Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
Max Demonstrated X-wind Componet >

Max Demonstrated X-wind Componet

Search
Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Max Demonstrated X-wind Componet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-2007, 09:56 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Citation Captain
Posts: 121
Default

Time to dust off Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators...... I thought I was done with that book!
172capt is offline  
Old 02-28-2007, 12:26 PM
  #12  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

A theoretical value for max crosswind obtained by a computer code with all the coefficients and assumed steady winds would be limited by pilot technique, and as such represents an optimized flight condition. Most crosswind landings are finished in a sideslip following a crab, and the transition takes some skill which varies with the pilot. You also would want a fudge factor in case of gust so you don't scrape a wing. In the end, the calculation would be a ballpark sort of thing at best. This is why test pilots are the best source of performance data.
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 03-04-2007, 12:19 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryane946's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: FO, looking left
Posts: 1,057
Default

Just don't do this.

P.S. Does anyone know if this picture is real?? I saw it on an april fools joke website. So I am not sure if they were making fun on the picture, or if they just photoshopped it. Thanks
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
xwindjet.JPG.jpg (50.1 KB, 136 views)
ryane946 is offline  
Old 03-04-2007, 12:57 PM
  #14  
APC co-founder
 
HSLD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: B777
Posts: 5,853
Default

My money is on Photoshop, look at the flat spot on the left main tire and blur in the grass on the in the infield from. There are some other clues, but over all it's a pretty good job.

Fake or not, it does serve as a graphic example of why there a crosswind limitations for landing
HSLD is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 08:39 AM
  #15  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Default

Photoshop. Wings are extremely strong...the force required to do that kind of damage would have cart-wheeled the airplane.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 09:12 PM
  #16  
Flying Farmer
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Posts: 3,160
Default

**Pic is photoshopped definately**

On Topic:
I think everyone's got great opinions, and I agree. It's a guideline, but as stated above, 38kts for the 777, that's pretty much a max anyways. My take on components above demonstrated are that you if you aren't proficient, 50% MDXW is your max. Avg pilot can probably take MDXW, and a proficient pilot in most cases can take 150% MDXW with a fight.

It's when you get 100%+ you need to take precautions in aircraft configurations and alternative airports as a better option. Personally, I just keep the flaps up and use differential thrust in my twins, and I've taken 200%. If I was in a single engine plane, high-wing I'd take maybe 125% max, low-wing 150%. Just based on it's weight vs speed @ landing etc...
Ewfflyer is offline  
Old 06-03-2007, 06:35 PM
  #17  
On Reserve
 
barrydb's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 17
Default

Flying in oklahoma, you find out rather quickly that it is not a limitation. Especially when an airforce T1 overruns the active runway and the hot brakes start a grass fire and you have to land with a 28 knot x-wind component in a 152 or divert to another airport. (I recommend the diversion!)
barrydb is offline  
Old 06-03-2007, 06:59 PM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
jetcaptain's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 64
Default

Full power and Full rudder! Works every time.
jetcaptain is offline  
Old 06-03-2007, 09:30 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bri85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 606
Default

these are pretty good examples

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VoYVOJLkTw0
Bri85 is offline  
Old 06-06-2007, 09:27 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bla bla bla's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: rj 700/900
Posts: 506
Default

Max xwind is more for legality reasons. I think the 172 is 15 knots, I know some to land them in {edit} knots and do just fine, you just have to keep your forward speed for effective airflow over your control surfaces. The stronger the xwind the less flaps you should use to keep your airspeed up (assuming you have appropriate field length). When you slow you are at the winds mercy, ie. full rudder deflection, and max aileron use and you still drift, or slide on the runway. When lift dies, you need now to be concerned with gusts fliping the plane. Be carefull. Best to just do touch and go's if you’re exceeding your demonstrated xwind component. Although your flight school probably have their own limitations that you should comply with.

Last edited by bla bla bla; 06-06-2007 at 09:33 AM.
bla bla bla is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices