750 flights/day

Reply Subscribe

Page 3 of 54

Last »

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

04-22-2020 | 07:06 AM

#21

senecacaptain

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Nov 2019

Posts: 1,256

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by brokepilot2

I also had over 100 people on a flight just a few days ago, another good sign that not everyone has lost their minds over this.

from where to where. I am curious

04-22-2020 | 07:06 AM

#22

galleycafe

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Dec 2016

Posts: 419

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot

all pax and FAs should be required to wear a mask. This will cut down immensely on pax conflicts on board

This is a lose/ lose proposition. I understand the sentiment, but forcing masks will have the opposite effect.

There will be conflict regardless mask or no mask requirement.

If the mask worked, no one in Asia would ever become sick. They've been wearing them for years.

Plane Coffee

04-22-2020 | 07:20 AM

#23

FNGFO

Line Holder

Joined: Jan 2018

Posts: 1,839

Likes: 3

Quote:

Originally Posted by senecacaptain

from where to where. I am curious

I had 119 and 83 respectively on an LAX turn recently.

04-22-2020 | 07:26 AM

#24

Silver02ex

Line Holder

Joined: Sep 2005

Posts: 1,753

Likes: 20

Quote:

Originally Posted by senecacaptain

from where to where. I am curious

SEA-LAS is booked 127 out of 145 tomorrow (Thursday). go to the employee travel and see for yourself.

04-22-2020 | 07:39 AM

#25

FNGFO

Line Holder

Joined: Jan 2018

Posts: 1,839

Likes: 3

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silver02ex

SEA-LAS is booked 127 out of 145 tomorrow (Thursday). go to the employee travel and see for yourself.

Booked is one thing. How many show is another.

I had 182 booked to Los Angeles. A third no showed. About half no showed for the return trip.

Is NK being forced to refund that or issue a travel credit?

04-22-2020 | 07:46 AM

#26

SAABoroowski

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Mar 2020

Posts: 192

Likes: 0

Also the yield is probably horrendous

04-22-2020 | 07:49 AM

#27

Silver02ex

Line Holder

Joined: Sep 2005

Posts: 1,753

Likes: 20

Quote:

Originally Posted by FNGFO

Those numbers are adjusted as pax cancels or get rebook. So if 10 pax cancels now (for tomorrow’s fight), that number would drop. Which tells me, if it’s booked to 127, those people either want to go or didn’t want to or can’t cancel / rebook.

04-22-2020 | 07:51 AM

#28

SAABoroowski

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Mar 2020

Posts: 192

Likes: 0

That Senecacaptain fellow who constantly throws shade on the LCC model posted this gem. I’m sure blocking the middle seat won’t hurt the legacies, lol

https://paxex.aero/2020/04/lcc-colla...stancing-iata/

04-22-2020 | 07:54 AM

#29

senecacaptain

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Nov 2019

Posts: 1,256

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAABoroowski

Sir, I am just posting articles about impact to the industry. Nothing against any particular model or company.

My apologies

04-22-2020 | 08:13 AM

#30

FNGFO

Line Holder

Joined: Jan 2018

Posts: 1,839

Likes: 3

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAABoroowski

i don’t think 70% is anywhere near our break even point, and NK is probably one of the few airlines that could run 120 pax on a 320 and still at least tread water without increasing ticket prices.

We could probably do that or come close at 90-100 per 320 which is only 3 people in each row of six. That’s if previous break even load reports are accurate and our contract is indeed cost neutral.