Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
Why does the Airbus STOP on the runway? >

Why does the Airbus STOP on the runway?

Search
Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Why does the Airbus STOP on the runway?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2006, 01:35 PM
  #101  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 767
Posts: 18
Default

Originally Posted by MEM_ATC View Post
I've noticed a number of Airbus (cargo and passenger) that will literally come to a complete stop on the runway after landing.

During busy pushes, this can really lead to some excitement in the Tower. The Local and Ground Controllers are often coordinating with each other to have a landing aircraft follow a taxiing aircraft at a specific intersection; there might be another landing aircraft on short final or the Tower Controller might have an aircraft slotted for immediate takeoff.

When an aircraft comes to a complete stop on the runway, we are wonding what is happening out there. The aircraft then comes up on the power and slowly inches off the runway -- while the Local Controller sits poised with his thumb on the mike button waiting for the "GO AROUND!" or "CLEARED FOR IMMEDIATE TAKEOFF!" command to be transmitted.

Can someone shed some light on the subject? It's always an Airbus.

MEM_ATC

NOTE: Crossposted to "Majors" forum.
If it's a Brown Tail A300, at one specific airport, it's one captain that is inducing problems into that aircraft that maintenence will be dealing with for years to come. Hope the poor guy that needs those rev's on the next leg doesn't have to pay for this guy's FUN...
757mech is offline  
Old 12-14-2006, 02:49 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by dudewannabe View Post
wow, that's mature. are you REALLY a FedEx pilot?

kinda disappointed.

Don't worry about it. I've already beat the dead horse of what an arrogant SOB he is.

Somebody told me once that he is the AP forums equivilant of FI's SWAFO who works for SW.

I believe it.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 12-14-2006, 06:32 PM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptainMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FDX A300 CPT
Posts: 967
Default

i won't waste my time..good luck with that career of yours...
CaptainMark is offline  
Old 12-15-2006, 07:29 AM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 1559
Posts: 1,533
Default

I was logged in. Not sure why they didn't come up, but they do now. Thanks Tony. I learned something. Pretty cool looking.

Haven't been riding much lately. Need to though. Let me check my sched.
MX727 is offline  
Old 12-15-2006, 07:38 AM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 349
Default

Hello everybody,
does the outer tire of the nose-gear only come of the earth in tight turns on the MD-11? Or does that happen on all aircraft. It seems logic. But if it is only on the MD-11 (DC-10?) what is the reason for this? And does this not put alot of stress on the nose-gear?
Thanks in advance

regards
Jakob
Jakob is offline  
Old 12-23-2006, 12:35 PM
  #106  
No one's home
 
III Corps's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,091
Default

Originally Posted by Jakob View Post
Hello everybody,
does the outer tire of the nose-gear only come of the earth in tight turns on the MD-11? Or does that happen on all aircraft. It seems logic. But if it is only on the MD-11 (DC-10?) what is the reason for this? And does this not put alot of stress on the nose-gear?
Thanks in advance

regards
Jakob
Few current aircraft seem to do it.. first one I saw doing it was the Constellations Eastern flew out of ATL. And that was a LONG time ago...
III Corps is offline  
Old 12-23-2006, 05:59 PM
  #107  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by Jakob View Post

does the outer tire of the nose-gear only come of the earth in tight turns on the MD-11? Or does that happen on all aircraft. It seems logic. But if it is only on the MD-11 (DC-10?) what is the reason for this? And does this not put alot of stress on the nose-gear?


The nose landing gear on the DC-10/MD-11/MD-10 does not project straight down from the fuselage, but rather angles forward. Consequently, when the nosegear turns away from dead center in either direction, weight is transferred progressively to the "inside" tire, to the point where the outside tire will actually lift off the ground at light weights (or at aft CGs).

Reason? I dunno. I didn't design it, I just fly it.


However, I feel pretty certain the engineers designed the nosegear to survive the failure of a single nosegear tire during a takeoff or landing, so I would assume 1 tire can bear the entire load. Furthermore, limiting speeds for turns while taxiing must prevent excessive side loads on the gear and the tires. I'm guessing they figured all that stuff out before they even started building the airplanes, and the fact they carried the design forward to the MD-11 from its predecessor leads me to believe it worked out OK.


It's the main landing gear that I'm not so sure about.





.
TonyC is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AUS_ATC
Cargo
106
12-23-2006 05:59 PM
AUS_ATC
Major
24
12-18-2006 07:56 AM
miker1369
Major
4
11-24-2006 12:55 AM
JustAMushroom
Regional
31
10-10-2006 07:20 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices