SWAPA and SWA have reached an AIP

Subscribe
3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  17 
Page 7 of 18
Go to
As a fifth year, junior FO, I can only hope enough SW pilots truly take the sage advice that the Delta pilots are giving on this thread. Scope is an absolute "no-go" item.

Here is my prediction though, Gary and senior mgmt will eventually throw just enough money at the "problem" to get a 51% vote from the pilot group to get a concession on our scope language. It is futile and noble to think that our pilot group will hold together to make a unified stand in favor of visionary, long term growth.

Historical evidence reveals, the only thing pilots love more than flying airplanes is taking $1 today and giving away the bag of gold tomorrow.
Reply
Quote: Damn right Carl!

If SWAPA gives in on scope you will be FOREVER sorry. Delta has been outsourcing our jobs via the RJs for decades and once out there the line kept moving. First its only 50 seaters, then 70, then 76, then..... Now its our JV agreements. Air France is flying 777s A380s, 747s, Virgin has 74s 787-9s and A340s, while Delta is flying 767s A330s and a handful of 777s and our 747s are going bye bye fast. There is no international growth flying at Delta. The Joint Venture Grievance settlement was a joke. $2500 bucks. Whoop de doo. If you do give in on scope and try to rein it in later you will spend enormous negotiating capital to do it. Do whatever you have to do but don't ever ever give in on scope!! JMHO.
Quote: Guys, please don't make the same mistakes we've made at Delta. There are NO SUCH THINGS as circuit breakers when it comes to scope. Our circuit breakers were called "production balances." ALPA called them "rock solid." The company violated them immediately and continuously. A grievance was filed and our MEC chairman settled it for about $2,500 per pilot (1,200 after taxes and union dues). We gave away untold jobs and growth opportunities for a few thousand bucks.

There are no circuit breakers for scope. There is only scope. You either have it, or you don't.

Carl
I quoted both of these because they bear repeating!!!!

We have fought for scope and exhausted much negotiating capital to get where we are today. In the very last section 6 we strengthened our CBA language regarding scope and it cost us. Why would we turn around and deal it away now? SWAPA needs to learn from the collective hardship of the industry and stand strong on scope. ANY scope erosion is a definite no vote from me, I desperately hope I'm not alone!
Reply
Quote: I quoted both of these because they bear repeating!!!!

We have fought for scope and exhausted much negotiating capital to get where we are today. In the very last section 6 we strengthened our CBA language regarding scope and it cost us. Why would we turn around and deal it away now? SWAPA needs to learn from the collective hardship of the industry and stand strong on scope. ANY scope erosion is a definite no vote from me, I desperately hope I'm not alone!
Not alone Shoelu. We've worked way too hard to let our careers at Southwest be ruined by caving on Scope. I'm willing to listen and learn at the future contract road shows but I don't trust the company at all to live by the terms of any scope agreements much less the "intent and spirit" of such agreements therefore I'm a NO vote on scope relaxation.
Reply
Bring back Herb !!!
Reply
It's pretty simple. The company has a hard-on for "code sharing" "interlining" "marketing agreements" or any other buzzword they can use to describe how they want to gain additional revenue/passengers without using Southwest pilots. As of now they can't do it, so I'm in no rush to be bought off so they can "code share" me out of an upgrade or even a job if we allow them to go far enough.

As of now they also won't be able to operate their new 737 Max come the fall of 2017. "Heart 12" or whatever slogan they want to name it will look really nice parked next to the GO. Maybe they can host their spirit parties in the cabin since it wont be full of southwest customers.

Lastly we need to see "Improvements" in our agreement not concessions. Southwest is making record profits every quarter and even if they weren't near a Billion dollars, the company has never lost a penny. The way the company spins it you would think we are nearing bankruptcy.

Full Retro

Industry Leading wages

No Changes to Section 1

No givebacks

Otherwise it's just another day of Retro Pay!!!
Reply
A little off topic but I just wanted to thank the SW crew who got me home tonight. I'm a Delta Bubba based in ATL, commuting from MCO, Delta hosed me on a 3hr late flight and there was no way I was getting home.... until I ran over to C concourse. The gate agent was great, the flight crew was busy as it was nearly push time, but still welcomed me, and about 5 other jumpseaters, (DL and JB) and the cabin crew was funny goofing on those of us in uniform.

I don't often get to JS on SW, this was only my second time in the past 10 years or so, but both times everyone from the agents to crews were all great.

So thanks for getting me home tonight, whom ever was flying the 6:25pm ATL-MCO.

Oh, and I voted NFW on the DL TA last month, too many concessions, especially in Scope as Carl points out above. I already gave away my retirement and 42% of my pay to 'save Delta' 10 years ago, I'm done giving, it's time we start to restore the profession now that the 8 major airlines have merged into 4 and fuel prices have crashed.
Reply
Quote: Guys, please don't make the same mistakes we've made at Delta. There are NO SUCH THINGS as circuit breakers when it comes to scope. Our circuit breakers were called "production balances." ALPA called them "rock solid." The company violated them immediately and continuously. A grievance was filed and our MEC chairman settled it for about $2,500 per pilot (1,200 after taxes and union dues). We gave away untold jobs and growth opportunities for a few thousand bucks.

There are no circuit breakers for scope. There is only scope. You either have it, or you don't.

Carl
Yep and Yep----no give on scope----EVER
Reply
Quote: None of this has happened yet. Management announced the deal and SWAPA immediately objected citing a scope violation. The company agreed to cease and desist until the two groups can meet to discuss it. My gut says SWA would never have agreed to halt if they believed they would win this case. Section 1 violations do not get dragged out over years going through the adjudication process. This case will be fast tracked through the system if the company chooses to push the issue. This is a shot across the bow from SWA, be ready for more shenanigans especially if the board of directors or the pilot group send this AIP down the tubes. Those that believe SWA does not indeed know every dirty trick in the management handbook, you are sadly mistaken.

THIS NOT YOUR FATHERS SOUTHWEST AIRLINES ANYMORE!

Are you the same individual that debated with me over the treatment of the AirTran pilots by SWA management and SWAPA? Was it you along with a few others stating the great culture of SWA and your industry leading contract as the primary reason for such poor treatment of those AirTran pilots? What happened?
Reply
Stand your ground on the Scope.
Reply
Quote: Are you the same individual that debated with me over the treatment of the AirTran pilots by SWA management and SWAPA? Was it you along with a few others stating the great culture of SWA and your industry leading contract as the primary reason for such poor treatment of those AirTran pilots? What happened?
Gary Kelly the anti- Herb
Reply
3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  17 
Page 7 of 18
Go to