Quote:
Originally Posted by birdstrike
Okay Falconjet, point taken. I guess you're one of those guys that never makes a typo, sinks below the DA, misses a radio call or makes any mistakes for that matter. But then again you didn't get the job, did you. Hey, I'm just passing on the best information I have. A good friend of mine interviewed with SWA twice. On the first, the focus of the interview turned to the 737 rating. During the later, HR literally told him that he was wasting their time showing up for the interview a second time without the type rating. Maybe things have changed, I sure hope the have.
Strike: I posted a first hand account of my interview experience that was 180 degrees out from the stuff you reported you heard from someone else. I didn't think that was good gouge, so I responded. Normally I don't bash people on their spelling, but if you try to read your first post you will have to agree that it is pretty hard to follow.
Getting career advice on a web board is hard at best, and you need to take everything with a grain of salt. I would tend to go with those who at least were able to pound out a coherent response to the question.
I apologize for using your typing skills to emphasize the fact that your info could be suspect. So could mine, that is for the readers to determine, but I think that my experience is more than validated by the responses of several other posters.
Yes I make mistakes and yes I even miss radio calls once in a while. But I do try to proof read my posts and try to ensure they make sense before I hit the submit reply button. I am by no means perfect, nor was I trying to imply that I was. I was simply cautioning the original poster about the dubious nature of rumors about SW's interview process.
By the way, I somehow passed the interview, got the continue letter, and waited 25 months for a class date. During that time I was lucky enough to find other employment and decided that I should stay there rather than jump ship to SW.
I didn't have the type when I interviewed, and I don't recall the subject coming up, and certainly not to any extent implied by your post. I have no idea what the process is like anymore, but I doubt that it has changed that much.
Why would they interview folks without the type if they were then going to turn around and make it an issue in the interview?
I don't know either.
Anyway, good luck to the original poster, I hope your interview goes well, SW is a great company.
FJ