![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Would you think I’m ridiculous for demanding the company have a CMH base so my sweet a** doesn’t have to commute. The company isn’t going to go out of its way to build commuter lines if they aren’t contractually obligated too. Just like they arnt going to open a CMH base because they arnt obligated to. |
Quote:
|
Beech Nut,
The silent majority agrees with your observations. Unfortunately, many posters here think "PBS rigs" will magically improve things. The company will find a way around that if (...and it's a big IF at this time...) the company and union implement PBS. Your only mistake is this: You brought up a subject that actually affects our pay and QOL. How dare you! ;) Had you brought up Karbon jackets instead, this thread would be 10 pages by now. The spirit group has no patience for things that actually affect their pocketbooks. Reality. |
I'll no longer be feeding the troll Halon as I have him on ignore. I'd advise everyone to do the same. Nothing scares and brings out the ugly side of internet trolls more than being ignored. Their extreme positions and statements are a sad pathetic cry for attention.
"I hope the company makes the trips/lines as miserable as possible since it doesn't say in the contract they have to make any commutable". Yeah, everyone loves a trip that starts at 6 am and ends on day four at 11 PM worth 18 hours. |
Quote:
|
So beech nut thinks I’m a troll because I’m calling him out on him crying that there aren’t commuterlines even though nobody seemed to care about that until now.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Or, perhaps...some of us are less enthusiastic because trip averaging is still in place and the long layover trigger moves from 22 to 24 hours. You could see 10 hour 3 days, or 20 hour 4-days....start late enough on day 1, and you could see 15 hour 4 days. :eek: And, they have an optimizer set to their specs, not ours. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:24 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands