![]() |
Exclusive: Boeing withdraws bid for safety exemption for Boeing 737 MAX 7
https://apple.news/ADtNTsbqgSxK638w8ecT37Q Now what? |
Originally Posted by Traffic Alert
(Post 3760787)
Exclusive: Boeing withdraws bid for safety exemption for Boeing 737 MAX 7
https://apple.news/ADtNTsbqgSxK638w8ecT37Q Now what? Boeing said late on Monday "while we are confident that the proposed time-limited exemption for that system follows established FAA processes to ensure safe operation, we will instead incorporate an engineering solution that will be completed during the certification process." |
Originally Posted by Traffic Alert
(Post 3760787)
Exclusive: Boeing withdraws bid for safety exemption for Boeing 737 MAX 7
https://apple.news/ADtNTsbqgSxK638w8ecT37Q Now what? |
Originally Posted by Traffic Alert
(Post 3760787)
Exclusive: Boeing withdraws bid for safety exemption for Boeing 737 MAX 7
https://apple.news/ADtNTsbqgSxK638w8ecT37Q Now what? |
Originally Posted by ToTheTabs
(Post 3760826)
I was wondering why it was a better solution to design and make all new engine nacelles rather than just installing ice detectors and a AI switch with an "auto" setting.
In the latest SWAPA Number Podcast Case said they were talking about threats to our careers including M&A activity. We are too big to merge with just about anybody, but I wouldn’t be surprised in the least if headquarters wasn’t crossing their fingers and hoping for a Spirit liquidation so they can swoop in and pick up the pieces including a narrowbody replacement for the -7 … (although I think they only have about 15 Airbus 319s, so maybe not.) |
Originally Posted by ToTheTabs
(Post 3760826)
I was wondering why it was a better solution to design and make all new engine nacelles rather than just installing ice detectors and a AI switch with an "auto" setting.
the FAA is the gov on steroids. Way too much involvement. |
Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
(Post 3760931)
Either way it’s at least a 2 year delay in certification. But yes, the “windshield wiper nut” is a really Mickey Mouse ice detector considering actual ice detectors have been in use on airplanes with EICAS since the 1990s.
In the latest SWAPA Number Podcast Case said they were talking about threats to our careers including M&A activity. We are too big to merge with just about anybody, but I wouldn’t be surprised in the least if headquarters wasn’t crossing their fingers and hoping for a Spirit liquidation so they can swoop in and pick up the pieces including a narrowbody replacement for the -7 … (although I think they only have about 15 Airbus 319s, so maybe not.) |
Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
(Post 3761074)
Their 319s are OLD and about to be retired. They only have 320 & 321 NEOs on order so neither of those are a proper replacement for the MAX 7 size wise.
|
Originally Posted by hoover
(Post 3761017)
because if you change anything it's a whole new type certificate. That's what is wrong. You should have to re certify the entire plane if you change a minor detail.
the FAA is the gov on steroids. Way too much involvement. |
Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
(Post 3761109)
Boeing proves we need more government oversight, not less. Boeing can't be trusted to even make minor changes without FAA certification.
The real answer would be to let the free market fix it. If Boeing is threatened with actually losing huge market share to Airbus or even Embraer, they would be motivated to fix everything themselves or go bankrupt. If an airline like Southwest even placed an order with Airbus…or better yet, Embraer, and turned the Duopoly into a Triopoly, it would be the best thing that ever happened to the aviation industry. More choice would mean more efficiency, cheaper prices, better quality, faster production, etc…. Government control is never the answer. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:30 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands