Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
which is best regional if targeting SWA ? >

which is best regional if targeting SWA ?

Search
Notices

which is best regional if targeting SWA ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2018, 09:59 AM
  #61  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,488
Default

Originally Posted by fenix1 View Post
Thanks a lot and I appreciate it. Biggest draw to Horizon is that it’s the only western wholly-owned regional, but the flying also sounds really challenging (plenty of weather and unique approaches).
In this context "wholly-owned" is not a plus. In fact, it's probably a minus.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-06-2018, 11:51 AM
  #62  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: Middle
Posts: 43
Default

There was a horizon guy in my class. To my knowledge where you come from isn't nearly as important as the qualifications you have. In other words pic pic pic
Swingline78 is offline  
Old 06-06-2018, 10:37 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 385
Default

Interesting perspective - thank you - but can you please explain & elaborate further? Please note that I’m not necessarily disagreeing, but instead I’m genuinely interested in better understanding where you’re coming from here!

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
In this context "wholly-owned" is not a plus. In fact, it's probably a minus.
fenix1 is offline  
Old 06-06-2018, 10:40 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 385
Default

Good to know and thank you, but how long ago was that? (ie, is SWA still on-board with turboprop hours today or has the continued proliferation of RJ’s changed SWA’s perspective on folks with a lot of turboprop time?)

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I don't think it has to do with props. If anything SWA seems to be more inclined to hire prop trash than most other majors. They sure hired a lot SKW brasilia drivers.
fenix1 is offline  
Old 06-06-2018, 10:41 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 385
Default

I appreciate it a great deal. Do you mind if I ask how long ago you were in class with SWA?

Originally Posted by Swingline78 View Post
There was a horizon guy in my class. To my knowledge where you come from isn't nearly as important as the qualifications you have. In other words pic pic pic
fenix1 is offline  
Old 06-07-2018, 06:56 AM
  #66  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: Middle
Posts: 43
Default

Originally Posted by fenix1 View Post
I appreciate it a great deal. Do you mind if I ask how long ago you were in class with SWA?
Less than a year.
Swingline78 is offline  
Old 06-07-2018, 11:23 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 385
Default

Thanks a lot

Originally Posted by Swingline78 View Post
Less than a year.
fenix1 is offline  
Old 06-08-2018, 08:52 AM
  #68  
Strike averted!
 
at6d's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: B737
Posts: 3,690
Default

In many ways, the turboprops are more difficult to fly than the jets and have different challenges.

In this scenario, it’s still 121 turbine PIC time.

That being said, experience in a variety of 121 aircraft would always be good for an applicant.
at6d is offline  
Old 06-08-2018, 11:46 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 385
Default

Horizon is moving toward having a split fleet (Q400's & E175's) that could be a great thing (2 type ratings if things go well), but there's been some messy in rolling out the E175's (more 175's than planned have ended up with SkyWest instead of Horizon) so I'm curious to see how this actually plays out.

Personally, I love the idea of flying the Q400's with Horizon (no shiny jet syndrome here) and my only concern is making sure I wouldn't be hurting my ability to get hired after that at a major or legacy. I've heard many share the same perspective that you did below - turboprops are a real challenge, especially on the Cat III approaches in weather that Horizon flies - but I can see major/legacy hiring authorities being concerned about the slower speeds of turboprops (ie, greater training risk) & hiring pilots with all RJ time instead (which is in no short supply clearly).


I appreciate your help and insight.

Originally Posted by at6d View Post
In many ways, the turboprops are more difficult to fly than the jets and have different challenges.

In this scenario, it’s still 121 turbine PIC time.

That being said, experience in a variety of 121 aircraft would always be good for an applicant.
fenix1 is offline  
Old 06-09-2018, 04:07 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: 737 right
Posts: 285
Default

Originally Posted by hoover View Post
Isn't silver shrinking? I don't see them lasting that much longer but who knows.
They are getting a brand new fleet of ATR-42’s and maybe 72’s. Not sure how they will staff them, but it will be better than the Saab.
moflyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MD11
Regional
138
06-26-2014 02:02 PM
flyou11
Regional
11
07-18-2012 04:53 PM
groovinaviator
Regional
24
02-11-2008 03:34 PM
papacharlie
Regional
39
01-27-2008 05:01 PM
AFPirate
Regional
6
11-26-2007 11:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices