![]() |
Originally Posted by Timmay
(Post 4025793)
I don't know about the displacements, but there will be nobody getting awarded captain with less than 7.5 years.
I would bet on that. If anyone has plans in the summertime, I would definitely adjust your vacancy bid . Dallas just put something out to the chief pilots mentioning this. |
Originally Posted by e6bpilot
(Post 4025766)
We definitely screwed up on the ROR language. It doesn’t help that they took the biggest base in the system and rapidly shrunk it without much thought being given to comms or the second and third order effects of said shrinkage.
I can’t be mad at anyone for taking a spot in one of those bases…I would do the same in their shoes. If they don’t do it someone else will. It just sucks that you have to have a plus one to get back as a ROR when most of the shifting around happens via secondary vacancies. Crew planning is run by a bunch of morons. |
Originally Posted by flyguy81
(Post 4025739)
1 displaced guy getting in…on a secondary. Nothing makes one sadder than seeing 6 people get in and you’d be one of em if it weren’t for crappy CBA language.
Found my line in the sand for next CBA…. TLDR version, stop going after your fellow pilots and go after the company for the language. |
Originally Posted by 4V14T0R
(Post 4025814)
Explain what you would do with the language to help the displaced people, because everything I've read so far would bite you. If you're a CA you can currently downgrade into your base of choice. If you want all displaced people ahead of anyone new for secondary vacancies you wouldn't be able to downgrade into your base of choice. You would be stuck as a displaced CA. We have got to stop eroding seniority. The only thing to do with the language, in my eyes, is make it more expensive for the company and maybe force them into a different staffing model. On the staffing model front, SWAPA has been talking about scope lately, and one of the things they brought up is how the legacys use block hours for their stafffing model for wide bodies. This is how it should be done. If it were done this way, DEN wouldn't have shrank a fraction of what it did.
TLDR version, stop going after your fellow pilots and go after the company for the language. I have no skin in the displacement game as I am a commuter who has the seniority horsepower to hold pretty much anywhere I want, but the way we are bumping people out of a base and then allowing someone senior to them back into that same base even though they hold “domicile right of return” makes no sense. I would be perfectly fine if I bid into Denver and saw that someone junior to me with DRR got the vacancy and not me. And yeah, the other language needs fixed too. TAD lines, all hotels paid, whatever it takes to make it hurt enough that the company never does Denver again. |
Originally Posted by Timmay
(Post 4025793)
I don't know about the displacements, but there will be nobody getting awarded captain with less than 7.5 years.
|
Originally Posted by e6bpilot
(Post 4025821)
Everybody is sick of hearing about it,
………… |
Originally Posted by e6bpilot
(Post 4025821)
This has been beaten to death, but yeah, displaced pilots should absolutely get in prior to someone coming from another base. It’s domicile right of return, not domicile right of return if you happen to have a positive vacancy showing. Everybody is sick of hearing about it, but we wouldn’t be hearing about it still if the language had been fixed (other than Denver which is an outlier). The way they run it as basically two separate vacancies is baffling and makes no sense unless you consider that they didn’t have to reprogram the computer to do it this way.
I have no skin in the displacement game as I am a commuter who has the seniority horsepower to hold pretty much anywhere I want, but the way we are bumping people out of a base and then allowing someone senior to them back into that same base even though they hold “domicile right of return” makes no sense. I would be perfectly fine if I bid into Denver and saw that someone junior to me with DRR got the vacancy and not me. And yeah, the other language needs fixed too. TAD lines, all hotels paid, whatever it takes to make it hurt enough that the company never does Denver again. |
My thoughts for next language.
nobody gets into a base above a ROR unless the pilot is downgrading into the ROR base. Company must provide positive space to any base for assigned trips for any any pilot with RoR base and hotels for five years. This should be retroactive. It would be a long time before we had new displacements. Their pain = our gain All of this did not affect me but I feel horrible for the Denver guys and my vote will be to protect all us from this ever happening again. |
Originally Posted by hoover
(Post 4025883)
let's remember the guy who wrote the language is a fulll time trip pull union member who takes time off from the union during the summer during his vacation and moves bases to credit 300+ tfp then bid back and goes on full time pull.
He needed to pull that move, for when he interviewed for a VP position with the company. He will fit in well when he moves across the table officially. . |
If anyone wants to see any real changes in the next contract to these items, start by sweeping out the garbage. The pilots that allowed the implementation schedule, the useless right of return language, the 10+ year vacation change timeline... If any of that is important to you, sweep out the garbage. You can find them by looking for the dudes that never fly all year and then pull in 200+ trips in a month in the summer while they "enjoy" their vacation.
Edit: I see was beat to the punch by a few posts 👆 |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:11 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands