SID clearances with no altitude instruction
07-06-2017 | 06:48 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
SID clearances with no altitude assignment
Hi,
Recently at a class B US airport departure clearances are being given with no altitude assignment at all. No "climb and maintain". No "climb via SID". No "top altitude". Just "cleared to XXX via XXXXX1 departure, departure freq 12X.XX, Squawk XXXX, expect runway XX". We are just expected to climb via SID without being told so.
Every other airport in the US I fly to still gives one of those altitude options, at least "climb via SID", even when assigned an RNAV SID.
ICAO standard is to include an altitude assignment of some kind in the departure clearance IIRC, but I haven't flown outside the US in some time, and it doesn't seem to be normal in the US. Have I missed something? Sadly my company doesn't really keep us up to date on all the latest ATC changes like most larger airlines do.
Thanks.
Recently at a class B US airport departure clearances are being given with no altitude assignment at all. No "climb and maintain". No "climb via SID". No "top altitude". Just "cleared to XXX via XXXXX1 departure, departure freq 12X.XX, Squawk XXXX, expect runway XX". We are just expected to climb via SID without being told so.
Every other airport in the US I fly to still gives one of those altitude options, at least "climb via SID", even when assigned an RNAV SID.
ICAO standard is to include an altitude assignment of some kind in the departure clearance IIRC, but I haven't flown outside the US in some time, and it doesn't seem to be normal in the US. Have I missed something? Sadly my company doesn't really keep us up to date on all the latest ATC changes like most larger airlines do.
Thanks.
Last edited by LoneStarM1A; 07-06-2017 at 07:15 AM.
07-06-2017 | 07:22 AM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
From: JAFO- First Observer
Did you query ATC on the initial altitude? What did they say? FAA JO 7110.65 contains the ATC clearance contents (policy, content and phraseology) for ATC personnel.
Each company (and/or union) normally has an ATC Rep. Have you contacted anyone? I would recommend filing an internal company safety report, ASAP if needed, and work it through the union. Also, your company could reach out to the POI, who would then coordinate with the Regional All Weather Ops/NextGen Branch Office (XXX-220) . The -220 folks have direct communication with ATC facilities within their Region of Responsibility. Hope this helps!
Each company (and/or union) normally has an ATC Rep. Have you contacted anyone? I would recommend filing an internal company safety report, ASAP if needed, and work it through the union. Also, your company could reach out to the POI, who would then coordinate with the Regional All Weather Ops/NextGen Branch Office (XXX-220) . The -220 folks have direct communication with ATC facilities within their Region of Responsibility. Hope this helps!
07-06-2017 | 07:25 AM
#3
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Did you query ATC on the initial altitude? What did they say? FAA JO 7110.65 contains the ATC clearance contents (policy, content and phraseology) for ATC personnel.
Each company (and/or union) normally has an ATC Rep. Have you contacted anyone? I would recommend filing an internal company safety report, ASAP if needed, and work it through the union. Also, your company could reach out to the POI, who would then coordinate with the Regional All Weather Ops/NextGen Branch Office (XXX-220) . The -220 folks have direct communication with ATC facilities within their Region of Responsibility. Hope this helps!
Each company (and/or union) normally has an ATC Rep. Have you contacted anyone? I would recommend filing an internal company safety report, ASAP if needed, and work it through the union. Also, your company could reach out to the POI, who would then coordinate with the Regional All Weather Ops/NextGen Branch Office (XXX-220) . The -220 folks have direct communication with ATC facilities within their Region of Responsibility. Hope this helps!
07-06-2017 | 07:34 AM
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,065
Likes: 40
From: 767 Captain
I didn't do an exhaustive search, but after sampling a few major airports I've operated out of recently, most US locations seem to publish an initial climb altitude on their SIDS. That's not good enough for you?
Guangzhou China and SEA don't, so they give you an initial climb altitude in your ATC clearance. Frankfurt, Paris, Ohare, EWR all publish altitudes on their SIDS. Absent anything else, I'd climb to the published altitude and expect higher with departure. I think you're making a problem where there isn't one.
Guangzhou China and SEA don't, so they give you an initial climb altitude in your ATC clearance. Frankfurt, Paris, Ohare, EWR all publish altitudes on their SIDS. Absent anything else, I'd climb to the published altitude and expect higher with departure. I think you're making a problem where there isn't one.
07-06-2017 | 10:23 AM
#5
New Hire
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
I didn't do an exhaustive search, but after sampling a few major airports I've operated out of recently, most US locations seem to publish an initial climb altitude on their SIDS. That's not good enough for you?
Guangzhou China and SEA don't, so they give you an initial climb altitude in your ATC clearance. Frankfurt, Paris, Ohare, EWR all publish altitudes on their SIDS. Absent anything else, I'd climb to the published altitude and expect higher with departure. I think you're making a problem where there isn't one.
Guangzhou China and SEA don't, so they give you an initial climb altitude in your ATC clearance. Frankfurt, Paris, Ohare, EWR all publish altitudes on their SIDS. Absent anything else, I'd climb to the published altitude and expect higher with departure. I think you're making a problem where there isn't one.
07-06-2017 | 04:36 PM
#6
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Ok, fair enough, but they've issued clearances to include "climb via SID" for years and when one day they all of a sudden start omitting it (no revision to the SID chart), it makes one wonder if they've missed something important that could alter what they should be doing operationally. If the consensus is that it's nothing to be concerned about, I'll carry on.
07-06-2017 | 09:13 PM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,215
Likes: 0
From: Capt
I was just overseas, I think ICN. ATC said climb 310. I thought, no way that is the initial altitude. We called back, asking for the initial altitude. They said "climb via the SID to 6000." There was NO Top Altitude on this SID. I'm glad we asked for clarification.
07-06-2017 | 09:54 PM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,170
Likes: 97
From: Volleyball Player
The first time they did it, my F/O asked them something to the effect of "should we climb via SID?" to which the controller responded "We're not supposed to say that anymore". I haven't asked again lately but have been checking on with departure saying "leaving XXXX climbing XXXX" instead of the usual "climbing via XXXX1 departure", since there are no published crossing restrictions on these departures anyway, just a top altitude. Thanks for the suggestions on getting an answer.
07-07-2017 | 07:12 AM
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
You should get a clearance in Russia like, "cleared to destination, squawk 1234." Nothing more! Why? Well, in the old days, the navigator went to ops the day before or earlier, filed the route and it was approved by ATC and the political officer--done. Since the filing contained everything needed except the squawk, which was probably a secret until immediately before departure, no need for any route or altitude.
GF
GF
10-06-2017 | 12:02 AM
#10
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
This is CVG if anyone cares. They're still not issuing any sort of altitude, at least in their verbal clearances. I would be interested to know if they're including something in their ACARS PDC's, but I am not typically in an aircraft so equipped.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
