Is this thing going to pass??
02-16-2018 | 02:20 PM
#21
On Reserve
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Doesn’t fly RSV to choke on gravy!
02-16-2018 | 02:26 PM
#24
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: I Voted Yes and it Feels Good
That in itself, would mean the world to us "yes" voters.
02-16-2018 | 03:27 PM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Yellow bus
02-16-2018 | 04:46 PM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
02-16-2018 | 05:52 PM
#27
Banned
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
02-16-2018 | 06:43 PM
#28
captain scarlet
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Who needs to know?
I am still in disbelief that this was sent out for a vote.
That's likely the result of exhaustion, NMB pressure and being sued.
Comments like these show some of the loop holes:
"It may be possible to program FLICA to prohibit the Company..."
"The Company indicated they would most likely ..."
"should the Company wish to alter the current buffers, management will need to meet and confer with MEC"
A yes vote will be a grave loss of QOL provisions which will NEVER come back, for our entire careers.
Are we that foolish, shortsighted and weak?
That's likely the result of exhaustion, NMB pressure and being sued.
Comments like these show some of the loop holes:
"It may be possible to program FLICA to prohibit the Company..."
"The Company indicated they would most likely ..."
"should the Company wish to alter the current buffers, management will need to meet and confer with MEC"
A yes vote will be a grave loss of QOL provisions which will NEVER come back, for our entire careers.
Are we that foolish, shortsighted and weak?
02-16-2018 | 06:53 PM
#29
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 164
From: NK CA
I am still in disbelief that this was sent out for a vote.
That's likely the result of exhaustion, NMB pressure and being sued.
Comments like these show some of the loop holes:
"It may be possible to program FLICA to prohibit the Company..."
"The Company indicated they would most likely ..."
"should the Company wish to alter the current buffers, management will need to meet and confer with MEC"
A yes vote will be a grave loss of QOL provisions which will NEVER come back, for our entire careers.
Are we that foolish, shortsighted and weak?
That's likely the result of exhaustion, NMB pressure and being sued.
Comments like these show some of the loop holes:
"It may be possible to program FLICA to prohibit the Company..."
"The Company indicated they would most likely ..."
"should the Company wish to alter the current buffers, management will need to meet and confer with MEC"
A yes vote will be a grave loss of QOL provisions which will NEVER come back, for our entire careers.
Are we that foolish, shortsighted and weak?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
