|
Originally Posted by otter1
(Post 2525833)
For those who didn't look it up like I did, it's Paul S. talking about if this is voted down, the NMB will be in no hurry to get us back to the bargaining table. We could be on our current contract for a very long time. And the NMB is not on our side. It would be a substantial amount of money, benefits, and scope protection lost during that time. Not good.
If you feel a contract is substandard you shouldn't vote yes on it because you are afraid of the "what if" with the NMB. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 2528869)
Just watched to make sure:
1:10:16 can't call in sick for parents anymore 1:12:00 no more reserve drops those are the only time the word concession was used. This is the video I was watching by mistake. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiPC0r-AIsQ |
[QUOTE=Klsytakesit;2526615]as a lurker from Alaska let me sum up this paragraph. In 2009 and again in 2013 our negotiators played that same video. It worked both times. If you look at our contract today with no scope, no work rules, no productivity enhancements, lagging retirement(in 2009 we handed over our pension for nothing in return) and pay rates that lag 20% behind the big four you would see the results of fear based TA selling....It has cost us as a pilot group more than 100 million in lost wages and retirements.....That is the time value of money[/QUOTE
Thank you! |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:03 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands