Quote:
I agree with you 100%, and I think most everyone does. There’s probably more to the story on that comment, if I had to guess. Originally Posted by RckyMtHigh
Interesting take. I feel the opposite is true. One of the reasons I came here was I saw it as a healthier lifestyle. AM or PM trips, staying in roughly the same time zone, and no redeyes keeps my circadian rhythm in sync with home life. Poor diet is something I manage on my own. I rarely see a layover less than 14 hours and always have a chance for a workout. Duty days mostly in the range of 9 hours, sometimes much less but very rarely 10 or more. I saw SWA flying to be more sustainable and healthier in the long term than international and night flying. I’m no doctor, but that’s the first time I’ve heard the argument that international flying is healthier than domestic.
I flew long haul for 13 years, and it was awesome. And exhausting. My body clock was in constant flux, and my first 2-3 days home were spent readjusting back home. I can just imagine how fun that would be with my young kids excited to see me after 5-10 days on the road, and I need to sleep for 6 hours during playtime.
I’ve seen 2 overnights less than 14 hours in 4+ years. And my duty days are in the 8-9 range. And I average 2.75 legs/day. The 4-5 legs/day comments about SWA flying is really focusing on specific routes, not the entirety of the network.
I chose domestic flying, because of the health benefits & the lifestyle overall. Not knocking anyone else’s dreams, planes, schedules, companies, etc... but domestic flying has been everything I was hoping for, especially in regard to how easy it works with my personal life.
For those out there reading these comments in these forums, please take every one of them (including mine) with a grain of salt. There’s been some real head scratchers in here lately.