12,500+ required for type. The -300 is over, the -200 is not.

Thanks, I should probably re-read my posts before hitting submit.

Yeah the king air I was referring to is a 300 and it's 14,000 lbs I think. The job is part 91..flying about 200 hrs a year right seat...I think 32K pay. I'm thinking it'd be a great learning time but I wanted to double check it's legitmate multi/turbine and SIC time to be logging.

I saw one argument about the "SIC required" on the PIC's type would obviously make it ok...Kind of like the Beech 1900C I believe which can be single pilot operated but has the same stipulations...and I don't think many would want to fly that a long way single pilot.

I guess SIC time in a King 300 or 350 only is legitmate SIC time and not in a C90 or 200?!?

-200 or -90 time SIC time is legit, provided your company's ops specs require one and you have passed a 135 checkride in the aircraft.

135 operations: You are not allowed to even manipulate the flight controls unless you work for that carrier and is current and qualified in that specific aircraft. A training flight (logable) will be Part 91, followed by the 135 proficiency check and line check. After that, a company check airman will most likely fly with you: If you received a 135 SIC ride, then log SIC. If it was a 135 PIC ride, then log PIC.

Part 91 operations: Log whatever you want. It is your logbook but don't be surprised if asked to justify (by the FAA or its representative) how your flight time can be used towards a certificate or rating and/or currency.