Notices

Pilot ETO Program

Old 03-28-2020, 07:37 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Position: 737
Posts: 190
Default

Originally Posted by saab2000 View Post
I would certainly hope that furloughs would be a desperate measure of last resort and that other alternatives like early retirements, reduced guarantee (with a snapback date and retroactivity), etc. would be explored first.
My guess is that early retirements are much more valuable at other airlines since it reduces displacements between fleet types--especially when the retirements are mainly from fleets that won't fly again soon in any case. Alas, at SWA, there's little cost to downgrading a bunch of captains and furloughing FOs--maybe two months of furlough pay and 15 trips of right seat pay for the downgrade. The SWA CEO is an accountant first and foremost---who realizes quickly that there's not much money saved by offering early retirements.
Bwipilot is offline  
Old 03-28-2020, 11:05 PM
  #22  
Strike averted!
 
at6d's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: B737
Posts: 3,593
Default

But the majority of those furloughed up to 20% of the list would be like 4-5 year FO pay. Early out for the top ten percent would still be cheaper, no?
at6d is offline  
Old 03-29-2020, 05:20 AM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 85
Default

Originally Posted by at6d View Post
But the majority of those furloughed up to 20% of the list would be like 4-5 year FO pay. Early out for the top ten percent would still be cheaper, no?

A talked to a Chief in Dallas on one of my sits last trip about this. He said the problem with early retirements is most of those guys participate in the Top Hat program, which I believe is company managed. If they retire, the company has to distribute that, which is many, many millions. Never thought of that.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Twinjetav8r is offline  
Old 03-29-2020, 05:51 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,375
Default Pilot ETO Program

Originally Posted by Twinjetav8r View Post
A talked to a Chief in Dallas on one of my sits last trip about this. He said the problem with early retirements is most of those guys participate in the Top Hat program, which I believe is company managed. If they retire, the company has to distribute that, which is many, many millions. Never thought of that.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Idiot conversations like this are why I never ask a Chief about anything not related to their actual job.
That is the dumbest reason I have ever heard. That top hat money is accounted for on the balance sheet and while the company is "holding it", it isn't theirs and never will be.

Early retirements would be a good fit to save money. Buy guys off at the top of the list for a good price. They lose their 1600 sick bank that they had planned on burning down and go home and collect a check and wait for the market to eventually bottom out and come back with a vengeance. Win win.
Here is the problem: pilots at SWA are just another employee. What you offer to one employee at SWA, you have to offer to everyone. We would have to name a new VP to invent a program for everyone and give it a different acronym than every other airline.
The other problem is that the company absolutely refuses to own the poor decision to overman the pilot group despite every indicator and line pilot saying it was a terrible idea. Remember a few months ago when everyone was in disbelief on how overmanned we were? That's when we had 87 percent load factors. That poor planning decision is currently costing them millions of dollars a month. Who will suffer the consequences for that? Hint...look in the mirror.
e6bpilot is offline  
Old 03-29-2020, 06:17 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,546
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot View Post
Idiot conversations like this are why I never ask a Chief about anything not related to their actual job.
That is the dumbest reason I have ever heard. That top hat money is accounted for on the balance sheet and while the company is "holding it", it isn't theirs and never will be=12pt.
Au contraire! Top Hat money can be theirs if things got bad enough and they declared bankruptcy. That’s a pretty doom & gloom scenario but I’m just playing devils advocate.

To look at this scenario through very bullish glasses, perhaps they don’t want to give early outs (just yet) so that when things come roaring back they’ll have the man power and MAXes to really grab some extra market share. I don’t know. Crazier things have happened in this industry.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 03-29-2020, 07:00 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,375
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER View Post
Au contraire! Top Hat money can be theirs if things got bad enough and they declared bankruptcy. That’s a pretty doom & gloom scenario but I’m just playing devils advocate.

To look at this scenario through very bullish glasses, perhaps they don’t want to give early outs (just yet) so that when things come roaring back they’ll have the man power and MAXes to really grab some extra market share. I don’t know. Crazier things have happened in this industry.

Yeah I totally get the Ch 11 scenario. I should have put that out there. Lots of guys put money in top hat back in the day thinking that could never happen. It is a line item on a balance sheet, so it is fair game.
e6bpilot is offline  
Old 03-31-2020, 11:12 AM
  #27  
Line holder
 
symbian simian's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: On the bus,seat 0A
Posts: 3,215
Default

Originally Posted by DHC8DRV View Post
Compared to the offer AA got, this doesn’t even come close. For where I’m at, 5 year FO pay its $3000 less a month.

AA offer of 55 hours a month at 169/hr = $9300
SW offer of 44TFP a month at 143/tfp = $6300

Maybe they think SWAG points will make up for it!!
Spirit is 50 @ $210 = $10.500 (over 95% are captain at year 5, and all can hold it, so I think fair comparison)
symbian simian is offline  
Old 04-04-2020, 07:15 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
THEKERNALKLINK's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Position: 737 LEFT SEAT
Posts: 136
Default LUV our FA's

Originally Posted by ipdanno View Post
The Association was not allowed to help put this together. Offer to help was rebuffed.

I liked reading the FA union response, recommending against taking this.

I hope TOTAL lack of participation from pilots encourages the company to engage with the Association to craft something suitable and detailed.
As much as I love our FA's, I could become one in 2-3 months. If they want as good of a deal as the pilots, then they need to do something that takes a decade of their lives to work towards with no guarantee. It seems like a great opportunity to bounce 1/3 of the senior mama's and papa's (don't forget the "theythey's) and replace them with some Guatemalans who would be glad to do it for $25k/yr, live 8 to a room in the US for half their lives, and the other half as very wealthy people in their home country.

Yes, I am completely heartless when it comes to senior FA's making as much as a 1st year FO, and more than some Captains at the Regional s.
THEKERNALKLINK is offline  
Old 04-05-2020, 02:00 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 268
Default

..
​​​​​​
Liberty is offline  
Old 04-05-2020, 02:41 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
THEKERNALKLINK's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Position: 737 LEFT SEAT
Posts: 136
Default Exactly!

Originally Posted by Bwipilot View Post
My guess is that early retirements are much more valuable at other airlines since it reduces displacements between fleet types--especially when the retirements are mainly from fleets that won't fly again soon in any case. Alas, at SWA, there's little cost to downgrading a bunch of captains and furloughing FOs--maybe two months of furlough pay and 15 trips of right seat pay for the downgrade. The SWA CEO is an accountant first and foremost---who realizes quickly that there's not much money saved by offering early retirements.
The most insightful statement made on this thread so far. The other big 3 have a lot more to gain through early retirements due to the cost of retraining. It's a ripple effect on their entire cost of doing business.
THEKERNALKLINK is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trigg41
Cargo
160
08-04-2014 12:36 AM
mmaviator
Flight Schools and Training
6
07-21-2011 03:36 PM
FDXBUCK
Cargo
22
12-30-2007 08:26 PM
WatchThis!
Regional
70
03-10-2006 09:27 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices