Quote:
Originally Posted by busdriver12
Nothing wrong with being skeptical. However, if it is not going to be a positive for us, why would anyone at all, much less a majority.....vote yes? You think they can somehow intimidate or scare us into voting for something worse, when the company is making an awesome profit? Don't think a single person could be suckered in that direction. There is zero incentive for us to agree on something that isn't significantly better than what we have. Absolutely none. Proposing something worse than what we have would just **** us off, and the negotiating committee should know better than to even bother presenting it to us.
1) We are not in contract negotiations. There is no reason for the company to give us anything, unless it is to their benefit.
2) The company won't agree to anything that isn't a win for them and a loss for us. If it saves the company money at our expense, it's not a win-win. If it costs the company money, they will simply tell us, "that's nice, see you in a few years".
3) We have voted for bad deals before. I am pretty sure the last time we voted no was 1998. Since then, the pilot group has proved over and over that group think makes us stupid.
4) It seems to me, we are doing the due diligence that should have been done before or during the last negotiations. Too bad that "train has left the station".
5) Put me down as being very skeptical.