Skywest Reducing Flying By 20%
11-10-2022 | 08:43 AM
#21
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,167
Likes: 803
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Not sarcasm, my error. What I meant to say was it was good news for Embraer that their orders are increasing for the Larger E-2 aircraft. Those are also very much over scope for the US regional market but are starting to become successful internationally as alternatives to the smaller Airbus offerings. Orders for the 190-E2 and the larger 195-E2 are picking up, perhaps aided by Airbus’ supply chain problems with the A220.
https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/3...022-deliveries
https://www.reuters.com/business/aer...ir-2022-10-06/
https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/3...022-deliveries
https://www.reuters.com/business/aer...ir-2022-10-06/
Both Embraer and Mitsubishi planned their 70 seat development programs on the premise that the US scope "problem" would be "solved" by the time they got to market, so that US regionals would operate them. My response to that would violate the forum rules, and I'm glad the programs failed.
11-10-2022 | 09:58 AM
#22
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 378
Likes: 16
Yes the 190 series are a whole different animal, and in common use overseas. Not so much in the US, due to falling right into that scope seam.
Both Embraer and Mitsubishi planned their 70 seat development programs on the premise that the US scope "problem" would be "solved" by the time they got to market, so that US regionals would operate them. My response to that would violate the forum rules, and I'm glad the programs failed.
Both Embraer and Mitsubishi planned their 70 seat development programs on the premise that the US scope "problem" would be "solved" by the time they got to market, so that US regionals would operate them. My response to that would violate the forum rules, and I'm glad the programs failed.
But somehow Boeing keeps winning the fleet and type commonality battle by getting orders for it's "best of the 1960s" clapped-out, maxed-out special...
11-11-2022 | 04:24 AM
#23
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 595
Likes: 73
Also, I really think that if the 1968 Frankenstein that keeps ticking in its Max variant weren't so cheap, a US legacy carrier would have placed an E2-195 order by now to fill this growing ~120 seat capacity void at a lower CASM than the regionals are offering. Easy transition when they bring the E175s in house, if necessary...
But somehow Boeing keeps winning the fleet and type commonality battle by getting orders for it's "best of the 1960s" clapped-out, maxed-out special...
But somehow Boeing keeps winning the fleet and type commonality battle by getting orders for it's "best of the 1960s" clapped-out, maxed-out special...
More cumbersome to manage multiple fleet types.
11-11-2022 | 05:07 AM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 257
From: A320 FO
Also, I really think that if the 1968 Frankenstein that keeps ticking in its Max variant weren't so cheap, a US legacy carrier would have placed an E2-195 order by now to fill this growing ~120 seat capacity void at a lower CASM than the regionals are offering. Easy transition when they bring the E175s in house, if necessary...
But somehow Boeing keeps winning the fleet and type commonality battle by getting orders for it's "best of the 1960s" clapped-out, maxed-out special...
But somehow Boeing keeps winning the fleet and type commonality battle by getting orders for it's "best of the 1960s" clapped-out, maxed-out special...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
