Search

Notices

Plotting?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2019 | 09:06 AM
  #11  
HalinTexas's Avatar
Feeling blessed.
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 564
Likes: 6
From: Happily coasting in the left seat until it ends.
Default

Originally Posted by BAFlightTEST
This place amazes me sometimes....We have a ton of qualed ETOPS guys here but they were in the wrong squadron to help re invent the wheel the TX way. They have CKA who have never flown ETOPS before teaching other CKA how to do it one or two flights. We need to have RQ pilots who did this day in and day out for years to help. Just one humble civilians opinion...

PS...Yes I did volunteer and so did several other OAK pilots with serious over water time....

PSS... Clutch I can see we used to drive some of the same metal years ago...SAT
You sir, don’t know what you are talking about. I was in on it from the beginning. We are a new operator to ETOPS. We took the existing IFOM and dove-tailed in the two relevant AC’s. That’s it. Yeah, eventually we’ll probably go to electronic plotting, but the reliability of iPads and the storage of electronic records needs to remedied first. And we might go to “on-demand APU ops, but it takes an Ops Spec or two, and we want to start this year. Tech Ops had the hardest job. Why make it harder?

The B737 is NOT a great ETOPS airplane, but you go with what you got.

As far as CKAs doing the checking? That’s the seniority system. CKAs are captains that have applied to be CKAs. There are numerous experienced FOs and a few CAs that can do it, but they don’t want to commute or live in California. Again, you go with what you’ve got.

There seems to be a lot of “tech-cedure” circulating as well. All you need to know or procedures to follow are in the IFOM. Don’t make it hard.
Reply
Old 05-23-2019 | 06:54 PM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Default

I completely agree with Halin - the dudes that set-up our etops program did not come from "the squadron", and imo - they got it right. I've been around almost 3 decades and can attest firsthand to some of the stupid things we've done. This isn't one of them. The training was great and the several crossings I've done were, procedurally very clean and straightforward.

It amazes me how many mainline aircraft (UA/DL) are out there making HF position reports still.
Reply
Old 05-23-2019 | 08:22 PM
  #13  
ClutchCargo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
From: Retired FDX MD11 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by 4thLevel
I completely agree with Halin - the dudes that set-up our etops program did not come from "the squadron", and imo - they got it right. I've been around almost 3 decades and can attest firsthand to some of the stupid things we've done. This isn't one of them. The training was great and the several crossings I've done were, procedurally very clean and straightforward.



It amazes me how many mainline aircraft (UA/DL) are out there making HF position reports still.


I’m guessing that it was because they were having CPDLC problems.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 05-24-2019 | 08:46 AM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 274
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by ClutchCargo
I’m guessing that it was because they were having CPDLC problems.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
UAL does still plot. We make position reports on certain fleets because the CPDLC isn’t Satcom.
Reply
Old 05-24-2019 | 10:08 AM
  #15  
ClutchCargo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
From: Retired FDX MD11 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by McNugent
UAL does still plot. We make position reports on certain fleets because the CPDLC isn’t Satcom.


Our CPDLC will revert to HF datalink if Satcom is not working. I didn’t realize that wasn’t standard...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 05-24-2019 | 11:01 AM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 274
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by ClutchCargo
Our CPDLC will revert to HF datalink if Satcom is not working. I didn’t realize that wasn’t standard...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I can’t speak to the 737 “Guppy” fleet, but that was the deal with our 757-300’s. It apparently sent out some sort of nuisance message to ATC if we attempted the VHF logon going to Hawaii.
Reply
Old 05-25-2019 | 09:52 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,348
Likes: 332
Default

Originally Posted by BAFlightTEST
This place amazes me sometimes....We have a ton of qualed ETOPS guys here but they were in the wrong squadron to help re invent the wheel the TX way. They have CKA who have never flown ETOPS before teaching other CKA how to do it one or two flights. We need to have RQ pilots who did this day in and day out for years to help. Just one humble civilians opinion...

PS...Yes I did volunteer and so did several other OAK pilots with serious over water time....

PSS... Clutch I can see we used to drive some of the same metal years ago...SAT

"Oahu Center.... hello?"


"Oahu Center, how do you read?"


"They're not responding. Try it on HF."


Reply
Old 05-27-2019 | 04:26 AM
  #18  
Al Czervik's Avatar
You scratched my anchor
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 74
Default

Originally Posted by HalinTexas
The B737 is NOT a great ———- airplane, but you go with what you got.
FIFY........
Reply
Old 06-01-2019 | 04:35 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Default

HAL finally does. Took us a decade to get a working tablet. I’m assuming that was our hold up, but I had nothing to do with the approval.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlyHigh423
Technical
8
04-01-2012 04:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices