LFG F9Nk
#81
Neeleman seems to have a much better apprasial of the current domestic market than anyone else. His belief is that we'd see something between F9 and NK rates.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/2024/10/17/jetblue-breeze-airways-david-neeleman-southwest-spirit/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/2024/10/17/jetblue-breeze-airways-david-neeleman-southwest-spirit/
#82
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 1
From: Airplanes
Average of F9+NK rates +5% and it passes by 65%+
Or am I supposed to still be laughing over your 'snap up' dreams? What color lanyard will that rally cry be?
#83
Are you under the dilusion that either MEC would present an industry leading, or even industy par, JCBA to the pilot group? And are you further under the dillusion that either group would vote down a subpar JCBA?
Average of F9+NK rates +5% and it passes by 65%+
Or am I supposed to still be laughing over your 'snap up' dreams? What color lanyard will that rally cry be?
Average of F9+NK rates +5% and it passes by 65%+
Or am I supposed to still be laughing over your 'snap up' dreams? What color lanyard will that rally cry be?
I don't want to believe you, but unfortunately I do.
#84
Are you under the dilusion that either MEC would present an industry leading, or even industy par, JCBA to the pilot group? And are you further under the dillusion that either group would vote down a subpar JCBA?
Average of F9+NK rates +5% and it passes by 65%+
Or am I supposed to still be laughing over your 'snap up' dreams? What color lanyard will that rally cry be?
Average of F9+NK rates +5% and it passes by 65%+
Or am I supposed to still be laughing over your 'snap up' dreams? What color lanyard will that rally cry be?
#85
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 1
From: Airplanes
Current legacy A320 12 year rates are topping at nearly $400/hour while NK is $320 and F9 is $270. If you ever think that these two boat anchors of the industry when combined will have parity with any legacy, or even Southwest, then you really need to either step back and assess the industry or reach out to a mental health professional. Either carrier works for a lot of folks but if it doesn't then there is a lot of hiring coming up in the next few years. Ask the guy sitting beside you next time; odds are they've already interviewed somewhere else. Stay or go; it's a decision that we all have to make. But make an honest assessment of what Firit will be and not banging the dillusional drum of snap up or pairty rates.
#86
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 630
Likes: 53
This is true. Sorry F9 boys but your reputation isn’t crapping gold over there either . Spirit was first so the name is synonymous with trash passengers, but let’s not act for a second that Frontier is Delta One over there.
Not a pi$$ing contest but both our pax have no legroom, but at least one has WiFi, and snowless boarding and deplaning.
Both products are outdated and it needs to go away.
Not a pi$$ing contest but both our pax have no legroom, but at least one has WiFi, and snowless boarding and deplaning.
Both products are outdated and it needs to go away.
MCO is one of our largest bases (was the largest for a while till they gutted it by opening several bases at once) and we don't even have a service desk past security. Everyone gets sent back to the ticket counter or is told to text our customer service on whatsapp since we don't even have a phone number anymore... seriously... so it's all a joke. NK has a service desk with 3 employees tending to customers at MCO by their gates. Whatever you're used to get ready for it to be taken a few notches down, unfortunately.
#87
Me pointing out what the MEC(s) will do and how the pilot groups will vote is not me acquising to either mentality. And it isn't my line of thinking; it's the cold hard truth of working for either of these two scumbag airlines. Have you looked around at your company, aircraft, and crew? It is what it is and it certainly pays the bills for a lot of us but it will never be what you see when you look over the ramp at your near peers.
Current legacy A320 12 year rates are topping at nearly $400/hour while NK is $320 and F9 is $270. If you ever think that these two boat anchors of the industry when combined will have parity with any legacy, or even Southwest, then you really need to either step back and assess the industry or reach out to a mental health professional. Either carrier works for a lot of folks but if it doesn't then there is a lot of hiring coming up in the next few years. Ask the guy sitting beside you next time; odds are they've already interviewed somewhere else. Stay or go; it's a decision that we all have to make. But make an honest assessment of what Firit will be and not banging the dillusional drum of snap up or pairty rates.
Current legacy A320 12 year rates are topping at nearly $400/hour while NK is $320 and F9 is $270. If you ever think that these two boat anchors of the industry when combined will have parity with any legacy, or even Southwest, then you really need to either step back and assess the industry or reach out to a mental health professional. Either carrier works for a lot of folks but if it doesn't then there is a lot of hiring coming up in the next few years. Ask the guy sitting beside you next time; odds are they've already interviewed somewhere else. Stay or go; it's a decision that we all have to make. But make an honest assessment of what Firit will be and not banging the dillusional drum of snap up or pairty rates.
#88
On Reserve
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Well that's interesting, I saw a commutable 4 day in open time at my base for days on end. I've been here a while and the day trips are working well with me and actually most guys I fly with like them unless they are commuting (which I understand). If I was a commuter I definitely would have left, but with having a family they are working great.
#89
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,841
Likes: 653
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Based on careful observation of how the DOJ review phase of that merger played out I believe the DOJ fully intended to tank the AS/HA merger, they just needed to go through some bureaucratic motions to make it look like a reasoned decision.
As part of that process they agreed to a specific timeline... both parties had some obligations but DOJ agreed to either oppose it after a 90 day or review or let it go. They fully intended to oppose.
Then there was this debate thing, and the election became ugly with the incumbents looking to lose over economic issues.
I think the administration told DOJ to not oppose, to avoid economy-unfriendly optics in the runup to the election. The passive aggressive manner in which they let the clock run out on the review period kind of supports that suspicion.
I don't know if DOJ would have succeeded in court, but I'm convinced they damn well intended to try, until they got waved off by the big guy.
As part of that process they agreed to a specific timeline... both parties had some obligations but DOJ agreed to either oppose it after a 90 day or review or let it go. They fully intended to oppose.
Then there was this debate thing, and the election became ugly with the incumbents looking to lose over economic issues.
I think the administration told DOJ to not oppose, to avoid economy-unfriendly optics in the runup to the election. The passive aggressive manner in which they let the clock run out on the review period kind of supports that suspicion.
I don't know if DOJ would have succeeded in court, but I'm convinced they damn well intended to try, until they got waved off by the big guy.
#90
Based on careful observation of how the DOJ review phase of that merger played out I believe the DOJ fully intended to tank the AS/HA merger, they just needed to go through some bureaucratic motions to make it look like a reasoned decision.
As part of that process they agreed to a specific timeline... both parties had some obligations but DOJ agreed to either oppose it after a 90 day or review or let it go. They fully intended to oppose.
Then there was this debate thing, and the election became ugly with the incumbents looking to lose over economic issues.
I think the administration told DOJ to not oppose, to avoid economy-unfriendly optics in the runup to the election. The passive aggressive manner in which they let the clock run out on the review period kind of supports that suspicion.
I don't know if DOJ would have succeeded in court, but I'm convinced they damn well intended to try, until they got waved off by the big guy.
As part of that process they agreed to a specific timeline... both parties had some obligations but DOJ agreed to either oppose it after a 90 day or review or let it go. They fully intended to oppose.
Then there was this debate thing, and the election became ugly with the incumbents looking to lose over economic issues.
I think the administration told DOJ to not oppose, to avoid economy-unfriendly optics in the runup to the election. The passive aggressive manner in which they let the clock run out on the review period kind of supports that suspicion.
I don't know if DOJ would have succeeded in court, but I'm convinced they damn well intended to try, until they got waved off by the big guy.


