SkyWest to sell ExpressJet to United Airlines
#11
#13
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
How would any of this change how United hires? XJT is getting some 175’s, but why would that change the current CPP? I can see where this is good for the near term future of XJT, but it in no way means that it will lead to a flow agreement or any other increased chance of XJT pilots gaining employment with United Airlines. United wants to pick and choose who they hire. If anyone can actually figure out exactly what they are looking for, they could get rich selling interview preparation classes. The jury is out on that one.
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,022
48 at Mesa and 20 at Republic I think.
All back as leases coming to end and watch for the bigger Ejets order coming .
Lufthansa style all one seniority when the TA comes
76 seaters to 364 seaters all flown by United seniority pilots
There you have your 15000 pilot seniority list
Good for everyone I would say
All back as leases coming to end and watch for the bigger Ejets order coming .
Lufthansa style all one seniority when the TA comes
76 seaters to 364 seaters all flown by United seniority pilots
There you have your 15000 pilot seniority list
Good for everyone I would say
I’m pretty sure it’s only 12 hulls at YX.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#17
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
I'd say the #1 argument for Mgmt not to absorb any pilots, staple or not, is that they lose the benefit of restarting their longevity. Even with a "flow" UAL gets to restart the longevity and all that entails when they join the mainline list. Same as everywhere else.
#19
You can sort of make the case that a staple is sort of fair but the more senior XJT people (the majority of them) will insist on something for their longevity. Established precedent will give them something.
Only way around that would be do like SWA did with tranny... make them an offer they can't refuse, but the company would have to be integral to that (UA-ALPA can't unilaterally shut down the XJT certificate).
#20
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Absolutely. If we absorb the pilots at Xjet it will be a full blown staple and no one could argue otherwise. So if you get hired by UA now you will be senior to all the current Xjet pilots.
Only way around that would be do like SWA did with tranny... make them an offer they can't refuse, but the company would have to be integral to that (UA-ALPA can't unilaterally shut down the XJT certificate).
There is no need for the United to absorb anyone. They can simply hire the pilots that they like in the interview process and move on. I don’t see 70 seat jets at mainline any time soon, but if we did the pilots who currently fly those planes don’t have to come with them. United already owns the metal. It isn’t an airline acquisition that would trigger some sort of pilots come too deal. All they have to do is bring the planes to mainline when the leases to the regionals expire and hire from all available sources accordingly. Not wishing a sharp stick in anyone’s eye, just looking at this from a company or legal point of view.
Only way around that would be do like SWA did with tranny... make them an offer they can't refuse, but the company would have to be integral to that (UA-ALPA can't unilaterally shut down the XJT certificate).
There is no need for the United to absorb anyone. They can simply hire the pilots that they like in the interview process and move on. I don’t see 70 seat jets at mainline any time soon, but if we did the pilots who currently fly those planes don’t have to come with them. United already owns the metal. It isn’t an airline acquisition that would trigger some sort of pilots come too deal. All they have to do is bring the planes to mainline when the leases to the regionals expire and hire from all available sources accordingly. Not wishing a sharp stick in anyone’s eye, just looking at this from a company or legal point of view.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post