Section 5: expenses
#2
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Pro:
Hotel buy back went up to $50 from $25
This is current book but the nap rooms are PILOT ONLY! Now let’s get the loud filthy FAs out. No profit sharing I’m not sharing.
Long overnight is now 18hrs block in to block out (yes I understand this may be a con for some). It was a win for the company no doubt so what did we get for it?
Con:
Per diem increases $.02 per year. Really?
No Crew meals
Same uniform allotment instead of a replacement bank or dry cleaning reimbursement
No FAA medical reimbursement
Hotel buy back went up to $50 from $25
This is current book but the nap rooms are PILOT ONLY! Now let’s get the loud filthy FAs out. No profit sharing I’m not sharing.
Long overnight is now 18hrs block in to block out (yes I understand this may be a con for some). It was a win for the company no doubt so what did we get for it?
Con:
Per diem increases $.02 per year. Really?
No Crew meals
Same uniform allotment instead of a replacement bank or dry cleaning reimbursement
No FAA medical reimbursement
#3
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 495
Likes: 1
From: A320 CA
Looks like you may be sharing hotel rooms for a charter. Check out 5.A.2.e.12.
It makes single hotel rooms (5.A.2.d.1.) “preferred” rather than mandatory.
I’m assuming “single hotel rooms” means single *occupancy* hotel rooms.
Could make for some interesting overnights, I guess.
It makes single hotel rooms (5.A.2.d.1.) “preferred” rather than mandatory.
I’m assuming “single hotel rooms” means single *occupancy* hotel rooms.
Could make for some interesting overnights, I guess.
#4
Looks like you may be sharing hotel rooms for a charter. Check out 5.A.2.e.12.
It makes single hotel rooms (5.A.2.d.1.) “preferred” rather than mandatory.
I’m assuming “single hotel rooms” means single *occupancy* hotel rooms.
Could make for some interesting overnights, I guess.
It makes single hotel rooms (5.A.2.d.1.) “preferred” rather than mandatory.
I’m assuming “single hotel rooms” means single *occupancy* hotel rooms.
Could make for some interesting overnights, I guess.
#5
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Looks like you may be sharing hotel rooms for a charter. Check out 5.A.2.e.12.
It makes single hotel rooms (5.A.2.d.1.) “preferred” rather than mandatory.
I’m assuming “single hotel rooms” means single *occupancy* hotel rooms.
Could make for some interesting overnights, I guess.
It makes single hotel rooms (5.A.2.d.1.) “preferred” rather than mandatory.
I’m assuming “single hotel rooms” means single *occupancy* hotel rooms.
Could make for some interesting overnights, I guess.
#6
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 495
Likes: 1
From: A320 CA
I noticed another potential gotcha in the Hotel section.
5.A.2.a.10. Acceptable cost.
Acceptable to whom? The Company, I presume. If this is the case, what’s to keep them from refusing to pay for anything above a Super 8?
5.A.2.a.10. Acceptable cost.
Acceptable to whom? The Company, I presume. If this is the case, what’s to keep them from refusing to pay for anything above a Super 8?
#7
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 495
Likes: 1
From: A320 CA
If it’s not a big deal, then the Company shouldn’t mind changing it, then. Is that what you’re trying to say?
#8
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Again current book. I would think precedent would prevail on this as “metropolitan area” is in there again. Hotels were a cut and paste aside from the long/short hours
#9
the mutual agreement of the Company and the Association Hotel Committee."
I believe that's what they mean by who it is "acceptable to".
#10
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



