![]() |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3468852)
it let me read it the second time I clicked onto it.
|
Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
(Post 3468836)
When UAL and CAL merged, new management flew the sides as separate airlines and grew the cheaper CAL side of the airline. I expect that to happen here as well. JB Management didn’t buy a ULCC to make their costs higher.
|
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3468856)
^^^The very first post on here.
“ we’re sipping that blue juice and goin’ places” -Halon One2One1 |
Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
(Post 3468832)
JB management will not want you to have a new contract. They like having a lower paid pilot group. They will grow the Spirit side of the airline and do everything they can to not allow the two groups to merge, including not negotiating a contract which is the first step.
Don’t expect a new contract anytime soon. The good news is the Spirit side of B6 will grow as much as management can let it and the legacy JB side not so much. |
Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
(Post 3468863)
cool story, but still a paywall
okay….so…. |
Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
(Post 3468832)
JB management will not want you to have a new contract. They like having a lower paid pilot group. They will grow the Spirit side of the airline and do everything they can to not allow the two groups to merge, including not negotiating a contract which is the first step.
Don’t expect a new contract anytime soon. The good news is the Spirit side of B6 will grow as much as management can let it and the legacy JB side not so much. B6's pilot contract says any merger must have a CBA in 6 months or they pay B6 pilots substantial penalties. The Merger language says they have to have a merger close by December or it pays penalties to the NK shareholders. But yeah, I'm sure B6 management will drag it out to save a few pennies on spirit pilots. |
Originally Posted by povertyeagle
(Post 3468960)
Do you intentionally not pay attention?
B6's pilot contract says any merger must have a CBA in 6 months or they pay B6 pilots substantial penalties. The Merger language says they have to have a merger close by December or it pays penalties to the NK shareholders. But yeah, I'm sure B6 management will drag it out to save a few pennies on spirit pilots. |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3468994)
say what now?
|
JetBlue CBA 1.E.2
A single collective bargaining agreement will be negotiated by the pilot groups and the Companies subject to the transaction or their Successor. While such negotiations are ongoing and until a Joint Collective Bargaining Agreement is ratified the status quo as specified in the agree- ment(s) of the impacted pilot group(s) will apply. Each pre-merger carrier shall keep separate flight operations of the carriers and will not transfer or interchange pilots or aircraft between the carriers unless otherwise negotiated and agreed to by the Association, and shall ensure that all Company aircraft on hand or on order at the time of the transaction are operated only by JetBlue Pilots. This will not prohibit the carrier from obtaining a single operating certificate. |
Originally Posted by thecunningone
(Post 3468778)
Anybody know if the NK pilots on the Bus will still be on the bus once the merger happens? Seems like it wouldn't make sense to send a bunch of bus pilots back to get typed/trained on a different aircraft. I know the bus pays the highest at JB
|
Originally Posted by Trylabyte
(Post 3469078)
There's a whole bunch of inbound buses on the way. Who do you think is supposed to push the buttons on them. Jeez man, think
Comes down to the SLI which will be a huge make or break for all of us. I understand his Question. But that’s like step #874 and we are on #1. Long ways to go before the real big ticket items will be addressed. |
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3469120)
well there’s a bunch of 220s inbound too. Someone has to push those buttons. But it all
Comes down to the SLI which will be a huge make or break for all of us. I understand his Question. But that’s like step #874 and we are on #1. Long ways to go before the real big ticket items will be addressed. And here we have another new contestant. |
Originally Posted by Trylabyte
(Post 3469125)
220s are a direct replacement for the 190s this is old old info.
And here we have another new contestant. |
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3469120)
well there’s a bunch of 220s inbound too. Someone has to push those buttons. But it all
Comes down to the SLI which will be a huge make or break for all of us. I understand his Question. But that’s like step #874 and we are on #1. Long ways to go before the real big ticket items will be addressed. |
Originally Posted by Trylabyte
(Post 3469125)
220s are a direct replacement for the 190s this is old old info.
And here we have another new contestant. 100 220s on order. That’s a direct replacement to you? Or is that a net gain of 220s? 46 difference is what 500 or so pilots? 500 pilots who perhaps need a new Type in order to stay in left seat.. hence his question. Nice retort though. |
Originally Posted by Trylabyte
(Post 3469125)
220s are a direct replacement for the 190s this is old old info.
And here we have another new contestant. |
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3469133)
54 190s
100 220s on order. That’s a direct replacement to you? Or is that a net gain of 220s? 46 difference is what 500 or so pilots? 500 pilots who perhaps need a new Type in order to stay in left seat.. hence his question. Nice retort though. |
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3469139)
I know you didn't get to go back beneath Lord Franke like you wanted, but complaining about ~46 net growth airframes at $272 an hour is a very special kind of sand in your V reaction.
|
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3469144)
You’re reading comprehension isn’t so good is it? Show me we where I complained about 46 220s? I could not care less as ill never bid it. And Franke who’s 85 at 51% ownership scared me a lot less than Robin at 100%. And perhaps you’ll be at JetBluew U when we all get indoctrinated with blue juice? Will you be in the corner handing out matching Nikes?
Huh? Robin is the CEO, he does NOT own 100% of JB LOL Do you know what the CEO is for a company?? You seem very confused here |
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3469144)
You’re reading comprehension isn’t so good is it? Show me we where I complained about 46 220s? I could not care less as ill never bid it. And Franke who’s 85 at 51% ownership scared me a lot less than Robin at 100%. And perhaps you’ll be at JetBluew U when we all get indoctrinated with blue juice? Will you be in the corner handing out matching Nikes?
That blue juice line is adorable, but in reality there isn't any blue juice out on the line. But keep being sour about your new reality, although I doubt it will serve you constructively. |
Originally Posted by FlippingCups
(Post 3469154)
Huh? Robin is the CEO, he does NOT own 100% of JB LOL Do you know what the CEO is for a company?? You seem very confused here
with it and show up and fly like a good employee. |
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3469156)
Robin doesn't own 100%. You raised the A220 issue, because you think it's an issue, or you wouldn't have raised it.
That blue juice line is adorable, but in reality there isn't any blue juice out on the line. But keep being sour about your new reality, although I doubt it will serve you constructively. |
Can you guys please stop fighting. We need unity for a sweet contract.
|
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3469144)
And Franke who’s 85 at 51% ownership scared me a lot less than Robin at 100%.
Yeah, no thanks. |
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3469160)
yeha I’m not confused. Just didn’t state it clearly. Apologies. But he mentioned LORD Franke .. the majority stakeholder who owns 51% of the controlling interest is not a lord. And therefore didn’t frighten me. Obviously no CEO is lord .. the shareholders are.. but being owned 100% by jetblue which is led by Robin is more frightening to me. I’ve made it clear I want no part of B6. No apologies there. But being what it is, ill deal
with it and show up and fly like a good employee. |
Originally Posted by Lakeaffect
(Post 3469178)
B6 is led by Robin (for now) controlled by shareholders. ULCC is led by Biffle and controlled by Franke. Franke (Lord) can do whatever he wants since he is the majority shareholder. Robin cannot, he needs BOD and shareholder permission. Your rationale is still flawed
Franke is a cancer. We just avoided that cancer. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3469182)
His rationale is super flawed. Franke controls everything over there, everything. Barry has to ask Franke anything and everything. If anyone thinks having Franke involved in anything is better than JetBlue, you need a wake up call.
Franke is a cancer. We just avoided that cancer. Filler |
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3469160)
yeha I’m not confused. Just didn’t state it clearly. Apologies. But he mentioned LORD Franke .. the majority stakeholder who owns 51% of the controlling interest is not a lord. And therefore didn’t frighten me. Obviously no CEO is lord .. the shareholders are.. but being owned 100% by jetblue which is led by Robin is more frightening to me. I’ve made it clear I want no part of B6. No apologies there. But being what it is, ill deal
with it and show up and fly like a good employee. I gotcha... honestly man, I at first wanted the F9 deal, mostly because the combined order book, but after taking the time and studying alot and talking to people at F9/NK/B6 I came to the conclusion that B6 is a better move for us. My 1st choice obviously would have been stand alone and maybe get new blood in management, get a new CBA and move forward ourselves that way, but that wasnt really going to happen. But, I believe we will be stronger together with B6 in getting a solid contract(really hoping B6 guys are open to wanting our QOL, unlimited drops). There will be 100 A220's coming while they get rid of the 190's. Thats a net gain right there of 40 planes, they have more options with those. That doesnt even include the 320/321. lets not forget our order book too. More importantly, this will be a long process, longer than what most people think. The DOJ approval will be a long one, but it will eventually get approved. I think when the dust settles and lists are merged and run bids etc we are probably looking at 3yrs. But the deciding factor for me was Franke, it is not good working under him. I get your point with the shareholders having their 48 or 49% but honestly, as someone who spent time working for 2 Wall St firms before I came back to flying who currently is an investor in multiple businesses, we shareholders really dont care how the company is run as long as we are making money. Its a different world when you have been on the other side. Blackrock and Vanguard or whoever are looking for returns only, not how Franke/Biffle run the company and treat employees. The horror stories we hear even today at F9 really doesn't matter to any of their shareholders as they just posted a Q2 profit. Ill throw this out there though... Ual, AA, Delta, Fedex, UPS hiring the way they are with their movement, upgrades and retirements there is no reason why people should just pull their apps from them. If you are young(CA or FO) id still leave and go there. Everybody I know that left does not regret that move and they are happier, so nooo you dont have to settle and deal with it. There are so many options today that we have never seen in our lifetime as pilots. Even senior CA's I know here are considering leaving... alot of places can make that pay back within 1-2yrs. |
Well, this is off to a good start. Can we focus on a JCBA instead or is this going to be a year of back and forth of who’s got the bigger …..
|
Originally Posted by IWalkJun12
(Post 3469192)
Well, this is off to a good start. Can we focus on a JCBA instead or is this going to be a year of back and forth of who’s got the bigger …..
|
Originally Posted by ProPilotBlue
(Post 3469001)
I don't see that language anywhere, so I don't know what he's talking about.
|
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3469164)
the other guy brought up the 220 as direct replacement. It’s not. Hence i mentioned the net gain. And thankfully my new reality is a few years away. Adorable response though. Really hope we can fly together someday .
I think your perceptions are warped, and should really try and find the positives, which aren't hard to find. |
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3469238)
Yeah, it's not a direct replacement anymore, it's a growth fleet. Oh the horror! Doesn't anyone care about the children!
I think your perceptions are warped, and should really try and find the positives, which aren't hard to find. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3469264)
I’ll be honest, BlueDriver, you’re starting to grow on me.
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3469264)
I’ll be honest, BlueDriver, you’re starting to grow on me.
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3469264)
I’ll be honest, BlueDriver, you’re starting to grow on me.
|
Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
(Post 3469303)
I told you guys 😂
stuffer |
Originally Posted by FlippingCups
(Post 3469191)
Even senior CA's I know here are considering leaving... alot of places can make that pay back within 1-2yrs.
The captains with seniority that bluster about “considering leaving” or “would have left if frontier deal had gone through” are more full of it than Ted acting like he always had faith in B6 on tv interviews. |
I completely get the Frontier resentment. To completely switch to a one and two day trip mix when 60% of the pilot group commutes is just terrible. Not to mention sick call problems, paying for snacks/flica/non-rev. As well as the Australian and cfi hiring.
|
Originally Posted by Ratm0820
(Post 3469353)
I completely get the Frontier resentment. To completely switch to a one and two day trip mix when 60% of the pilot group commutes is just terrible. Not to mention sick call problems, paying for snacks/flica/non-rev. As well as the Australian and cfi hiring.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:26 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands