Co-domiciles
04-08-2021 | 04:01 PM
#4
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 38
It would be nice if we could take ground transport if we didn't have to pay for it and also got to keep keep the double DH pay. At our discretion of course.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
04-08-2021 | 05:07 PM
#5
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 101
From: 737 FO
Yea, but then they couldn't reroute you SAN-SEA SEA-OMA to operate one leg OMA-MDW.
04-09-2021 | 04:47 AM
#6
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 502
Likes: 12
When WN previously flew out of IAH and HOU they didn't do the co-domicile so it's unlikely they will do so now. Additionally when OAK opened in 1995 they made a SL to the 1994 CBA that allowed a co-domicile of OAK, SJC, and SFO, they was even a chart showing the TFP between cities if you ended you pairing at a city other than the city you started in. WN never used that provision either. Co-domiciles are a concept that WN Management doesn't understand.
04-09-2021 | 07:48 AM
#7
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 371
Likes: 2
When WN previously flew out of IAH and HOU they didn't do the co-domicile so it's unlikely they will do so now. Additionally when OAK opened in 1995 they made a SL to the 1994 CBA that allowed a co-domicile of OAK, SJC, and SFO, they was even a chart showing the TFP between cities if you ended you pairing at a city other than the city you started in. WN never used that provision either. Co-domiciles are a concept that WN Management doesn't understand.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
