Search
Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Boeing vs. Airbus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-26-2011, 06:43 PM
  #11  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by freightguy View Post
The Airbus is certainly more comfortable and spacious. The tray table is worth it's weight in Gold. You don't have to look side-ways at your approach plate or clip your approach plate on the yoke. Inflight meals are easier to eat on an Airbus. The joystick is fun to fly as well... but you do lose a bit of feedback.

Boeings are a little more cramped due to the big-a$$ control wheel. However, you do have more feedback on the control wheel. I think Boeings are a bit more fun to land.

Airbus is more automated. It has bank, pitch, stall limits you cannot exceed under normal flight. However, usually a pilot never even gets close to those limits during routine flights. So you really don't feel the difference unless you're looking for the flight envelopes.

Airbus attempted to protect against some pilot errors by adding increasing automations and limitations. However at the end of the day the accident rates are same on both the fleets. In an Airbus, the computer will kill you. In a Boeing, the pilot will kill you
The tray table is worth it's weight in gold? I heard it can only handle 120 lbs for a reason. Right?
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 07-26-2011, 06:44 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: A320 captain
Posts: 209
Default

What, there's no computers in a 737?
Computers wherever they are tend to do what they're told to do.
TTOCSMCC is offline  
Old 07-26-2011, 06:53 PM
  #13  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Ya'll say what you want, but at Delta the proof is in the pudding that there is only 1 model in the fleet that we're still willing to fly 35 years after it was made!





And that's not even including the -30s that go back to 69!

Let's celebrate:

forgot to bid is offline  
Old 07-26-2011, 06:56 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 581
Default

I've flown both and don't think it's fair to generalize by manufacturer. Rather a better comparison is between competing products...

That said, I prefer the A-320 hands-down over the so-called "Next generation" 737 series. IMHO that aircraft (737NG) is the definition of mediocrity. That opinion seems to be validated by the relative sales performance of the two types at the 2011 Paris Air Show.
Wasatch Phantom is offline  
Old 07-26-2011, 07:04 PM
  #15  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Yes. Here is an example of its bank angle limiter. Boeing refers to it as the #4 engine.





Carl
ROTFLMAO

But, a point of order: Boeing may have refered to it as the #4 engine, but airbus refered to it as a small tube protruding from the engine.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 07-26-2011, 07:06 PM
  #16  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Yes. Here is an example of its bank angle limiter. Boeing refers to it as the #4 engine.





Carl
Originally Posted by scambo1 View Post
ROTFLMAO

But, a point of order: Boeing may have refered to it as the #4 engine, but airbus refered to it as a small tube protruding from the engine.
There really should be a post hall of fame around here.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 07-26-2011, 07:09 PM
  #17  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Yes. Here is an example of its bank angle limiter. Boeing refers to it as the #4 engine.





Carl
haha!!!! You da man, Carl.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 07-26-2011, 07:29 PM
  #18  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
There really should be a post hall of fame around here.
I'll be here all week!

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 07-26-2011, 07:49 PM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 60
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Yes. Here is an example of its bank angle limiter. Boeing refers to it as the #4 engine.





Carl
I have to imagine it would be hard to buy a ticket on a carrier like this, knowing that two little guys who can barely drive a car correctly, but are treated like gods by their crew are at the helm.
crazy pills is offline  
Old 07-26-2011, 07:49 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,511
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Yes. Here is an example of its bank angle limiter. Boeing refers to it as the #4 engine.

Carl
LOL

That is actually wicked funny. Like Bill Murray funny. Awesome, Carl!
Boomer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Technical
3
09-06-2007 02:51 PM
fireman0174
Major
16
04-18-2007 09:33 AM
fireman0174
Major
4
05-24-2006 08:44 AM
captain_drew
Hangar Talk
0
12-30-2005 07:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices