Search
Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

What its like at Skywest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-2018, 09:21 PM
  #31  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,506
Default

Originally Posted by bradthepilot View Post
The thing I find interesting about many of the arguments for other regionals is that the "Go to <brand X>!" crowd continues to naively assume that the hourly rate is the sole criteria by which SKYW pilots made their choice. It's curious that some people can't accept that other criteria may exist, and instead seem to insist that their own rubric is what everyone else should use.
Pas de tout, mon ami. Chaque une a son gout.

But please tell us by what criteria YOU use to value Skywest above the competition?
Excargodog is online now  
Old 07-10-2018, 09:28 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bradthepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 417
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog View Post
Pas de tout, mon ami. Chaque une a son gout.

But please tell us by what criteria YOU use to value Skywest above the competition?
I've posted that elsewhere here - a quick search would find it. But my criteria are my own and it's not clear why anyone else would be interested in it or why anyone else would try to convince me that I should care more about hourly rates than about not commuting, or care more about bonuses than upgrade times.
bradthepilot is offline  
Old 07-11-2018, 04:14 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 142
Default

I think there is a lot of irony in this conversation. We see what SkyWest did to XJT to grow, once the largest and most respected regionals for years. Noone stays on top forever, I think SkyWest expanded too fast for the current market, the industry is too competative right now, and SkyWest pilots are wising up. They will go the way of XJT sooner than later in my opinion. At least XJT has the CPP and future with United, what does SkyWest have?
JuniorFO is offline  
Old 07-11-2018, 04:18 AM
  #34  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 94
Default

Originally Posted by LRSRanger View Post
Family meant SKW is out of the question for me. Who can support a family on that?
Not to say regional pay doesn’t need to increase, but I was married (wife didn’t work) with a 1-year old in California making first-year, $22/hour, and we made it work. Definitely wasn’t easy, but there’s a way.
jtsastre is offline  
Old 07-11-2018, 04:46 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,729
Default

Originally Posted by bradthepilot View Post
The thing I find interesting about many of the arguments for other regionals is that the "Go to <brand X>!" crowd continues to naively assume that the hourly rate is the sole criteria by which SKYW pilots made their choice. It's curious that some people can't accept that other criteria may exist, and instead seem to insist that their own rubric is what everyone else should use.
That is being diluted by east coast bases.
havick206 is offline  
Old 07-11-2018, 06:44 AM
  #36  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,506
Default

Originally Posted by jtsastre View Post
Not to say regional pay doesn’t need to increase, but I was married (wife didn’t work) with a 1-year old in California making first-year, $22/hour, and we made it work. Definitely wasn’t easy, but there’s a way.
And in 1965, the minimum wage was a buck and a quarter an hour and a gallon of gas cost 29.9 cents too, neither of which has anything to do with appropriate pay today. A municipal bus driver in California today makes more than most newbie FOs at Skywest.

SacRT Employment Opportunities
Excargodog is online now  
Old 07-11-2018, 06:52 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,203
Default

One things for sure. Flying for SkyWest is nothing like what’s portrayed on this forum board...
amcnd is offline  
Old 07-11-2018, 07:13 AM
  #38  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 803
Default

Originally Posted by amcnd View Post
One things for sure. Flying for SkyWest is nothing like what’s portrayed on this forum board...
And one things for sure. Flying for SkyWest is nothing like what’s portrayed by you on this forum board.

You can't deny we are the lowest paid, worst reserve policies, and terrible schedules.

In many respects, Mesa is better.
Check Complete is offline  
Old 07-11-2018, 07:31 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,203
Default

Originally Posted by Check Complete View Post
And one things for sure. Flying for SkyWest is nothing like what’s portrayed by you on this forum board.

You can't deny we are the lowest paid, worst reserve policies, and terrible schedules.

In many respects, Mesa is better.
I’ve flown for Eagle also. Eagle reserve was worse, hotel in training and paid was nice (that was even 20 years ago) trips pay more at SkyWest, but in the end. Every regional, is a REGIONAL!!! Make it fun, enjoy your time there, get to know people, travel, pay the bills, then move on.. then your airline life begins...
amcnd is offline  
Old 07-11-2018, 07:41 AM
  #40  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 94
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog View Post
And in 1965, the minimum wage was a buck and a quarter an hour and a gallon of gas cost 29.9 cents too, neither of which has anything to do with appropriate pay today. A municipal bus driver in California today makes more than most newbie FOs at Skywest.

SacRT Employment Opportunities
I understand your point, but this was in 2012 for me.
jtsastre is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
iahflyr
Delta
10
09-07-2017 04:53 PM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
160
04-28-2008 06:45 PM
Ellen
Regional
15
05-15-2007 09:53 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices