Search

Notices

MAX7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2024 | 05:27 PM
  #61  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 318
Likes: 21
Default

Exclusive: Boeing withdraws bid for safety exemption for Boeing 737 MAX 7
https://apple.news/ADtNTsbqgSxK638w8ecT37Q

Now what?
Reply
Old 01-29-2024 | 06:12 PM
  #62  
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
Line Holder
15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 836
Likes: 27
Default

Originally Posted by Traffic Alert
Exclusive: Boeing withdraws bid for safety exemption for Boeing 737 MAX 7
https://apple.news/ADtNTsbqgSxK638w8ecT37Q

Now what?
Seems like Boeing came up with something better than an exemption...

Boeing said late on Monday "while we are confident that the proposed time-limited exemption for that system follows established FAA processes to ensure safe operation, we will instead incorporate an engineering solution that will be completed during the certification process."
Reply
Old 01-29-2024 | 06:56 PM
  #63  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 74
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Traffic Alert
Exclusive: Boeing withdraws bid for safety exemption for Boeing 737 MAX 7
https://apple.news/ADtNTsbqgSxK638w8ecT37Q

Now what?
I was wondering why it was a better solution to design and make all new engine nacelles rather than just installing ice detectors and a AI switch with an "auto" setting.
Reply
Old 01-29-2024 | 07:59 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 43
From: Gear slinger
Default

Originally Posted by Traffic Alert
Exclusive: Boeing withdraws bid for safety exemption for Boeing 737 MAX 7
https://apple.news/ADtNTsbqgSxK638w8ecT37Q

Now what?
Up to a two year delay in certification. Theres no political at the moment will to offer Boeing a safety exemption for the Max and they know it.
Reply
Old 01-30-2024 | 04:58 AM
  #65  
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
Furloughed Again?!
15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,950
Likes: 110
From: Boeing 737
Default

Originally Posted by ToTheTabs
I was wondering why it was a better solution to design and make all new engine nacelles rather than just installing ice detectors and a AI switch with an "auto" setting.
Either way it’s at least a 2 year delay in certification. But yes, the “windshield wiper nut” is a really Mickey Mouse ice detector considering actual ice detectors have been in use on airplanes with EICAS since the 1990s.

In the latest SWAPA Number Podcast Case said they were talking about threats to our careers including M&A activity. We are too big to merge with just about anybody, but I wouldn’t be surprised in the least if headquarters wasn’t crossing their fingers and hoping for a Spirit liquidation so they can swoop in and pick up the pieces including a narrowbody replacement for the -7 … (although I think they only have about 15 Airbus 319s, so maybe not.)
Reply
Old 01-30-2024 | 06:56 AM
  #66  
hoover's Avatar
At your mom's house
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,719
Likes: 485
From: cpt 737
Default

Originally Posted by ToTheTabs
I was wondering why it was a better solution to design and make all new engine nacelles rather than just installing ice detectors and a AI switch with an "auto" setting.
because if you change anything it's a whole new type certificate. That's what is wrong. You should have to re certify the entire plane if you change a minor detail.
the FAA is the gov on steroids. Way too much involvement.
Reply
Old 01-30-2024 | 07:59 AM
  #67  
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,578
Likes: 288
From: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
Either way it’s at least a 2 year delay in certification. But yes, the “windshield wiper nut” is a really Mickey Mouse ice detector considering actual ice detectors have been in use on airplanes with EICAS since the 1990s.

In the latest SWAPA Number Podcast Case said they were talking about threats to our careers including M&A activity. We are too big to merge with just about anybody, but I wouldn’t be surprised in the least if headquarters wasn’t crossing their fingers and hoping for a Spirit liquidation so they can swoop in and pick up the pieces including a narrowbody replacement for the -7 … (although I think they only have about 15 Airbus 319s, so maybe not.)
Their 319s are OLD and about to be retired. They only have 320 & 321 NEOs on order so neither of those are a proper replacement for the MAX 7 size wise.
Reply
Old 01-30-2024 | 08:05 AM
  #68  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 318
Likes: 21
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
Their 319s are OLD and about to be retired. They only have 320 & 321 NEOs on order so neither of those are a proper replacement for the MAX 7 size wise.
the 319 has a little known LR variant with a 4500nm range and would be perfect.
Reply
Old 01-30-2024 | 08:19 AM
  #69  
2StgTurbine's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 105
Default

Originally Posted by hoover
because if you change anything it's a whole new type certificate. That's what is wrong. You should have to re certify the entire plane if you change a minor detail.
the FAA is the gov on steroids. Way too much involvement.
Boeing proves we need more government oversight, not less. Boeing can't be trusted to even make minor changes without FAA certification.
Reply
Old 01-30-2024 | 08:39 AM
  #70  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
Boeing proves we need more government oversight, not less. Boeing can't be trusted to even make minor changes without FAA certification.
Do you really think the government standing over Boeing’s shoulder verifying that every nut has been torqued is really the answer? All that’s going to do is increase costly delays and make the entire industry less safe and less efficient. While they should be working on a 797, they’re busy spending half a decade trying to get a 737 certified.

The real answer would be to let the free market fix it. If Boeing is threatened with actually losing huge market share to Airbus or even Embraer, they would be motivated to fix everything themselves or go bankrupt. If an airline like Southwest even placed an order with Airbus…or better yet, Embraer, and turned the Duopoly into a Triopoly, it would be the best thing that ever happened to the aviation industry. More choice would mean more efficiency, cheaper prices, better quality, faster production, etc….

Government control is never the answer.

Last edited by Privateer89; 01-30-2024 at 08:49 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yellowNEO
Southwest
96
02-15-2026 04:57 PM
SwaynesWorld
United
27
07-22-2022 09:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices