Search

Notices

Swa etops?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-2018 | 11:50 AM
  #41  
Line Holder
20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 410
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets

ETOPS checks a pretty comprehensive and would not be accomplished in less than an hour. Southwest quick turns to and from the islands will not be possible.
UAL does GUM-Japan ETOPS turns with about an hour on the ground in Japan. From the time we block in until having our maintenance release is about 30 minutes.

Perhaps 30 minute turns won't happen but having an hour on the ground is plenty for our operation.
Reply
Old 12-01-2018 | 07:19 PM
  #42  
HalinTexas's Avatar
Feeling blessed.
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 564
Likes: 6
From: Happily coasting in the left seat until it ends.
Default

Whether it takes 90 or 10 minutes for a PDSC is immaterial. What the FAA says it will take is what counts. No official table-tops have occurred.

APU will be running from engines start to EXP. OPS SPEC for APU reliability is expensive and might come later.

We strictly are following what the two principle ACs say in the matter of ETOPS certification. We are neither under nor over doing it.

We have rather difficult Feds to deal with. Not to mention we are at the end of the year and scheduling Fed time is difficult.

Tech Ops has the most difficult job.
Reply
Old 12-01-2018 | 08:11 PM
  #43  
Klsytakesit
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Took us 7 years to get the APUOD program and it is expensive. Alaska claims it is worth it but it cant be much more than break even. Best part of it is the APU’s are so well maintained that we never see APU inop mel’s
Reply
Old 12-03-2018 | 04:05 AM
  #44  
joepilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
From: 747 Captain (Ret,)
Default

Originally Posted by Klsytakesit
Took us 7 years to get the APUOD program and it is expensive. Alaska claims it is worth it but it cant be much more than break even. Best part of it is the APU’s are so well maintained that we never see APU inop mel’s
I don't know what the full hourly costs (to include maintenance and overhaul) of the 737 APU are, but the full cost is probably in the area of double the fuel cost.

The biggest cost of the continuously running APU is for flights that routinely depart at max structural gross weight. Then you have to reduce payload (pax) by the weight of the APU fuel burn planned. Call it 1? 2? pax kicked off for each hour of planned APU operation. Depending on ticket prices, this can add up fast.

Joe
Reply
Old 12-03-2018 | 08:26 AM
  #45  
HalinTexas's Avatar
Feeling blessed.
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 564
Likes: 6
From: Happily coasting in the left seat until it ends.
Default

Planned burn for ETOPS is about 350 lbs. total. (Straight from the flight plan)

One turn back and burn off to get below MLW would very cost prohibitive.

Planned icing encounter, which must be accounted for in planning, can be more than fuel burn.

The APU Ops Spec, is very expensive because the aircraft that are to be designated have to be continuously monitored and managed. That is, they have to be routinely started inflight while domestic. Record-keeping for and the management of ETOPS aircraft is the difficult part, by far. One mistake can be extremely costly even if no one is hurt or aircraft is damaged.

MAX performance much better than the NG and there only 28 or so to be used.

Last edited by HalinTexas; 12-03-2018 at 08:28 AM. Reason: Content
Reply
Old 12-03-2018 | 08:28 AM
  #46  
at6d's Avatar
— No Relief On Scope —
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 4,532
Likes: 306
From: B737 Left Seat
Default

SWA is going to pursue ETOPS despite naysayers. Sorry.
Reply
Old 12-03-2018 | 09:39 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Default

We have APU on demand at UAL and we operate over 350 737s. Really not all that hard to track. From time to time, we get a message asking for a reliability start enroute on a domestic leg. We cold start it when conditions are met and send a code and it gets logged appropriately. Easily accomplished. We send the MAX-9 to HNL occasionally but I've never flown anything to the islands but the NG (and of course the 757-300 and 767-400 years ago)
Reply
Old 12-03-2018 | 03:00 PM
  #48  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 149
Default

Originally Posted by at6d
SWA is going to pursue ETOPS despite naysayers. Sorry.
Sorry? No is saying you not pursuing it. We are just wondering when you are ever going to get it.

News flash, you were suppose to be selling tickets by now.

I for one can't wait to hear cowboys on HF.. :"YeeHaw, This is Souwest737, we runn'in a little late, request block 320-360 direct HNL"
Reply
Old 12-03-2018 | 03:28 PM
  #49  
ROFF's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 460
Likes: 2
Default

They will be using CPDLC

So it's unlikely you'll hear requests for anything on the HF

But if you ask nice I'll give you a Yee haw on 10048.

Ass
Reply
Old 12-03-2018 | 03:32 PM
  #50  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 149
Default

Originally Posted by ROFF
They will be using CPDLC

So it's unlikely you'll hear requests for anything on the HF

But if you ask nice I'll give you a Yee haw on 10048.

Ass
Thanks, I had no idea CPDLC worked 100% of time. Oh wait, it doesn't

Signed,
Someone who actually flies ETOPS.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sr. Barco
Southwest
44
10-12-2011 07:39 PM
Bloodhound
Fractional
14
03-10-2008 03:57 PM
Metal121
Major
20
02-04-2008 08:31 PM
Bristol
Hangar Talk
1
05-15-2006 11:37 AM
HalinTexas
Major
8
12-24-2005 10:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices