Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Southwest (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/southwest/)
-   -   When will hiring start back up? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/southwest/150604-when-will-hiring-start-back-up.html)

e6bpilot 08-23-2025 05:32 AM


Originally Posted by ipdanno (Post 3941465)
And a group from post Sep 17, 2008, which swam for 2.5 years. Jake from ‘The Bachelor’ chose to not come here at his 2nd interview, alledgedly.

That's it. 2008. We had some really weird sporadic hiring in the 08-13 timeframe. Similar to today's displacement situation but much, much worse. I had friends (who lived in a base) commuting cross country to Oakland reserve for years. Reserve wasn't commutable so they would finish, have to get a hotel, commute home the next day, spend the next day at home, and then commute back to Oakland the following day and get a hotel. Brutal. We could probably go back and mine some posts from back then to get a little perspective on how bad it was. The industry really is feast or famine and it turns on a dime. Back then, everyone was furloughed, age 65 just became a thing, and nobody was hiring. Now it feels like the opposite and yet we are still in a situation with cross country long term displacements. Crazy.

4V14T0R 08-23-2025 06:16 AM


Originally Posted by flensr (Post 3941448)
I've been getting the feeling that it's the secondary displacements that are causing the most angst. Any other part of our contract, once you're awarded something (a trip, a vacation week, etc) NOBODY can take it from you. But when you bid for a seat in a base, a displaced pilot can TAKE YOUR SEAT. That's a seniority privilege that exists nowhere else in the contract, the ability to simply take an award from another pilot. It makes me feel creepy, to be honest, that we codified in the contract that a single displacement can result in 2 or 3 or more secondary displacements instead of limiting the damage to just one displaced person. We don't do that anywhere else.
Imagine if you had your trip cancelled, if you could just look at the schedule and take someone else's trip and that person would then be involuntarily assigned whatever open trip came up. That's kind of how we do base displacements. Yes it's "seniority", but we did this to ourselves.

How does it work at United, for example, with multiple fleet types and their cascading displacements after 9/11 or the recession? I would imagine similar to ours, go where you can hold and the junior keep getting flushed out. Juniority has always sucked, but we have been making strides to make it a little more palatable (i.e. Reserve, ROR). Things suck when there's no to very little movement. In late 2021 we had guys getting displaced West because the company started upgrading before they started hiring. They couldn't bring back the FO's on EXTO fast enough, because they let so many instructors take VSP. They didn't want to hire with FO's on leave even though that did eventually happen.

Also, at a prior carrier, we essentially had what you're saying we should have here due to the company manipulating language. They forced displacements where ever they wanted. You could be more senior than junior pilots at a base closest to you, but still sent where ever the company needed pilots. The worst example was pilots getting displaced out of an East coast domicile to Hawaii.

e6bpilot 08-23-2025 07:05 AM

As much as displacements suck, I think our current system does a good job of honoring seniority vs ROR.
You will never get kicked out of a base unless there is a negative vacancy. That's fair. Yeah, it does suck to see someone from out of town come in and take your spot, but that only happens when there is a negative vacancy in your base and they presumably got kicked out of their spot as well.

flyguy81 08-23-2025 07:16 AM


Originally Posted by 4V14T0R (Post 3941511)
How does it work at United, for example, with multiple fleet types and their cascading displacements after 9/11 or the recession? I would imagine similar to ours, go where you can hold and the junior keep getting flushed out. Juniority has always sucked, but we have been making strides to make it a little more palatable (i.e. Reserve, ROR). Things suck when there's no to very little movement. In late 2021 we had guys getting displaced West because the company started upgrading before they started hiring. They couldn't bring back the FO's on EXTO fast enough, because they let so many instructors take VSP. They didn't want to hire with FO's on leave even though that did eventually happen.

Also, at a prior carrier, we essentially had what you're saying we should have here due to the company manipulating language. They forced displacements where ever they wanted. You could be more senior than junior pilots at a base closest to you, but still sent where ever the company needed pilots. The worst example was pilots getting displaced out of an East coast domicile to Hawaii.

At UAL they don’t do monthly bids. They do like 4-5 a year because of the training float. Effective date could be months down the road and they’re given pay protection if not in training by a certain date.

During Covid and 9/11, etc they issue a bid with reductions which is similar to a vacancy. Guys might be sitting at home with pay waiting for a training date if their plane is parked or lose their seat/fleet.

Smooth at FL450 08-23-2025 07:17 AM


Originally Posted by e6bpilot (Post 3941527)
As much as displacements suck, I think our current system does a good job of honoring seniority vs ROR.
You will never get kicked out of a base unless there is a negative vacancy. That's fair. Yeah, it does suck to see someone from out of town come in and take your spot, but that only happens when there is a negative vacancy in your base and they presumably got kicked out of their spot as well.

Thats not correct. There does not need to be a negative vacancy in your base to be displaced by someone senior to you who was displaced from theirs.

e6bpilot 08-23-2025 07:24 AM


Originally Posted by Smooth at FL450 (Post 3941531)
Thats not correct. There does not need to be a negative vacancy in your base to be displaced by someone senior to you who was displaced from theirs.

Oh man that blows then. I thought we had fixed that in this contract. So you can still have a +5 in your base and lose your spot if 10 displacements come in?

CA1900 08-23-2025 08:44 AM


Originally Posted by Smooth at FL450 (Post 3941531)
Thats not correct. There does not need to be a negative vacancy in your base to be displaced by someone senior to you who was displaced from theirs.

Correct.

And to add to that, ROR of return does nothing for you until there's a positive vacancy in your ROR base. Month after month, I've been watching people voluntarily bid into the base I got displaced out of, despite having ROR. It's incredibly frustrating.

hoover 08-23-2025 08:52 AM

[QUOTE=flyguy81;3941530]At UAL they don’t do monthly bids. They do like 4-5 a year because of the

Are you getting kicked out of your base?

flyguy81 08-23-2025 01:38 PM

[QUOTE=hoover;3941553]

Originally Posted by flyguy81 (Post 3941530)
At UAL they don’t do monthly bids. They do like 4-5 a year because of the

Are you getting kicked out of your base?

Not yet…this “ATL drawdown” is making a mess of DEN though. Based on the last projection I’ll be in the bottom 20. At one point I had almost 100 below me. They keep this up and I might be commuting by end of the year.

Tinyastronaut 08-23-2025 02:30 PM


Originally Posted by CA1900 (Post 3941547)
Correct.

And to add to that, ROR of return does nothing for you until there's a positive vacancy in your ROR base. Month after month, I've been watching people voluntarily bid into the base I got displaced out of, despite having ROR. It's incredibly frustrating.

yep. I live in Los Angeles and have been commuting to BWI the last year and a half. Kills to see senior people flowing into LA that weren’t even displaced.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:29 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands