Interview? Post your times
#291
On Reserve
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 147
Likes: 44
I think it’s funny even the mods on here are always ****ting on us in our own threads 😆
#292
Not a chance in hell. The FAA process alone would take longer, and then we would need to "Southwest" them and completely modify every single procedure because we think we know a better way. In addition, I think what people don't realize about WB flying is the logistics involved. The passengers are the easy part; it's everything else you need in place to make the operation worthwhile. Heck, we would need to train our ground crews on completely new machines, loading techniques, and software; establish larger cargo and food and beverage contracts; work our pilot and fa contracts to accept them; change our gates; and on and on and on.
Flying them is easy; making them profitable and successful is another animal altogether.
Flying them is easy; making them profitable and successful is another animal altogether.
I wouldn't think they'd announce WB and then say "ok, lets get started ".
allegiant got the 757 up and running in 1 yr.
I'd hope SW would through some resources at it if they wanted to get it done.
As for procedures etc... I have no hope. If anything slows them down or fails all together it will be that department.
The level of BS that comes out of there is mind blowing.
#293
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,182
Likes: 162
I hear what youre saying, but who says SW hasn't been doing all of this already in preparation?
I wouldn't think they'd announce WB and then say "ok, lets get started ".
allegiant got the 757 up and running in 1 yr.
I'd hope SW would through some resources at it if they wanted to get it done.
As for procedures etc... I have no hope. If anything slows them down or fails all together it will be that department.
The level of BS that comes out of there is mind blowing.
I wouldn't think they'd announce WB and then say "ok, lets get started ".
allegiant got the 757 up and running in 1 yr.
I'd hope SW would through some resources at it if they wanted to get it done.
As for procedures etc... I have no hope. If anything slows them down or fails all together it will be that department.
The level of BS that comes out of there is mind blowing.
#294
Viral
Joined: Jan 2025
Posts: 132
Likes: 68
From: The Congo
321 XLR does not have the range to connect many of our bases to EU. My bet is on 787…but what do I know.
This place is changing. You can t stay relevant in 2026 by only flying to LBB. At least they got that.
They got a few rallies scheduled next months. We should know more by then.
This place is changing. You can t stay relevant in 2026 by only flying to LBB. At least they got that.
They got a few rallies scheduled next months. We should know more by then.
#296
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 767
Likes: 221
There’s often some truth to many of the rumors and the 787 rumors have been extensive.
#297
On Reserve
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 184
Likes: 7
From: 737 FO
As an old guy I will tell you if you have more than 5000TT with the prerequisites and you're not getting interviews or offers, it's not your logbook.
#298
On Reserve
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
What is the current new hire timeline from:
- interview date, to
- CJO, to
- class date being offered, to
- first day?
Thank you.
- interview date, to
- CJO, to
- class date being offered, to
- first day?
Thank you.
#299
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,696
Likes: 325
Had a get the interview end of Sept. Interviewed mid-Oct. Heard back 1.5 weeks later. Started class 6 weeks later. So bout 2.5 mos from invite to class.
#300
On Reserve
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Anyone else have a recent timeline they can share? Wondering whether the timeline may have accelerated as hiring ramps up, or maybe even slowed as the schoolhouse fills up. TIA.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



