Biden Administration Moving to Block Merger
02-18-2023 | 03:05 PM
#53
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 944
Likes: 258
From: A320
Wow, so much for unity when these guys keep winning every negotiation. We surely got them last time and this round. So answer me this, Lets say we go for negotiations and wear a red lanyard , 70% vote yes for another below industry pay, what have we accomplished? 31% actually gives a flying phuk FYI. Fool me once, shame on you....figure the rest. Done with this NK unity crap, good thing we won't have this problem once b6 gets approved ( i hope).
02-19-2023 | 07:18 AM
#54
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 164
From: NK CA
02-19-2023 | 07:30 AM
#55
That/It/Thang
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 3,500
Likes: 362
I’m willing to bet they are a little more invested in getting their own deal vs the short term deal we signed.
02-19-2023 | 07:42 AM
#56
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 164
From: NK CA
Haha. Classic Lincoln. I’m sure AA , SWA and UAL pilots are sitting around laughing at our CBA while they continue to wait for their second TA, or first for SWA.
I’m willing to bet they are a little more invested in getting their own deal vs the short term deal we signed.
I’m willing to bet they are a little more invested in getting their own deal vs the short term deal we signed.
02-19-2023 | 12:57 PM
#57
That/It/Thang
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 3,500
Likes: 362
Tell me you are new without telling me you are new.
And it is a short term. It literally says it on the first few pages, 2 years with early opener or failure of the merger, whatever comes first. Reading is fundamental, total 101 stuff. You might not "like" the deal but it is a short term deal.
02-19-2023 | 01:29 PM
#58
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
And never assume "they will come back with a new deal quick."
Tell me you are new without telling me you are new.
And it is a short term. It literally says it on the first few pages, 2 years with early opener or failure of the merger, whatever comes first. Reading is fundamental, total 101 stuff. You might not "like" the deal but it is a short term deal.
Tell me you are new without telling me you are new.
And it is a short term. It literally says it on the first few pages, 2 years with early opener or failure of the merger, whatever comes first. Reading is fundamental, total 101 stuff. You might not "like" the deal but it is a short term deal.
02-19-2023 | 01:47 PM
#59
Perennial Reserve
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,246
Likes: 257
If the JetBlue deal is not held up in the courts, the JCBA ought to be pretty quick. In addition to the $3.8 Billion JetBlue's paying for Spirit, they have the cost of repainting all the aircraft, new interiors, paying Airbus to convert all those little 319 NEOs into 320s and 321s with different interiors, combining and getting FAA approval on a common training program and common certificate, etc. And to get return on that investment, they NEED a JCBA. It won’t be JB that would benefit by dragging this out - they’ll be losing money if they do. This time the foot-dragging leverage is on the pilot’s side.
02-19-2023 | 01:48 PM
#60
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 164
From: NK CA
And never assume "they will come back with a new deal quick."
Tell me you are new without telling me you are new.
And it is a short term. It literally says it on the first few pages, 2 years with early opener or failure of the merger, whatever comes first. Reading is fundamental, total 101 stuff. You might not "like" the deal but it is a short term deal.
Tell me you are new without telling me you are new.
And it is a short term. It literally says it on the first few pages, 2 years with early opener or failure of the merger, whatever comes first. Reading is fundamental, total 101 stuff. You might not "like" the deal but it is a short term deal.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
