Assymetrical Thrust proper tech in x-wind?
#42
Never Have...Never Will
On landing....NEVER !!
Directional control in a turbo-jet aircraft is maintaine with ailerons, rudder or a combination thereof.
Just my two cents Mates....G'Day
#44
Rtfq
In a propeller driven aircraft, perhaps, depending on the type aircraft and airport/runway conditions. That technique was used in a large tail dragger, such as the DC-3.
Hmmmmm
G'Day Mates
#45
If you aren't using the rudder, you are either increasing your yaw to the runway and/or not killing your drift ... depending on which engine (upwind or downwind) you pull.
See my previous threads if you need more explaination.
#46
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Window Seat
Posts: 1,430
I've flown the 1900 ... still don't know why you guys are suggesting this is a safe technique.
If you aren't using the rudder, you are either increasing your yaw to the runway and/or not killing your drift ... depending on which engine (upwind or downwind) you pull.
See my previous threads if you need more explaination.
If you aren't using the rudder, you are either increasing your yaw to the runway and/or not killing your drift ... depending on which engine (upwind or downwind) you pull.
See my previous threads if you need more explaination.
Also, regarding the 1900 not being a jet, my apologies, didn't notice the question was specifically asking for jets, just saw a lot of bickering back and forth with one side talking about how it works in practice and the other side saying how it doesn't work on paper.
Ever landed on a contaminated paved or gravel runway with crosswind components exceeding 40 knots?
The reason the technique is used is because it works, it's worked for decades and it will continue to work, day in and day out up here, we make due with the conditions and equipment we have.
#47
Rubber dogsh#t out of HKG
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Senior Seat Cushion Tester Extraordinaire
Posts: 620
I had to do a few landings in the DC-3 in which asymmetrical thrust was required to maintain directional control....especially when loaded towards the aft CG limits and especially during the landing roll-out with the tailwheel on the ground.
There is nothing improper about using asymmetrical thrust for xwind landings, piston or jet.
There is nothing improper about using asymmetrical thrust for xwind landings, piston or jet.
#48
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Window Seat
Posts: 1,430
I had to do a few landings in the DC-3 in which asymmetrical thrust was required to maintain directional control....especially when loaded towards the aft CG limits and especially during the landing roll-out with the tailwheel on the ground.
There is nothing improper about using asymmetrical thrust for xwind landings, piston or jet.
There is nothing improper about using asymmetrical thrust for xwind landings, piston or jet.
#50
Asymmetric thrust is most commonly used in fairly lightly wingloaded aircraft as a technique to get a little more crosswind capability from an aircraft that has run out of rudder and can't land in a crab. It just adds a little directional control when there isn't enough rudder.
Some heavy jets can land in a crabbed or partially crabbed condition and this may even be preferable in a low friction situation. It also serves to increase the crosswind capability.
I have never seen a jet flight manual recommend asymetric thrust as a landing practice, or a takeoff practice. Would it work? Sure, but they don't want you doing it. Just like they don't want you exceeding crosswind limits or landing on an icy runway with no effective braking. Most of us don't want that recorded on the data recorder or having to explain why we were experimenting with an unauthorized method.
Most anyone can touchdown in any crosswind within reason, the tough part is what happens after touchdown, keeping control of direction after touchdown in a jet is a little different than a light twin and there is less margin in runway width, reverse and braking requirements.
Some heavy jets can land in a crabbed or partially crabbed condition and this may even be preferable in a low friction situation. It also serves to increase the crosswind capability.
I have never seen a jet flight manual recommend asymetric thrust as a landing practice, or a takeoff practice. Would it work? Sure, but they don't want you doing it. Just like they don't want you exceeding crosswind limits or landing on an icy runway with no effective braking. Most of us don't want that recorded on the data recorder or having to explain why we were experimenting with an unauthorized method.
Most anyone can touchdown in any crosswind within reason, the tough part is what happens after touchdown, keeping control of direction after touchdown in a jet is a little different than a light twin and there is less margin in runway width, reverse and braking requirements.
Last edited by jungle; 08-14-2009 at 11:37 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post