pilot, the nut cases will come out the woodwork and say "pilots are incompetent, drunken, womanizers." I know that isn't true, almost all of us are competent
You know, for some reason im still amazed that these huge news organizations backed by even bigger corporations can't or won't get reputable aviation experts on when something happens. I know that eventually most of them dig someone up, but in the mean time, don't speculate. I don't speculate about what women think because I have no clue whats going on in there,.
Last edited by F172Driver; 01-29-2009 at 04:17 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post