![]() |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 3683386)
Considering both sides and being on reserve myself, I agree with y’all actually. As long as we’re legal for it and it fits in our RAP, we should be good to go. Idk how many times I put in a preference that fit my days perfectly only for CS to give it to someone else. Either that or it gets thrown into the X List because they decided they needed to hold onto more reserves for the next day.
|
Originally Posted by SpeedBrakes
(Post 3682749)
11 from bottom in ORD
Stuck on R3 Reserve. Sucks balls. Used all the time, and getting stuck with all these new hires for Red Eyes. QOL is in the sh|tter!!!! |
Originally Posted by ScopingItOut
(Post 3683614)
Same in DTW forced into bailing to attempt a better QOL. And I'm not the only one leaving DTW.
Management displaced a bunch of pilots, radically changed our trip dynamics, and sold off a bunch of capacity. So now, we've essentially stagnated in the biggest hiring boom this industry has ever seen. |
Originally Posted by LoopsMcDoops
(Post 3683712)
It's really remarkable to me that they chose pilot displacements at this time considering the turnover that's happening in the industry. It's my opinion that our management group is so driven by a spreadsheet that they have tremendously hurt our ability to turn a profit. For example, selling the 319's. Whatever their reason, AA and UA are running around in decades old 319's with CRT screens, much older than ours, and working them hard. I'm sure on a spreadsheet, they saw a way to gain some capital with the sale and remove some maintenance liabilities from the operation too. But, it wasn't too long ago AA was pulling 140's and 145's out of the desert to park on gates in DFW to keep us from growing there. So they sold off some planes, made a few bucks, but now we need them. We're parking planes left and right because of an "unforeseeable" issue with our NEO's. Our management is running away left and right from any competition with the big 4. They've lost their teeth. No bite.
Management displaced a bunch of pilots, radically changed our trip dynamics, and sold off a bunch of capacity. So now, we've essentially stagnated in the biggest hiring boom this industry has ever seen. I’ll also add, they could have deferred these NEOs during Covid but instead committed to taking all of them (they admit now that wasn’t a good decision) while scheduling the 319 returns. So here we are, flying 319s back to the bank while moving brand new Neos to the ramps to sit engineless until 2024 or 2025. |
Originally Posted by skitheline
(Post 3682992)
A couple of trips out of ORD do Caribbean and Central America red eyes. The first day is a late start and the following two days are red eye trips with one last late night back to ORD. Three "nights" in the same hotel in FLL. Worst trip ever.
The way these pairings made you feel was awful. Very unhealthy. |
What did the displacements accomplish exactly? Our DOT performance metrics are as bad as ever. LAS is a staffing quagmire with way more captains than first officers resulting in 40% or greater captains being on reserve in any month.
Now they are saying we are overstaffed for Q1 2024 and forward. I sure hope they offer LOA's so those of us who need a break from this place and its toxic management.
Originally Posted by LoopsMcDoops
(Post 3683712)
It's really remarkable to me that they chose pilot displacements at this time considering the turnover that's happening in the industry. It's my opinion that our management group is so driven by a spreadsheet that they have tremendously hurt our ability to turn a profit. For example, selling the 319's. Whatever their reason, AA and UA are running around in decades old 319's with CRT screens, much older than ours, and working them hard. I'm sure on a spreadsheet, they saw a way to gain some capital with the sale and remove some maintenance liabilities from the operation too. But, it wasn't too long ago AA was pulling 140's and 145's out of the desert to park on gates in DFW to keep us from growing there. So they sold off some planes, made a few bucks, but now we need them. We're parking planes left and right because of an "unforeseeable" issue with our NEO's. Our management is running away left and right from any competition with the big 4. They've lost their teeth. No bite.
Management displaced a bunch of pilots, radically changed our trip dynamics, and sold off a bunch of capacity. So now, we've essentially stagnated in the biggest hiring boom this industry has ever seen. |
Originally Posted by LoopsMcDoops
(Post 3683712)
It's really remarkable to me that they chose pilot displacements at this time considering the turnover that's happening in the industry. It's my opinion that our management group is so driven by a spreadsheet that they have tremendously hurt our ability to turn a profit. For example, selling the 319's. Whatever their reason, AA and UA are running around in decades old 319's with CRT screens, much older than ours, and working them hard. I'm sure on a spreadsheet, they saw a way to gain some capital with the sale and remove some maintenance liabilities from the operation too. But, it wasn't too long ago AA was pulling 140's and 145's out of the desert to park on gates in DFW to keep us from growing there. So they sold off some planes, made a few bucks, but now we need them. We're parking planes left and right because of an "unforeseeable" issue with our NEO's. Our management is running away left and right from any competition with the big 4. They've lost their teeth. No bite.
Management displaced a bunch of pilots, radically changed our trip dynamics, and sold off a bunch of capacity. So now, we've essentially stagnated in the biggest hiring boom this industry has ever seen. I will say I love the new trip mix. It’s much more even and the majority of the pilot group drives to work. We have a reasonable verity now compared to all min credit four days two years ago. |
Originally Posted by Directautogroup
(Post 3683852)
What did the displacements accomplish exactly? Our DOT performance metrics are as bad as ever. LAS is a staffing quagmire with way more captains than first officers resulting in 40% or greater captains being on reserve in any month.
Now they are saying we are overstaffed for Q1 2024 and forward. I sure hope they offer LOA's so those of us who need a break from this place and its toxic management. Normally I would say the paid LOAs we saw during Covid were going to be a once in a career event. But...I could see LOAs for CAs because of this engine issues. Furloughs only makes sense over a certain amount of time, a longer time frame, and we should not see that with these engines. Pratt said they are going to "make Spirit whole", whatever that means, so there would be money coming back (I assume) for the direct result of the groundings. So it would not surprise me to take a few hundred CAs off the books for 4-6 months of 2024 while they deal with this, for some LOA pay, knowing that its cheaper than being over staffed, cheaper than furloughs, and cheaper if you can have a financial line item (LOA pilots on leave cost) to present to Pratt on the economic impacts. As for FOs, still way too much churn with attrition to allow any to take LOAs. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3683983)
Oh man, I would love LOAs.
Normally I would say the paid LOAs we saw during Covid were going to be a once in a career event. But...I could see LOAs for CAs because of this engine issues. Furloughs only makes sense over a certain amount of time, a longer time frame, and we should not see that with these engines. Pratt said they are going to "make Spirit whole", whatever that means, so there would be money coming back (I assume) for the direct result of the groundings. So it would not surprise me to take a few hundred CAs off the books for 4-6 months of 2024 while they deal with this, for some LOA pay, knowing that its cheaper than being over staffed, cheaper than furloughs, and cheaper if you can have a financial line item (LOA pilots on leave cost) to present to Pratt on the economic impacts. As for FOs, still way too much churn with attrition to allow any to take LOAs. A few of us were positing the same thoughts the other day, between NEO engines and then depending on the merger timeline it’s possible there could be over staffing as yellow draws down and pilots and crew are incrementally moved to blue ops. I’d happily sit that out on covid LOA terms and jump on the last car of the train once they have all the kinks worked out. |
Originally Posted by AllOva736
(Post 3680005)
personally, I’ve experienced zero QOL changes. I can drop my whole schedule and rebuild it myself every month without issue. Minimum guarantee, drop to zero and reserve grid protection are contractual so they can’t just be changed or not honored on a whim.
|
Originally Posted by RealEstatePilot
(Post 3703935)
Ive heard of people at the Big 4 doing this for premium pay to boost their credit. Is there actually a monetary benefit to doing it at Spirit, or are you dropping and rebuilding purely for a better schedule?
Every month I usually am awarded 15-18 days off crediting 70-72 hours holding some/most of the days I want off, off. By the end of the month, after rebuilding by entire schedule and listing for premium, I average 18.5 days off and 103 credit on average. Getting EVERY day that I want off, off. |
Originally Posted by RealEstatePilot
(Post 3703935)
Ive heard of people at the Big 4 doing this for premium pay to boost their credit. Is there actually a monetary benefit to doing it at Spirit, or are you dropping and rebuilding purely for a better schedule?
|
Originally Posted by RealEstatePilot
(Post 3703935)
Ive heard of people at the Big 4 doing this for premium pay to boost their credit. Is there actually a monetary benefit to doing it at Spirit, or are you dropping and rebuilding purely for a better schedule?
|
Originally Posted by PossibleDeviation
(Post 3703942)
No other major airline has the reserve grid language or drop-to-zero language that we have at Spirit. Once a lineholder here, there is NO other place to experience the flexibility you have here. Are the other parts of our CBA industry leading? HELL NO. But scheduling flexibility, it is.
Every month I usually am awarded 15-18 days off crediting 70-72 hours holding some/most of the days I want off, off. By the end of the month, after rebuilding by entire schedule and listing for premium, I average 18.5 days off and 103 credit on average. Getting EVERY day that I want off, off. |
Originally Posted by PossibleDeviation
(Post 3703942)
No other major airline has the reserve grid language or drop-to-zero language that we have at Spirit. Once a lineholder here, there is NO other place to experience the flexibility you have here. Are the other parts of our CBA industry leading? HELL NO. But scheduling flexibility, it is.
Every month I usually am awarded 15-18 days off crediting 70-72 hours holding some/most of the days I want off, off. By the end of the month, after rebuilding by entire schedule and listing for premium, I average 18.5 days off and 103 credit on average. Getting EVERY day that I want off, off. |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3704152)
I am senior enough that I get the schedule I want awarded. But when I get calls to work on my days off to work for 200%, I will sometimes say yes, and often drop the next trip to keep days worked same, but still get extra credit. Just got called for an X trip. 42 hours credit, leave Saturday early afternoon, home Monday morning, as a commuter. I have seen plenty of things better at other places. Our premium and commute policy are good....
|
Originally Posted by RealEstatePilot
(Post 3704249)
Does this continue post merger? Would love to see that part of Spirit carry over in a JCBA
It’s a non-starter for NKs NC during negotiations and there is no reason it won’t be the same when the JCBA talks begin. |
Originally Posted by RealEstatePilot
(Post 3704258)
Commute policy is great to hear about. Im an IAH guy but heard thats still pretty senior so it will be the JS for me for a bit if I get picked up.
|
Originally Posted by RealEstatePilot
(Post 3704258)
Commute policy is great to hear about. Im an IAH guy but heard thats still pretty senior so it will be the JS for me for a bit if I get picked up.
You’ll get IAH before you’re completely done with training if you want it. Everyone initially gets LAS, but then next month you should have no issues being able to bid and hold IAH |
Originally Posted by Born2FlyAv8R
(Post 3704371)
You’ll get IAH before you’re completely done with training if you want it. Everyone initially gets LAS, but then next month you should have no issues being able to bid and hold IAH
|
Originally Posted by PossibleDeviation
(Post 3703942)
No other major airline has the reserve grid language or drop-to-zero language that we have at Spirit. Once a lineholder here, there is NO other place to experience the flexibility you have here. Are the other parts of our CBA industry leading? HELL NO. But scheduling flexibility, it is.
Every month I usually am awarded 15-18 days off crediting 70-72 hours holding some/most of the days I want off, off. By the end of the month, after rebuilding by entire schedule and listing for premium, I average 18.5 days off and 103 credit on average. Getting EVERY day that I want off, off. 1) That will all end when JB takes you over. 2) Your QoL comes at a price... about 86.5% of what a Delta pilot enjoys, plus PS. So yes, you probably have more time off, but you're also making a lot less overall, working for about 75% of what the "big boys" make. Money isn't everything, but it DOES pay the bills. As long as one has a separate source of income, your work rules would make for a great way of life! The NK X trips and JB VDA trips are great, once one achieves enough seniority to hold them (requires more seniority at JB than is does at NK). |
Originally Posted by Mach10
(Post 3705990)
"big boys"
|
Originally Posted by Mach10
(Post 3705990)
I love your explanation of QoL benefits at NK, and would love to work under those rules. But there are two counter-points I'd like to make:
1) That will all end when JB takes you over. 2) Your QoL comes at a price... about 86.5% of what a Delta pilot enjoys, plus PS. So yes, you probably have more time off, but you're also making a lot less overall, working for about 75% of what the "big boys" make. Money isn't everything, but it DOES pay the bills. As long as one has a separate source of income, your work rules would make for a great way of life! The NK X trips and JB VDA trips are great, once one achieves enough seniority to hold them (requires more seniority at JB than is does at NK). Not throwing shade, that POV always left me scratching my head |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 3706053)
These arguments are all very interesting. No one at NK is going hungry or homeless for that matter. Everyone enjoys money, but how do you quantify Christmas with the fam, anniversary with the spouse, new years with friends, etc..? Making all that money and no way to enjoy it when it matters most.
Not throwing shade, that POV always left me scratching my head For me personally, I do not live to serve corporate overlords. The beautiful thing about Spirit is you have a choice, though. If you are after money, you can hustle and out-earn your peers at other airlines, or chill out and focus on other things in life. Credit a bunch one month, and go backpack around Europe the next. Just about every pilot I've talked to wishes we'd just stay Spirit. |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 3706053)
These arguments are all very interesting. No one at NK is going hungry or homeless for that matter. Everyone enjoys money, but how do you quantify Christmas with the fam, anniversary with the spouse, new years with friends, etc..? Making all that money and no way to enjoy it when it matters most.
Not throwing shade, that POV always left me scratching my head |
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3706120)
Give me a break. The percentage of NK pilots working Christmas or New Year's, or your wife's anniversary is the same at JB and NK, and directly proportional to the amount of flying each airline does on that day of the year. SOMEONE has to fly Christmas. SOMEONE has to fly New Year's. SOMEONE has to fly weekends. SOMEONE has to fly Oct 11th.
I spoke to a retired UA guy and he said that in his 20+ years at UA, he never got Christmas off. Since only 4 lines had the 25th off, the top 4 pilots in base would get it. At Spirit, I’ve spoken to pilots who are sub 10 years on property holding the major holidays off. I know how QOL is hard to see with all those Benjamins in the way, but it’s there, Bluedriver. |
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3706120)
Give me a break. The percentage of NK pilots working Christmas or New Year's, or your wife's anniversary is the same at JB and NK, and directly proportional to the amount of flying each airline does on that day of the year. SOMEONE has to fly Christmas. SOMEONE has to fly New Year's. SOMEONE has to fly weekends. SOMEONE has to fly Oct 11th.
|
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 3706122)
Of course, but with some seniority, you can play the game and to get those days off. Not even that much seniority either to be able to play said game.
I spoke to a retired UA guy and he said that in his 20+ years at UA, he never got Christmas off. Since only 4 lines had the 25th off, the top 4 pilots in base would get it. At Spirit, I’ve spoken to pilots who are sub 10 years on property holding the major holidays off. I know how QOL is hard to see with all those Benjamins in the way, but it’s there, Bluedriver. |
Originally Posted by Born2FlyAv8R
(Post 3704371)
You’ll get IAH before you’re completely done with training if you want it. Everyone initially gets LAS, but then next month you should have no issues being able to bid and hold IAH
Wonderful QOL from the only airline to displace pilots in what, the last decade? |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 3706122)
Of course, but with some seniority, you can play the game and to get those days off. Not even that much seniority either to be able to play said game.
I spoke to a retired UA guy and he said that in his 20+ years at UA, he never got Christmas off. Since only 4 lines had the 25th off, the top 4 pilots in base would get it. At Spirit, I’ve spoken to pilots who are sub 10 years on property holding the major holidays off. I know how QOL is hard to see with all those Benjamins in the way, but it’s there, Bluedriver. Your own example proves my point. If only 4 lines had the 25th off for this United pilot, only 4 pilots got it off (not counting reserves). If that were ever true at Spirit, the same proportion of guys would HAVE to work Christmas. The flights WILL be covered. The proportion of JB, NK and UAL pilots with Christmas off is the same, and directly proportional to the amount of flying the airline does that day. You're missing a basic understanding of airline scheduling. |
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3706147)
JB 12+ years. Have NEVER worked a Christmas or Easter. I've sometimes CHOSE to work a thanksgiving because I choose, for my own reasons, with my own strategy. I've never worked a 4th of July, although I screwed up my bid (didn't realize it would hit me with a carry-out from June) once and was scheduled to work one, but it was with a check airmen, and was bought.
Your own example proves my point. If only 4 lines had the 25th off for this United pilot, only 4 pilots got it off (not counting reserves). If that were ever true at Spirit, the same proportion of guys would HAVE to work Christmas. The flights WILL be covered. The proportion of JB, NK and UAL pilots with Christmas off is the same, and directly proportional to the amount of flying the airline does that day. You're missing a basic understanding of airline scheduling. |
Originally Posted by vegabondpilot
(Post 3706104)
Just about every pilot I've talked to wishes we'd just stay Spirit. I don’t think this is true at all. I think the vast majority of the pilot group have no confidence in this management group to run an airline, have less than zero interest working for anything owned by indigo and absolutely cannot wait for this merger to close with a JCBA that captures the best of both contracts’ work rules with legacy compensation. No one wishes to stay spirit unless they are age 60+ and don’t need the hassle in the last years before retirement. |
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3706147)
JB 12+ years. Have NEVER worked a Christmas or Easter. I've sometimes CHOSE to work a thanksgiving because I choose, for my own reasons, with my own strategy. I've never worked a 4th of July, although I screwed up my bid (didn't realize it would hit me with a carry-out from June) once and was scheduled to work one, but it was with a check airmen, and was bought.
Your own example proves my point. If only 4 lines had the 25th off for this United pilot, only 4 pilots got it off (not counting reserves). If that were ever true at Spirit, the same proportion of guys would HAVE to work Christmas. The flights WILL be covered. The proportion of JB, NK and UAL pilots with Christmas off is the same, and directly proportional to the amount of flying the airline does that day. You're missing a basic understanding of airline scheduling. I have yet to meet a NK pilot that would prioritize money over QOL. Luckily, our set up allows us to work as little or as much as we want. |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 3706155)
I have yet to meet a NK pilot that would prioritize money over QOL. Luckily, our set up allows us to work as little or as much as we want. That’s no excuse for being compensated less. No excuse! |
I'm one of those people that chooses to work Christmas. I'm single with no kids and a relatively small extended family. We don't do much. As a senior FO I could easily get Christmas Eve off and then whatever pairing I wanted starting Christmas Day. It's one less pilot with a family possibly forced to work on Christmas and I get a little extra pay.
Speaking of pay, one thing that needs to be majorly improved his holiday pay. I think the new United TA is an additional 5 hours and they have several more holidays. |
Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
(Post 3706166)
I want both! The red/green ARBITRATED language is set in store and with DTZ is a non negotiable.
That’s no excuse for being compensated less. No excuse! |
Originally Posted by BusBoi
(Post 3706176)
I'm one of those people that chooses to work Christmas. I'm single with no kids and a relatively small extended family. We don't do much. As a senior FO I could easily get Christmas Eve off and then whatever pairing I wanted starting Christmas Day. It's one less pilot with a family possibly forced to work on Christmas and I get a little extra pay.
Speaking of pay, one thing that needs to be majorly improved his holiday pay. I think the new United TA is an additional 5 hours and they have several more holidays. |
Originally Posted by BusBoi
(Post 3706176)
Speaking of pay, one thing that needs to be majorly improved his holiday pay. I think the new United TA is an additional 5 hours and they have several more holidays.
|
Originally Posted by skitheline
(Post 3706250)
You'll take your 75 bucks and be happy!! Agreed, this needs to change.
I'm also one of those who doesn't mind working the holidays. But, the point was we get a CHOICE. Not everyone wants the same thing. That's the thing that Bluedriver consistently doesn't understand while trying to lecture us about how airline scheduling works. Our scheduling rules are far superior to JetBlue's. He just doesn't get it because he's been Stockholm Syndrome'd into thinking that's how it has to be. |
Originally Posted by vegabondpilot
(Post 3706288)
Our holiday pay is insultingly bad. That definitely needs to change.
I'm also one of those who doesn't mind working the holidays. But, the point was we get a CHOICE. Not everyone wants the same thing. That's the thing that Bluedriver consistently doesn't understand while trying to lecture us about how airline scheduling works. Our scheduling rules are far superior to JetBlue's. He just doesn't get it because he's been Stockholm Syndrome'd into thinking that's how it has to be. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:29 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands