The Forbidden Discussion - Unions & Skywest
#111
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: lav dumper
Posts: 707
So all your posts here are strictly in the interests of your stock in SKYW? And you you do the same for the other companies' stock you own?
You sure do spend a lot of your time, just here, defending your company management considering you are so sure their pilots don't want a union.
You sure do spend a lot of your time, just here, defending your company management considering you are so sure their pilots don't want a union.
#112
Banned
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: systems analyst
Posts: 757
Even the anti union Skywest guys who read all that crap have to admit it was ridiculously childish. It literally seems like a 12 year old kid is sitting at his keyboard. Maybe the dude is at summer camp now and we can have an adult conversation.
I'm interested in the conflict of interest bit. Is it worse to have regional alpa? (Which could be mitigated by an in house union), or have Sapa which is paid by management.
I believe sapa is a textbook definition of conflict of interest.
Not that this is exactly the same, but the flight attendants at my current airline get bent over pretty regularly on re routes because they don't have a union. They have no work rule protection, and yet they won't unionize because there is a big counter union campaign constantly being pushed. It's not a good or bad thing as I respect and understand the company's goal of maximizing profits, it's just interesting.
I'm interested in the conflict of interest bit. Is it worse to have regional alpa? (Which could be mitigated by an in house union), or have Sapa which is paid by management.
I believe sapa is a textbook definition of conflict of interest.
Not that this is exactly the same, but the flight attendants at my current airline get bent over pretty regularly on re routes because they don't have a union. They have no work rule protection, and yet they won't unionize because there is a big counter union campaign constantly being pushed. It's not a good or bad thing as I respect and understand the company's goal of maximizing profits, it's just interesting.
#113
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
The Forbidden Discussion - Unions & Skywest
My jab at him in that comment is aimed at his time spent on all these Skywest threads considering he allegedly just owns SKYW stock. And the fact that he absolutely does the same for all the other company stocks he owns.
Also, don't dismiss the two ex-Skywest pilots who have also commented and given their opinion now that they have worked at both a non-union and union airline.
#117
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
Actually, majority of the reason I spend time and post here, is because of people like yourself. This is where the action is...Guys like you cannot just walk away from this forum and focus on your own career. Its interesting to watch certain people turn into rabid dogs when anyone dare question union stuff. I don't come here to convince SkyWest pilots to avoid a union, I come here to watch everyone that doesn't work for SkyWest.
Focus on my own career? This concerns my career right now. Not Skywest per se but the airline industry. You are the one who is just a stock holder and incessantly posting on regional airline boards!
#120
Ich bin Pilot von Beruf
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: CRJ Kapitän
Posts: 616
This thread quickly deteriorated into a pile of dung.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post