Search

Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Inbound Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-2011 | 08:06 AM
  #11  
galaxy flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Default

Is it a TERPS or PANS-OPS procedure? It would make a difference if coming from the south.

GF
Reply
Old 08-01-2011 | 09:08 AM
  #12  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by wizepilot
That 1400' is only good if you are ON the radial or loc inbound within 10nm of TAM. Look at the MSA. If they told you to maintain 3,000, cleared for the approach, then stay there until at least you complete the procedure turn, the loc comes alive and you are within 10nm of TAM. Then you can descend to 1400. I know it's a short distance. If you go down to 1400 on your way out, then turn off the course to do the procedure turn, you may not know what you might run into.
Originally Posted by wizepilot
Let me requalify my previous post. If you are within 15DME or 10DME TAM (same thing) then you can go down to 1400. Once the loc comes alive, and you are within the proper distance, you are terrain protected. I had to look at that plate again! Carry on.
I think you were correcting yourself, but just to clarify you can descend to 1400ft if you are established on the TAM 317 radial. Look at the profile. It shows a descent line to 1400ft with a 317 above the line. It also says 10NM of D5.0 TAM or D4.2 ITAM. Just stay with in 15 miles of the TAM VOR, as the 10 mi protection ring is centered around the TAM 5 DME point.

Last edited by johnso29; 08-01-2011 at 10:45 AM.
Reply
Old 08-01-2011 | 02:02 PM
  #13  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: 75/76 FO
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I think you were correcting yourself, but just to clarify you can descend to 1400ft if you are established on the TAM 317 radial. Look at the profile. It shows a descent line to 1400ft with a 317 above the line. It also says 10NM of D5.0 TAM or D4.2 ITAM. Just stay with in 15 miles of the TAM VOR, as the 10 mi protection ring is centered around the TAM 5 DME point.
Yep, makes sense... 1,400' after TAM and "established" on the 317 radial.

Now my other question refers to "established." We have been training within 1 dot is established but I cannot find where this came from.
Reply
Old 08-01-2011 | 02:36 PM
  #14  
galaxy flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Default

Within "1 Dot" comes from ICAO's definition of "on course"; or +\- 5 degrees for NDB. Check PANS-OPS Doc 8168, Vol 1. Technically, the FAA's position is that "on course" is needle centered, 1 dot off course and intercepting is technique to lead the intercept of the course, not "on course".

GF
Reply
Old 08-01-2011 | 03:02 PM
  #15  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
Within "1 Dot" comes from ICAO's definition of "on course"; or +\- 5 degrees for NDB. Check PANS-OPS Doc 8168, Vol 1. Technically, the FAA's position is that "on course" is needle centered, 1 dot off course and intercepting is technique to lead the intercept of the course, not "on course".

GF
GF -

While looking up some of the things discussed today with a fellow worker he pointed out to me the passage in the 'Instrument Procedures Handbook' which defined 'on course' as [1 dot]. I wrote down the reference manual and page number but don't have it with me now. That same paragraph also mentions the +/- 5 deg of oncourse bearing for the NDB as you mention above. Maybe this is another area where the FAA has adopted ICAO standards of recent?

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 08-02-2011 | 11:08 AM
  #16  
fatmike69's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: EMB120 CA
Default

Never flown into Mexico, but why is there no IAF labeled? In the U.S., could you even legally begin this approach without radar vectors?
Reply
Old 08-02-2011 | 08:09 PM
  #17  
galaxy flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Default

The more recent version of the chart has a multitude of IAFs.

GF
Reply
Old 08-02-2011 | 08:42 PM
  #18  
TheFly's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,300
Likes: 0
From: Seat 0B
Default

I read in the Jeppesen instrument procedures guide that half-scale or less is established.
Reply
Old 08-04-2011 | 02:59 PM
  #19  
galaxy flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Default

Thefly

Right out of ICAO Doc 8168, that is

GF
Reply
Old 08-05-2011 | 01:41 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: L Side
Default

To the OP,

I think galaxy flyer's answers are best (though I haven't been based in the US in a few years.)

On another note, funny how some other posters were ridiculing you and it turns out that theirs were not the best answers. You'll find this a common theme throughout your career. Just keep asking questions and reading on your own to gain knowledge despite the detractors.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Horizon513
Hangar Talk
5
08-08-2010 10:27 AM
RVSM Certified
Flight Schools and Training
22
02-27-2009 12:04 PM
USMCFLYR
Military
16
08-28-2008 09:15 PM
USMCFLYR
Hangar Talk
3
08-23-2008 08:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices