Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > SkyWest
Skywest Flight Attendant Lawsuit >

Skywest Flight Attendant Lawsuit

Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest Flight Attendant Lawsuit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2016 | 01:34 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Default Skywest Flight Attendant Lawsuit

Skywest Flight Attendant Lawsuit | Unpaid Wages | ClassAction.org

The brief itself is at http://www.classaction.org/media/pdf...-v-skywest.pdf

So supposedly this suit is right now awaiting the Judge ruling on Skywest's request for dismissal - I don't know when that will happen, or which way the ruling will go. If it's not dismissed, then it will proceed to a full suit.

I've gotta say, the same things apply to us pilots - we get paid for block time, but we have duties before/after flights that are required per the FAR's and we do NOT get paid for those.

Thoughts?
Reply
Old 04-05-2016 | 01:39 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Default

Are the flight attendants at skywest unionized?

Also, this isn't exactly new news, if I recall this is about a year old now. Has something significant changed since? Is the judges ruling on dismissal immanent?
Reply
Old 04-05-2016 | 02:43 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
From: Downward Dog
Default

Even if they win it isn't going to turn out how they are dreaming about.
I wouldn't say retention is on the list of priorities for skyw FA's
Reply
Old 04-05-2016 | 03:02 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WesternSkies
Even if they win it isn't going to turn out how they are dreaming about.
I wouldn't say retention is on the list of priorities for skyw FA's
What does that even mean? Can you explain your point of view a little better?
Reply
Old 04-05-2016 | 03:06 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
From: ERJ CA
Default

While I understand that labor groups can negotiate their rights to overtime and other labor laws, I've never understood how SkyWest can get away with it, given that no legal CBA exists with any of its labor groups. As hourly workers, we should be paid for all duty time, including overtime.
Reply
Old 04-05-2016 | 03:06 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
From: Downward Dog
Default

They churn through FA's.
Reply
Old 04-05-2016 | 03:25 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Lots
Default

Originally Posted by WesternSkies
Even if they win it isn't going to turn out how they are dreaming about.
I wouldn't say retention is on the list of priorities for skyw FA's
Most attendants haven't done their ho(m)ework and then they turn aound and want to get paid. Please
Reply
Old 04-05-2016 | 08:31 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WesternSkies
Even if they win it isn't going to turn out how they are dreaming about.
I wouldn't say retention is on the list of priorities for skyw FA's
If you took two seconds to read the first sentence you would know they were former FAs and a win would be good for the, since it would likely be in the form of back pay.
Reply
Old 04-05-2016 | 09:17 PM
  #9  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,139
Likes: 798
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Blackwing
While I understand that labor groups can negotiate their rights to overtime and other labor laws, I've never understood how SkyWest can get away with it, given that no legal CBA exists with any of its labor groups. As hourly workers, we should be paid for all duty time, including overtime.
Collective bargaining per se does not require a union. A "legal CBA" is one that holds up in court, has nothing to with a union.

But lack of a union makes it easier for a subset of the labor group to challenge the validity of the "arrangement". Easier, but no slam dunk. They have to claim that their interests were not adequately represented, ie that the "representative group" which "negotiated" the contract is controlled by the company.
Reply
Old 04-06-2016 | 04:49 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 1
From: Downwind, headed straight for the rocks, shanghaied aboard the ship of fools.
Default

Pathetic. Suing an employer for paying you according to the work rules you agreed to work under when you took the job? Simply and utterly pathetic.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jetnfast
Military
52
02-28-2014 09:14 AM
Past V1
Major
10
01-04-2013 03:31 PM
jban642
Hangar Talk
3
09-11-2009 01:42 PM
vagabond
Hiring News
4
04-08-2009 08:03 AM
MobiusOne
Foreign
12
05-09-2008 09:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices