![]() |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4030033)
I'd rather do that than rely on all of free garbage outlets with baked-in agendas. Also too lazy to jump through my digital arse every morning to access free article views.
Newsnation is OK as a wire service aggregator, but being free they do lean into some of the clickbait like UFO's and random missing persons. This morning is coed murders and Chandra Levy somehow linked to UFO's :rolleyes: Reuters is OK too, but they seem to have gone back and forth on subs requirements. The reporting that the WSJ does is probably the best of what has become a loathsome industry, and the distance between them and #2 is pretty substantial. They seem to do a much better than average job of keeping spin out of news they report. Sadly, that's where my go to source, the WaPo used to be, but that was like 30 years ago. I can't even read it now. The WSJ editorial page is really something else, though. Their hatred of labor blinds them sometimes to what is really going on, and you can tell they dance around biting the hand that feeds them. |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 4030049)
Well, it looks like most mainstream media agrees with the WSJ:
https://www.theguardian.com/business...er-failed-deal https://www.detroitnews.com/story/tr...e/89890590007/ https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/01/b...ting-down.html https://www.forbes.com/sites/suzanne...s-reports-say/ https://www.fox32chicago.com/news/sp...lines-shutdown https://www.independent.co.uk/us/mon...-b2969020.html https://www.reuters.com/business/spi...ts-2026-05-01/ https://www.barrons.com/articles/spi...ilout-d0a826e2 |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4030033)
I'd rather do that than rely on all of free garbage outlets with baked-in agendas. Also too lazy to jump through my digital arse every morning to access free article views.
Newsnation is OK as a wire service aggregator, but being free they do lean into some of the clickbait like UFO's and random missing persons. This morning is coed murders and Chandra Levy somehow linked to UFO's :rolleyes: Reuters is OK too, but they seem to have gone back and forth on subs requirements. |
Originally Posted by 9thAmendment
(Post 4030046)
If this was true the FAA would have pulled Spirit’s certificate already. Airlines aren’t allowed to slowly wind down at a future date for the obvious safety concerns involved in that. They just cease to exist all of the sudden.
|
Originally Posted by 9thAmendment
(Post 4030046)
If this was true the FAA would have pulled Spirit’s certificate already. Airlines aren’t allowed to slowly wind down at a future date for the obvious safety concerns involved in that. They just cease to exist all of the sudden.
My guess is this article was planted by a specific party in negotiations to apply pressure…again. We’ve seen that multiple times throughout this process. Even last week Spirit’s own attorney testified in court that Spirit would run out of cash by today if the government didn’t bail them out. Filler! |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4030004)
This is the WSJ, not www.aviationclickbaitblog.ru
They don't do sensationalism or clickbait, they use reliable sources, and they don't go off half-cocked. The subscription fee is $500/year and it's worth it. WSJ offers great 1 year deals. No where close to 500 backs a year. Yes it well worth having a subscription . |
Originally Posted by 69fastback
(Post 4030001)
seriously?
Filler |
Originally Posted by LTJ9
(Post 4030038)
Nah, spirit has been good to me for almost 15 years. Going to see it to the end.
I’ll figure out how to get home if it happens
Originally Posted by 9thAmendment
(Post 4030046)
If this was true the FAA would have pulled Spirit’s certificate already. Airlines aren’t allowed to slowly wind down at a future date for the obvious safety concerns involved in that. They just cease to exist all of the sudden.
My guess is this article was planted by a specific party in negotiations to apply pressure…again. We’ve seen that multiple times throughout this process. Even last week Spirit’s own attorney testified in court that Spirit would run out of cash by today if the government didn’t bail them out. |
Originally Posted by Zard
(Post 4030056)
If you have a .edu address, it’s five or six bucks a month.
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4030066)
That's worth exploring, but I don't currently have one.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:03 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands