Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
Is it about time to make an offer to spirit? >

Is it about time to make an offer to spirit?

Search
Notices

Is it about time to make an offer to spirit?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2020, 06:05 PM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,613
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
Put the MAX issue aside for a moment. Do you think WN+NK would get approved under normal circumstances? Public outcry for cheap seats and consumer advocacy groups going up in arms about reduced competition, etc etc.

Now imagine a somber Gary Kelly in front of regulators stating they have no choice but to buy NK and diversify their fleet. Looks better for everyone involved and guaranteed there wouldn't be a peep from anyone to fight the merger.

The MAX debacle serves as the perfect scapegoat for eliminating a competing carrier through a merger.
Exactly. Not to mention that SWA & NK are the darling of “cheap seats”.

That tie up would be approved lickity split. So would JBA & SWA, although there’d be some friction with FLL.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 01-21-2020, 06:23 PM
  #112  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,615
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
Put the MAX issue aside for a moment. Do you think WN+NK would get approved under normal circumstances? Public outcry for cheap seats and consumer advocacy groups going up in arms about reduced competition, etc etc.



Now imagine a somber Gary Kelly in front of regulators stating they have no choice but to buy NK and diversify their fleet. Looks better for everyone involved and guaranteed there wouldn't be a peep from anyone to fight the merger.



The MAX debacle serves as the perfect scapegoat for eliminating a competing carrier through a merger.


Maybe not Spirit, but Allegiant is starting to make an awful lot of sense.... virtually zero overlap.
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Old 01-21-2020, 06:48 PM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,845
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
Put the MAX issue aside for a moment. Do you think WN+NK would get approved under normal circumstances? Public outcry for cheap seats and consumer advocacy groups going up in arms about reduced competition, etc etc.

Now imagine a somber Gary Kelly in front of regulators stating they have no choice but to buy NK and diversify their fleet. Looks better for everyone involved and guaranteed there wouldn't be a peep from anyone to fight the merger.

The MAX debacle serves as the perfect scapegoat for eliminating a competing carrier through a merger.

I can see F9 and NK merging. Other than adding a fleet type, I don’t think either really have any added value besides removing a competitor that really doesn’t have anywhere near the market share. I think it’d be a waste of money.

I could see B6 if we wanted to increase our NYC/Caribbean market.
flyguy81 is offline  
Old 01-21-2020, 07:06 PM
  #114  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 289
Default

Originally Posted by Macjet View Post
What an interesting change. Southwest needs Spirit (or Frontier, jetBlue, or Allegiant) and not the other way around. We have our growth, an order book, and full airplanes. If WN wants NK and there's no conceivable way a current NK pilot could be involuntarily displaced into your flying museum relic then I don't care who the paychecks come from.

But if Captains are displaced to the right seat or the 73 then I'd fight it every conceivable way possible.
Haha! I’m guessing the vote would be 10,000 to 2,500. And not in your favor.
WhaleSurfing is offline  
Old 01-21-2020, 08:28 PM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dingo222's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 555
Default

Originally Posted by WhaleSurfing View Post
Haha! I’m guessing the vote would be 10,000 to 2,500. And not in your favor.
I’m guessing you have no idea how seniority list integration and mergers work.
dingo222 is offline  
Old 01-21-2020, 08:44 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,845
Default

Originally Posted by dingo222 View Post
I’m guessing you have no idea how seniority list integration and mergers work.
If you did straight DOH, NK is on the losing end. No way you get relative seniority where a 2010 hire is placed before a 1995 hire. The only thing NK brings to the table is airplanes, which we couldn’t use for years anyway. There’s no reason to merge or buy anybody unless the Max never comes back.
flyguy81 is offline  
Old 01-21-2020, 09:02 PM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dingo222's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 555
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy81 View Post
If you did straight DOH, NK is on the losing end. No way you get relative seniority where a 2010 hire is placed before a 1995 hire. The only thing NK brings to the table is airplanes, which we couldn’t use for years anyway. There’s no reason to merge or buy anybody unless the Max never comes back.
and that is my point. It’s not about we bought you, etc. This about something Southwest has never done before. To acquire another fleet type will take a minimum of a year. Southwest has to develop their own program within their FOM, develop their own procedures, proving runs etc. You just don’t buy a certificate and transfer it over. It’s a new type on certificate.

jb is the biggest. They have two types. So let’s use them as an example. So you have to develop at least one type certificate. That’s year 1. Now you have to look at the pipeline. Even if all of jb got stapled and every sw pilot became an airbus captain, that is 8 years to transition. That is 8 years of stagnation for everyone and a cost outside of the purchase that may approach a billion, before everyone crosses certificates to become one. Morris air, ATA, AirTran were easy compared to actually buying an airline and operating that type for revenue.

wait it out and tell Boeing to discount the planes or change sw culture and costs forever and buy a new type? That’s a fairly difficult question and I’m sure the bean counters and working on it. Pilots don’t win in that scenario for sure. My .02
dingo222 is offline  
Old 01-21-2020, 09:06 PM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,735
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy81 View Post
If you did straight DOH, NK is on the losing end. No way you get relative seniority where a 2010 hire is placed before a 1995 hire. The only thing NK brings to the table is airplanes, which we couldn’t use for years anyway. There’s no reason to merge or buy anybody unless the Max never comes back.
Spirit would be on the losing end no matter how you do it. An early 2011 hire at Spirit puts them at 380 out of 2500. Is a 2011 hire at SWA even a CA yet?
Silver02ex is offline  
Old 01-21-2020, 09:25 PM
  #119  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 289
Default

Originally Posted by dingo222 View Post
I’m guessing you have no idea how seniority list integration and mergers work.
Yeah, I kind of do.
WhaleSurfing is offline  
Old 01-21-2020, 10:30 PM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,845
Default

Originally Posted by dingo222 View Post
wait it out and tell Boeing to discount the planes or change sw culture and costs forever and buy a new type? That’s a fairly difficult question and I’m sure the bean counters and working on it. Pilots don’t win in that scenario for sure. My .02
Exactly why I’m guessing Gary and Co are waiting it out and didn’t go on a spending spree last spring. If the plane was scrapped last year they’d have done something. Since there’s no indication it won’t fly again, they’re just making do with lemons until they can flip the switch and get back to business. Prob serious talks in the boardroom about what to do if it gets grounded again though.
flyguy81 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UAL T38 Phlyer
United
24
12-28-2023 09:38 PM
suppakuppa
Flight Schools and Training
31
02-06-2018 04:17 PM
Chimpy
Spirit
4
05-10-2017 08:52 AM
RJ85FO
Regional
34
04-17-2017 04:16 PM
nwa757
American
178
01-10-2015 10:54 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices